Skip to main content
Log in

Pipe flow of suspensions

  • Published:
Applied Scientific Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study shows that fully developed pipe flow of a particulate suspension is defined by four dimensionless parameters of particle-fluid interactions in addition to the Reynolds number. Effects accounted for include the Magnus effect due to fluid shear, electrostatic repulsion due to electric charges on the particles, and Brownian or turbulent diffusion. In the case of a laminar liquid-solid suspension, electrostatic effect is negligible but shear effect is prominent. Solution of the basic equations gives the density distribution of particles with a peak at the center (Einstein, Jeffery) or at other radii between the center and the pipe wall (Segré et al) depending on the magnitudes of the various flow parameters. In the case of a turbulent gas-solid suspension, the Magnus effect is significant only within the thickness of the laminar sublayer. However, charges induced on the particles by the impact of particles at the wall produce a higher density at the wall than at the center of the pipe. The velocity distribution of particles is characterized by a slip velocity at the wall and a lag in velocity in the core from the fluid phase. These results are verified by earlier measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Einstein, A., Ann. Physik (Leipzig) 19 (1906) 289.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jeffery, G. B., Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A 102 (1922) 161.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Segré, G. and A. Silberberg, Nature 189 (1961) 209; J. Fluid Mech. 14 (1962) 115, 136.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Soo, S. L., G. J. Trezek, R. C. Dimick, and G. F. Hohnstreiter, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 3 (1964) 98.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Soo, S. L. and G. J. Trezek, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 5 (1966) 388.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schlichting, H., Boundary Layer Theory, pp. 11, 464, 504, 506, McGraw-Hill, New York 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hinze, J. O., Turbulence, p. 24, McGraw-Hill, New York 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Soo, S. L., Chem. Eng. Sci. 5 (1956) 57.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Soo, S. L., Fluid Dynamics of Multiphase Systems, pp. 16, 33, 46, 76, 176, 200, 256, 262, 263, Blaisdell, Publ. Co. Waltham (Mass.) 1967.

  10. Soo, S. L., Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 3 (1964) 75.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hinze, J. O., Appl. Sci. Res. A 11 (1962) 33.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Soo, S. L., Non-Equilibrium Fluid Dynamics-Flow over a Flat Plate, ZAMP, in press, 1968.

  13. Soo, S. L., Proc. Symp. on Interactions between Fluids and Particles, p. 50, Inst. Chem. Engrs., London 1962; Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 4 (1965) 426.

  14. Saffmann, P. G., J. Fluid Mech. 22 (1965) 385.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Daily, J. W. and G. Bugliarello, Ind. Eng. Chem. 51 (1959) 887.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pfeffer, R., S. Rossetti, and S. Lieblein, NASA TN D-3603, NASA, Washington (D.C.) 1966.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soo, S.L. Pipe flow of suspensions. Appl. sci. Res. 21, 68–84 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411597

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411597

Keywords

Navigation