Skip to main content
Log in

Unpalatability of viceroy butterflies (Limenitis archippus) and their purported mimicry models, Florida queens (Danaus gilippus)

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Understanding the dynamics of defensive mimicry requires accurately characterizing the comparative palatability of putative models and mimics. The Florida viceroy butterfly (Limenitis archippus floridensis) is traditionally considered a palatable Batesian mimic of the purportedly distasteful Florida queen (Danaus gilippus berenice). I re-evaluated this established hypothesis by directly assessing palatability of viceroys and queens to red-winged blackbirds in a laboratory experiment. Representative Florida viceroys were surprisingly unpalatable to red-wings; only 40% of viceroy abdomens were entirely eaten (compared to 98% of control butterfly abdomens), and nearly one-third were immediately tasterejected after a single peck. In fact, the viceroys were significantly more unpalatable than representative Florida queens, of which 65% were eaten and 14% taste-rejected. Thus, viceroys and queens from the sampled populations exemplify Müllerian rather than Batesian mimicry, and the viceroy appears to be the stronger model. These findings prompt a reassessment of the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of this classic mimicry relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackery PR (1987) Hostplants and classification: a review of nymphalid butterflies. Biol J Linn Soc 33:95–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock J (1973) The feeding response of hand-reared red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) to a stinkbug (Euchistus conspersus). Am Midl Nat 89:307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Argus GW (1986) The genus Salix (Salicaceae) in the southeastern United States. Systematic Botany Monogr., vol. 9 (Amer. Soc. of Plant Taxonomists)

  • Bates HW (1962) Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley (Lepidoptera: Heliconidae). Trans Linn Soc Lond 23:495–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson WW (1977) On the supposed spectrum between Batesian and Müllerian mimicry. Evolution 31:454–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Boppré M (1984) Chemically mediated interactions between butterflies. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR (eds) The Biology of Butterflies. Academic Press, London, pp. 259–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MD (1980) Unpalatability as a defense strategy of Euphydryas phaeton. Evolution 34:586–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower JVZ (1958a) Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies. I. The Monarch, Danaus plexippus and Viceroy, Limenitis archippus. Evolution 12:32–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower JVZ (1958b) Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies. III. Danaus gilippus berenice and Limenitis archippus floridensis. Evolution 12:273–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower LP (1984) Chemical defence in buterflies. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR (eds) The Biology of Butterflies. Academic Press, London, pp. 109–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower LP (1988) Preface. In: Brower LP (ed) Mimicry and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower LP, Glazier SC (1975) Localization of heart poisons in the monarch butterfly. Science 188:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower LP, Edmunds M, Moffitt CM (1975) Cardenolide content and palatability of a population of Danaus chrysippus butterflies from West Africa. J Entom (A) 49:183–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JA (1985) Differences and similarities in cardenolide content of queen and monarch butterllies in Florida and their ecological and evolutionary implications. J Chem Ecol. 11:85–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppinger RP (1970) The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding behavior with reference to the evolution of warning coloration in butterflies. II. Reactions of naive birds to novel insects. Am Nat 104:323–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Day RW, Quinn GP (1989) Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecol Monogr 59:433–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards WRN (1978) Effect of salicin content on palatability of Populus foliage to opossum (Trichosurus vulpecula). New Zealand J Sci 21:103–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1958) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 2nd ed. Dover Pub.. NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford T (1988) The evolution of conspicuous coloration. Am Nat 131 (Suppl.):7–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe WH (1975) The butterflies of North America north of Mexico. Doubleday and Co., Garden City, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Huheey JE (1976) Studies in warning coloration and mimicry. VII. Evolutionary consequences of a Batesian-Müllerian spectrum: A model for Müllerian mimicry. Evolution 30:86–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Huheey JE (1980) Batesian and Müllerian mimicry: Semantic and substantive differences of opinion. Evolution 34:1212–1215

    Google Scholar 

  • Huheey JE (1984) Warning coloration and mimicry. In: Bell WJ, Cardé RT (eds), Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, Ltd., London, pp. 257–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Huheey JE (1988) Mathematical models of mimicry. Am Nat 131:S22-S41

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball CP (1965) Lepidoptera of Florida (Arthropods of Florida and neighboring land areas, vol. 1). Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm SB (1990) Mimicry: status of a classic evolutionary paradigm. Trends in Ecol, Evol 5:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason JR, Reidinger RF (1982) Observational learning of food aversions in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Auk 99:548–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers J, Brower LP (1969) A behavioural analysis of the courtship pheromone receptors of the queen butterfly, Danaus gilippus berenice. J Insect Physiol 15:2117–2130

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler PA, Krizek GO (1984) Butterflies East of the Great Plains. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasteels JM, Rowell-Rahier M, Braekman JC, Dupont A (1983) Salicin from host plant as precursor of salicylaldehyde in defensive secretion of Chrysomeline larvae. Physiol Entomol 8:307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt AP (1983) Evolution of North American admiral butterflies. Bull Entom Soc Am 29:10–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt AP, Coppinger RP, Brower LP (1971) Demonstration of the selective advantage of mimetic Limenitis butterflies presented to caged avian predators. Evolution 25:692–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Pliske TE (1975) Attraction of Lepidoptera to plants containing pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Environ Entom 4:455–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritland DB (1991a) Unpalatability of queen butterflies (Danaus gilippus) feeding on Sarcostemma clausum (Asclepiadaceae) in Florida. J Chem Ecol 17 (8) (in press)

  • Ritland DB (1991b) Reassessment of viceroy butterfly (Limenitis archippus) mimicry and an analysis of the ecological dynamics of mimicry. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritland DB (1991c) Revising a classic butterfly mimicry scenario: Demonstration of Müllerian mimicry between Florida viceroys (Limenitis archippus floridensis) and queens (Danaus gilippus berenice). Evolution 45:918–934

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritland DB, Brower LP (1991a) A reassessement of the mimicry relationship among viceroys, queens and monarchs in Florida. In: Malcolm SB, Zalucki MP (eds), Biology and Conservation of the Monarch Butterfly. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Contributions in Science (in press)

  • Ritland DB, Brower LP (1991b) The viceroy butterfly is not a Batesian mimic. Nature 350:497–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeske CN, Seiber JN, Brower LP, Moffitt CM (1976) Milkweed cardenolides and their comparative processing by monarch butterflies Danaus plexippus L.. Rec Adv Phytochem 10:93–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JA (1986) The Butterflies of North America: A Natural History and Field Guide. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Scudder SH (1870) Is mimicry advantageous? Nature 3:147

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JRG (1977) Butterfly mimicry: the genetical evolution of an adaptation. Evol Biol 10:163–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JRG (1987) The evolutionary dynamics of batesian and muellerian mimicry: similarities and differences. Ecol Entomol 12:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JRG, Kearney EP, Exton LS (1984) Mimicry and the Monte Carlo predator: the palatability spectrum and the origins of mimicry. Biol J Linn Soc 23:247–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart FA (1987) The monarch butterfly: international traveler. Nelson-Hall, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh BD, Riley CV (1869) Imitative butterflies. Am Entomol 1:189–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiklund C, Jarvi T (1982) Survival of distasteful insects after being attacked by naive birds: a reappraisal of the theory of aposematic coloration evolving through individual selection. Evolution 36:998–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Witthohn K, Naumann CM (1987) Cyanogenesis-a general phenomenon in the Lepidoptera? J Chem Ecol 13:1789–1809

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritland, D.B. Unpalatability of viceroy butterflies (Limenitis archippus) and their purported mimicry models, Florida queens (Danaus gilippus). Oecologia 88, 102–108 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328409

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328409

Key words

Navigation