Skip to main content
Log in

The role of functional assessment in evaluating urinary incontinence

  • Special Contribution
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Particularly for older people, ability to function can play an important role in generating and maintaining continence. Assessment of function is essential to proper clinical evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence. Physical, mental, environmental, and social factors should be evaluated, including mobility, balance, musculoskeletal strength and flexibility, fine motor coordination, vision, body awareness, ability to understand and follow simple instructions, motivation, access to toilet, adequacy of physical supports, availability of a caregiver, caregiver-patient dynamics, and the effect of incontinence on social interactions. Assessment strategies should involve careful first-hand observations, use of clinically appropriate assessment instruments, and, where indicated, use of a geriatric assessment team. A functional profile is useful in tailoring treatment strategies to the needs and strengths of individual patients, as well as in monitoring progress. The development of treatment plans is often best carried out in the setting of a health-care team conference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ory MG, Wyman JF, Yu L. Psychosocial factors in urinary incontinence. Clin Geriatr Med 1986; 2:657–671

    Google Scholar 

  2. Resnick NM, Yalla SV, Laurino E. The pathophysiology of urinary incontinence among institutionalized elderly persons. N Engl J Med 1989; 320:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brocklehurst JC, Andrews K, Richards B, Laycock PJ. Incidence and correlates of incontinence in stroke patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985; 33:540–542

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rubenstein LZ. Geriatric assessment: an overview of its impacts. Clin Geriatr Med 1987; 3(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  5. Williams, ME. Outpatient geriatric evaluation. Clin Geriatr Med 1987; 3(1):175–184

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ouslander JG, Morishita L, Blaustein J, Orzeck S, Dunn S, Sayre, J. Clinical, functional, and psychosocial characteristics of an incontinent nursing home population. J Gerontol 1987; 42:631–637

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ouslander JG, Uman GC, Urman WN, Rubenstein LZ. Incontinence among nursing home patients: clinical and functional correlates. J Am Geriatr Soc 1987; 35:324–330

    Google Scholar 

  8. Katz S, Akpom A. A measure of primary socibiological functions. Int J Health Serv 1976; 6:493–507

    Google Scholar 

  9. Williams ME, Hadler NM, Earp JA. Manual ability as a marker of dependency in geriatric women. J Chronic Dis 1982; 35:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  10. Williams, ME. Identifying the older person likely to require long-term care services. J Am Geriatr Soc 1987; 35:761–766

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scholer SG, Potter JF, Burke WJ. Does the Williams Manual Test predict service use among subjects undergoing geriatric assessment? J Am Geriatr Soc 1990; 38:767–772

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jones TV, Williams ME. Rethinking the approach to evaluating mental functioning of older persons: the value of careful observations. J Am Geriatr Soc 1988; 36:1128–1134

    Google Scholar 

  13. Folstein MF, Folstein SE. Mini-Mental State — a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12:189–198

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1975; 23:433–441

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morris JC, Heyman A, Mohs RC, et al. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's disease. Part I. Clinical and neurological assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1989; 39:1159–1165

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gaylord S, Zung W. Affective disorders and aging. In: Carstensen L, Edelstein B, eds. Handbook of clinical gerontology. Pergamon Press: New York, 1987:76–95

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 1982; 17:37–49

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koenig, HG, Meador KG, Cohen HJ, Blazer DB. Self-rated depression scales and screening for major depression in the older hospitalized patient with medical illness. J Am Geriatr Soc 1988; 36:699–706

    Google Scholar 

  19. Burgio KL, Whitehead WE, Engel, BT. Urinary incontinence in the elderly. Bladder-sphincter biofeedback and toileting skills training. Ann Intern Med 1985; 104:507–515

    Google Scholar 

  20. Castleden CM, Duffin HM, Asher MJ, Yeomanson CW. Factors influencing outcome in elderly patients with urinary incontinence and detrusor instability. Age Ageing 1985; 14:303–307

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaylord, S.A., Williams, M.E. The role of functional assessment in evaluating urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2, 50–54 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00400047

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00400047

Keywords

Navigation