Summary
The startle response in rats to a sudden sound was increased when the startle was elicited in the presence of a flashing light (CS) which had previously been paired with electric shock. The magnitude of this potentiated startle was used as a measure of the conditioned fear elicited by the CS.
The effects of different doses of amobarbital sodium on the potentiated startle, the startle in the presence of a flashing light which had not been paired with shock, and the startle to electric shock were tested. It was found that the drug reduced the magnitude of the potentiated startle response and reduced even more the startle to electric shock, but apparently had little, if any, effect on the startle to loud sound in the presence of a neutral CS. The effects lasted for at least 90 min after i.p. injections of the drug.
The action of amobarbital was interpreted in terms of a selective reduction in the strength of the fear drive, but other interpretations were not ruled out.
The fact that this drug produced differential effects on startle responses elicited in different ways, suggests that such responses may be useful measures of differential psychopharmacological effects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, C. J., and N. E. Miller: The effect of sodium amytal on an approach-avoidance conflict in cats. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 45, 205–208 (1952).
Brown, J. S., H. I. Kalish, and I. E. Farber: Conditioned fear as revealed by magnitude of startle response to an auditory stimulus. J. exp. Psychol. 41, 317–328 (1951).
Davis, J. D., and N. E. Miller: Fear and pain: their effect on self-injection of amobarbital sodium by rats. Science 141, 1286–1287 (1963).
Lindquist, E. F.: Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1953.
Miller, N. E.: Learnable drives and rewards. In: S. S. Stevens (Ed.): Handbook of experimental psychology, p. 435–472. New York: Wiley 1951.
—: Some recent studies of conflict behavior and drugs. Amer. Psychologist 16, 12–24 (1961).
—: The analysis of motivational effects illustrated by experiments on amylobarbitone sodium. In: Steinberg, H., A. V. S. de Reuck, and J. Knight (Editors): Animal behavior and drug action, p. 1–18. London: Churchill 1964.
—, and H. Barry III: Motivational effects of drugs: methods which illustrate some general problems in psychopharmacology. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 1, 169–199 (1960).
Trotter, John: Personal communication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Work on this study was supported by Grant MY 2949 from the National Institute of Mental Health, United States Public Health Service.
The author wishes to thank Dr. N. E. Miller who was consulted on every phase of the research and Dr. J. D. Davis who designed the transducer and suggested the system for recording startle responses.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chi, C.C. The effect of amobarbital sodium on conditioned fear as measured by the potentiated startle response in rats. Psychopharmacologia 7, 115–122 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00403634
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00403634