Skip to main content
Log in

Human psychophysics: Functional interpretation for contrast sensitivity versus spatial frequency curve

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hypothesis that neural processing in the human visual pathways compensates for both optical degradation as well as noise contamination at the photoreceptor level is introduced and shown to be consistent with the high frequency portion of the contrast sensitivity function for threshold detection of sinusoidal gratings in addition to the suprathreshold phenomenon of matching sinusoidal gratings of different spatial frequencies. This offers a unifying interpretation for why, at threshold conditions, the high spatial frequency portion of the image is blurred as severely by the nervous system as it is by the optics (e.g. Campbell and Green, 1965) while in extreme suprathreshold conditions the nervous system effectively deblurs the image (e.g. Georgeson and sullivan, 1975; Kulikowski, 1976). These conclusions do not necessitate a highly specific form of visual processing such as Fourier channeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashmore, F.J., Falk, G.: Dark noise in retinal bipolar cells and stability of rhodopsin in rods. Nature 270, 69–70 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Attneave, F.: In defense of Homunculi. In: Sensory communications, pp. 777–800. Rosenblith, W.A., ed. Boston: MIT Press 1961

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, H.B.: Three points about lateral inhibition. In: Sensory communications, pp. 800–802. Rosenblith, W.A., ed. Boston: MIT Press, New York: Wiley 1961

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, H.B.: The physical limits of visual discrimination. In: Photophysiology, Vol. 2, pp. 163–202. Giese, A.C., ed. New York: Academic Press 1964

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, C., Muncey, J.P.J., Ridley, R.M.: Stimulus specificity in the human visual system. Vision Res. 13, 1915–1931 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracewell, R.: The Fourier transform and its application. New York: McGraw-Hill 1965

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F.W., Green, D.G.: Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 181, 576–593 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F.W., Gubisch, R.W.: Optical quality of the human eye. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 186, 558–578 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F.W., Robson, J.G.: Application of Fourier analysis to the visability of gratings. J. Physiol. 197, 551–566 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, W.B., Root, W.L.: Introduction to random signals and noise. New York: McGraw-Hill 1958

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgeson, M.A., Sullivan, G.D.: Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 252, 627–656 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, G.A., Chesters, M.S.: Signal-transfer function in threshold and suprathreshold vision. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 990–998 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulikowski, J.J.: Effective contrast constancy and linearity of contrast sensation. Vision Res. 16, 1419–1431 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, T.D., Simon, E.J.: The relation between intercellular coupling and electrical noise in turtle photoreception. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 263, 257–286 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachmias, J.: Effect of exposure duration on visual contrast sensitivity with square wave gratings. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 421–427 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, E.L.: Introduction to statistical optics. Reading: Addison-Wesley 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Papoulis, A.: Probability, random variables and stochastic processes. New York: McGraw-Hill 1965

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff, F.: Mach bands? Quantitative studies on neural networks in the retina. San Francisco: Holden-Day 1965

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, J.G.: Receptive fields. In: Handbook of perception. Carterette, E.C., Freedman, M.P., eds.: New York: Academic Press 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade, O.H.: Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46, 721–739 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schober, H.A.W., Helz, R.: Contrast sensitivity of the human eye for square wave gratings. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 1986–1091 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, A.W., Laughlin, S.B., Stavenga, D.G.: Information capacity of eyes. Vision Res. 17, 1163–1175 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, A.W., Miller, W.H.: Photoreceptor diameter and spacing for highest resolving power. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 696–698 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ness, F.L., Bauman, M.A.: Spatial modulation transfer in the human eye. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 401–406 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, A., Mori, T., Nagata, S., Hiwatashi, K.: Spatial sinewave responses of the human visual system. Vision Res. 8, 1245–1263 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer, G.: Optical properties of vertebrate eyes. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. VII/2, pp. 449–482. Fuortes, M.G.F., ed. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1972a

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer, G.: Visual acuity and spatial modulation thresholds. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. VII/4, pp. 170–187. Jameson, D., Hurvich, L.M., eds. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1972b

    Google Scholar 

  • Yau, K.W., Lamb, T.D., Baylor, D.A.: Light induced fluctuations in membrane current of single toad rod outer segments. Nature 269, 78–80 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was conducted at Yale University, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, New Haven, Connecticut, USA, throughout which period A.W.S. was a John Simon Guggenheim fellow

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snyder, A.W., Srinivasan, M.V. Human psychophysics: Functional interpretation for contrast sensitivity versus spatial frequency curve. Biol. Cybernetics 32, 9–17 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337446

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337446

Keywords

Navigation