Skip to main content
Log in

Competitive reversals and environment-dependent resource partitioning in Erodium

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Effects of drought and varying plant density on the competitive coexistence of two winter annual Erodium species were studied using multiple regression analysis. Significant indications of resource partitioning were detected for interspecific mixtures under spring drought. Competitive superiority also was environment-dependent with E. botrys dominating with drought in autumn, while E. brachycarpum dominated with drought in spring. The results suggest that competitive coexistence in Erodium is promoted by processes both equilibrial (e.g., resource partitioning) and nonequilibrial (e.g. competitive reversals).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker HG, Stebbins GL (1965) The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolome JW (1976) Early rains alter range forage. Cal Agric 30:14–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolome JW (1979) Germination and seedling establishment in California annual grassland. J Ecol 67:273–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Black JN, Wilkinson GN (1963) The role of time of emergence in determining the growth of individual plants in swards of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Aust J Agric Res 14:628–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Braakhekke WG (1980) On coexistence: a causal approach to diversity and stability of grassland vegetation. Agric Res Rep (Versl Landbouwk Onderz) 902:1–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredense F (1983) Interspecific competition and niche differentiation between Plantago lanceolata and Anthoxanthumn odoratum in a natural hayfield. J Ecol 71:379–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H (1978) Predator-mediated coexistence: a nonequilibrium model. Amer Natur 112:127–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson PL (1983) Coexistence of competitors in a stochastic environment: the storage effect. Proc Int Conf Pop Biol, Edmonton, Alberta, 1982

  • de Wit CT, Tow GP, Ennik GC (1966) Competition between legumes and grasses. Agric Res Rep (Versl Landbouwk Onderz) 687:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing AL, Menke JW (1983) Reproductive potential of Bromus mollis and Avena barbata under drought conditions. Madrono 30:159–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenner M (1978) A comparison of the abilities of colonizers and closed-turf species to establish from seed in artificial swards. J Ecol 66:953–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Werner PA (1983) Equivalence of competitors in plant communities: a null hypothesis and a field experimental approach. Amer J Bot 70:1098–1104

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross KL, Werner PA (1982) Colonizing abilities of “biennial” plant species in relation to ground cover: implications for their distributions in successional fields. Ecology 63:921–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb PJ (1977) The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev 52:107–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guittonneau G-G (1972) Contribution al'etude biosytematique du genre Erodium L'Her dans le bassin mediterraneen occidental. Bioissiera 20:1–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1969) The role of predation in vegetational diversity. Brookhaven Symp Biol 22:48–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL, Clatworthy JN, McNaughton IH, Sagar GR (1961) The evolution and ecology of closely related species living in the same area. Evolution 15:209–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady HF (1958) Vegetational changes in the California annual type. Ecology 39:402–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston M (1979) A general hyothesis of species diversity. Amer Natur 113:81–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1948) Circular causal systems in ecology. Ann N Y Acad Sci 50:221–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Amer Natur 95:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall DR, Jain SK (1969) Interference in pure and mixed stands of Avena fatua and A. barbata. J Ecol 57:251–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin MM, Harding J (1981) Evidence for the evolution of competition between two species of annual plants. Evolution 35:975–987

    Google Scholar 

  • Munz PA (1968) A California flora and supplement. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA (1980) Non-equilibrium coexistence of plants. Bull Torrey Bot Club 107:238–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt MD, Heady HF (1978) Responses of annual vegetation to temperature and rainfall patterns in northern California. Ecology 59:336–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice KJ (1984) Plant life history variation and colonization dynamics in a variable environment: the population biology of two sympatric winter annuals, Erodium botrys (Cav.) Bertol. and E. brachycarpum (Godr.) Thell. (Geraniaceae). PhD Thesis, University of California, Davis, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ GR (1982) Overgrowth in a marine epifaunal community: competitive hierarchies and competitive networks. Oecologia (Berl) 53:12–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury EJ (1942) The reproductive capacity of plants. Bell and Sons, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt KP, Lawlor LR (1983) Growth rate projection and life history sensitivity for annual plants with a seed bank. Amer Natur 121:525–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitters CJT (1983) An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. 1. Estimation of competition effects. Neth J Agric Sci 31:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot MW, Biswell HH, Hormay AL (1939) Flutuations in the annual vegetation of California. Ecology 20:394–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenbath BR (1974) Biomass productivity of mixtures. Adv Agron 26:177–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagnon KA, Biswell MM (1943) Two types of broad-leaf Erodium in California. Madrono 7:118–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt AS (1974) Senescence and rejuvenation in ungrazed chalk grassland (Grassland B) in Breckland: the significance of litter and of moles. J Appl Ecol 11:1157–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu KK, Jain SK (1979) Population regulation in Bromus rubens and B. mollis: life cycle components and competition. Oecologia (Berl) 39:337–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Young JA, Evans RA, Raguse CA, Lawson JR (1981) Germinable seeds and periodicity of germination in annual grasslands. Hilgardia 49:30–67

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rice, K.J., Menke, J.W. Competitive reversals and environment-dependent resource partitioning in Erodium . Oecologia 67, 430–434 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384951

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384951

Keywords

Navigation