Skip to main content
Log in

Die Bedeutung der Arbeiten Albrecht von Graefes für die Gesichtsfeldprüfung

The importance of Albrecht von Graefe's work on the examination of the visual field

  • Published:
Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

von Graefe's paper „Über die Untersuchung des Gesichtsfeldes bei amblyopischen Affektionen“ initiated the systematic examination of the visual field in ophthalmology. He insisted that the objective changes recorded by the ophthalmoscope should be related to the resulting functional disturbances. His treatise is of fundamental importance with its wealth of keen observations and new methods. Von Graefe made a distinction between absolute and relative loss of vision within field defects and demonstrated the significance of fixation in perimetry. He described the characteristic lesions of choroiditis, detachment of the retina and the various forms of hemianopia. Cataract and opacities of the vitreous cause only relative interference with the visual field. Visual defects are highly significant in glaucoma, although von Graefe failed to recognize the characteristic development of these lesions. Perimetry was for him indispensable in examining the individual patient: he liked to demonstrate it on his patients in order to bring home to his students how important it is in diagnosis and prognosis, thus establishing perimetry as a clinical examination procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harms, H. Die Bedeutung der Arbeiten Albrecht von Graefes für die Gesichtsfeldprüfung. Albrecht von Graefes Arch. Klin. Ophthalmol. 181, 120–129 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414752

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414752

Navigation