Skip to main content
Log in

Soil enzymatic response to addition of municipal solid-waste compost

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modifications of soil microbiological activity by the addition of municipal solid-waste compost were studied in laboratory incubations. Three composts were compared, one lumbricompost and two classical composts with different maturation times. Organic C mineralization and nine enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, peroxidase, cellulase, β-glucosidase, β-galactosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, protease, amidase, and urease) were determined in the composts and the amended soil. Initial enzyme activities varied in the soil according to the sampling date (winter or summer) and were greater in the composts than in the soil, except for urease. Generally, the youngest compost exhibited greater activity than the oldest one. In the amended soil, the composts did not increase enzyme activity in an additive way. Dehydrogenase, the only strictly endocellular enzyme, was the only one for which the activity in the amended soil increased significantly in proportion to the addition of compost. During the incubations, C mineralization and dehydrogenase activity were significantly correlated, indicating that dehydrogenase was a reliable indicator of global microbial activity. Peroxidase activity in the soil remained constant, but increased in the composts and amended soil. Addition of the oldest compost had no effect on the activity of the C cycle enzymes, but the youngest compost increased creased soil activity at the higher application rate. Enzymes of the N cycle were stimulated by all compost amendments, but the increase was only transient for amidase and urease. Lumbricomposting had no marked effect on compost enzyme activity, either before or during the incubation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander M (1977) Introduction to soil microbiology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartha R, Bordeleau L (1969) Cell-free peroxidases in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 1:139–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer J, DeChant L, Conditt M, Jones B (1993) Wet bag composting trial yields promising results. Biocycle 34:72–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer L, Wachendorf C, Elsner DC, Knabe R (1993) Suitability of dehydrogenase activity assay as an index of soil biological activity. Biol Fertil Soils 16:52–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd SA, Mortland MM (1990) Enzyme interactions with clays and clay-organic matter complexes. Soil Biochem 6:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink RH, Dubach P, Lynch DL (1960) Measurement of carbohydrates in soil hydrolyzates with anthrone. Soil Sci 89:157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns RG (1982) Enzyme activity in soil: location and possible role in microbial ecology. Soil Biol Biochem 14:423–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Businelli M, Perucci P, Patumi M, Giusquiani PL (1984) Chemical composition and enzymic activity of some worm casts. Plant Soil 80:417–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlot G (1961) Dosages colorimétriques des éléments minéraux. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaussod R, Nicolardot B, Catroux G (1986) Mesure en routine de la biomasse microbienne des sols par la méthode de fumigation au chloroforme. Sci Sol 2:201–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford DL, Doyle JD, Wang Z, Hendricks CW, Bentjen SA, Bolton H, Fredrickson JK, Bleakley BH (1993) Effects of lignin peroxidase-expressing recombinant, Streptomyces lividans TK23.1, on biogeochemical cycling and the numbers and activities of microorganisms in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:508–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels R, Hackenberg C, Stumpf U, Markus P, Krämer J (1993) Comparison of microbial dynamics in two Rhine valley soils under organic management. Biol Agric Hortic 9:325–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster JC, Zech W, Würdiger E (1993) Comparison of chemical and microbiological methods for the characterization of the maturity of composts from contrasting sources. Biol Fertil Soils 16:93–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberger WT, Dick WA (1983) Relationships between enzyme, activities and microbial growth and activity indices in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:945–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberger WT, Tabatabai MA (1980) Amidase activity in soils. I. Method of assay. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:282–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberger WT, Tabatabai MA (1981) Amidase activity in soils. III. Stability and distribution. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:333–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo-Lara F, Nogales R (1987) Effect of the application of town refuse compost on the soil-plant system: a review. Biol Wastes 19:35–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa F, Ceccanti B, Ciardi C (1992) Changes in ATP content, enzyme activity and inorganic nitrogen species during composting of organic wastes. Can J Soil Sci 72:243–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa F, Ceccanti B, Ganni A (1993a) Hydrolases in the organic matter fractions of sewage sludge: Changes with composting. Bioresour Technol 45:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa C, Ceccanti B, Masciandaro G, Ciardi C (1993b) A study of biochemical parameters of composted and fresh municipal wastes. Bioresour Technol 44:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa F, Ceccanti B, Masciandaro G, Calcinai M (1993c) Evaluation of the organic matter composition of raw and composted municipal wastes. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 39:99–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Giusquiani PL, Patumi M, Businelli M (1989) Chemical composition of fresh and composted urban waste. Plant Soil 116: 278–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Harada Y, Inoko A (1980) Relationship between cation-exchange capacity and degree of maturity of city refuse compost. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 26:353–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirai MF, Chanyasak V, Kubota H (1983) A standard measurement for compost maturity. Biocycle 24:54–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez EI, Garcia VP (1989) Evaluation of city refuse compost maturity: a review. Biol Wastes 27:115–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser P (1983) Analyse microbiologique des composts. Compost Information 13:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd JN, Butler JHA (1972) Short-term assays of soil proteolytic enzyme activities using proteins and dipeptide derivatives as substrates. Soil Biol Biochem 4:19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Loll MJ, Bollag JM (1983) Protein transformation in soil. Adv Agron 36:351–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens DA, Johanson JB, Frankenberger WT (1992) Production and persistence of soil enzymes with repeated addition of organic residues. Soil Sci 153:53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin A, Marinissen JCY (1993) Biological and physico-chemical processes in excrements of soil animals. Geoderma 56:331–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore S, Stein WH, (1954) A modified ninhydrin reagent for the photometric determination of amino acids and related compounds. J Biol Chem 211:907–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel JL, Guckert A, Nicolardot B, Benistant D, Catroux G, Germon JC (1986) Étude de l'évolution des caractéristiques physicochimiques et de la stabilité biologique des ordures ménagères au cours du compostage. Agronomie 6:693–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Pedrazzini F, Arcara PG, Piovanelli C (1979) Changes in amino acids, enzyme activities, and biomasses during soil microbial growth. Soil Sci 127:26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Muccini L, Ciardi C (1983) Microbial biomass and enzyme activities: Production and persistence. Soil Biol Biochem 15:679–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Grego S, Ceccanti B (1990) Ecological significance of the biological activity in soil. Soil Biochem 6:293–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Pancholy SK, Rice EL (1973) Soil enzymes in relation to old field succession: amylase, cellulase, invertase, dehydrogenase, and urease. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 37:47–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Perucci P (1990) Effect of the addition of municipal solid-waste compost on microbial biomass and enzyme activities in soil. Biol Fertil Soils 10:221–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Perucci P (1992) Enzyme activity and microbial biomass in a field soil amended with municipal refuse. Biol Fertil Soils 14:54–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinck LA, Allison FE (1961) Adsorption and release of urease by and from clay minerals. Soil Sci 91:183–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Skujins J (1967) Enzymes in soil. Soil Biochem 1: 371–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Skujins J (1978) History of abiontic soil enzyme research. In: Burns RG (eds) Soil enzymes. Academic Press, London, pp 1–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai MA (1982) Soil enzymes. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2, 2nd edn. Agronomy 9. Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wis, pp 903–947

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucconi F, Forte M, Monaco A, Bertoldi M de (1981) Biological evaluation of compost maturity. Biocycle 22:27–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Serra-Wittling, C., Houot, S. & Barriuso, E. Soil enzymatic response to addition of municipal solid-waste compost. Biol Fertil Soils 20, 226–236 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336082

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336082

Key words

Navigation