Skip to main content
Log in

Cost of reproduction as reduced growth in genotypes of two congeneric species with contrasting life histories

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We examined the effect of reproduction on growth in 33 genotypes of Plantago major and 14 genotypes of P. rugelii. These two herbaceous perennials have contrasting life histories; P. major reproduces at a smaller size, and allocates a larger proportion of its biomass to reproduction, than P. rugelii. The effect of reproduction on frowth was determined experimentally using photoperiod manipulations to control level of reproduction. The difference in growth between reproductive treatments was divided by the difference in capsule weight to produce a measure of reproductive cost per g of capsule for genotypes of the two species. In both species there was substantial variation among genotypes in the effect of reproduction on growth. Much of this variation could be correlated with differences among genotypes in the extent of reproductive investment and plant size. Cost in terms of reduction in growth per g of capsule increased with reproductive investment in P. rugelii, and with plant size in P. major. We suggest the differences between species in timing and extent of reproduction are related to the differences between species in effect of reproduction on growth. Plantago rugelii may reproduce to a lesser extent than P. major because cost per g of capsule in terms of reduced vegetative biomass, increases with reproductive output in the former species, but not in the latter. Similarly, P. major may reproduce earlier than P. rugelii because cost per g of capsule increases with plant size in P. major, but not in P. rugelii.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman JD, Montalvo AM (1990) Short-and long-term limitations to fruit production in a tropical orchid. Ecology 71:263–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovics J (1980) Concept of resource allocation and partioning in plants. In: Staddon JER (ed), Limits to Action. The Allocation of Individual Behavior. Academic Press, N.Y. pp. 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA, Carlson RW (1979) Photosynthetic contribution of flowers and seeds to reproductive effort of an annual colonizer. New Phytologist 82:223–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA, Reekie EG (1985) The meaning and measurement of reproductive effort in plants. In: White J (ed) Studies on Plant Demography: A Festschrift for John L Harper. Academic Press, London. pp. 373–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA, Carlson RW, Harper JL (1979) Contribution to the reproductive effort by photosynthesis of flowers and fruits. Nature 279:554–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA, Chiariello NR, Coley PD, Pitelka LF (1987) Allocating resources to reproduction and defense. Bioscience 37:58–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt RL (1964) Carbohydrate utilization as a factor in plant growth. Austr J Biolog Science 17:867–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross KL (1981) Predictions of fate from rosette size in 4 bienniel plant species Verbascum thapsus, Oenothera biennis, Daucus carota and Tragopogon dubius. Oecologia 48:209–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorn WR (1974) The biology of Canadian weeds. 4. Plantago major and Plantago rugelii. Can J Plant Science 54:383–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorn WR, Cavers PB (1976) Population dynamics of the perennial herbs Plantago major L. and P. rugelii Decne. J Ecology 64:511–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorn WR, Cavers PB (1978) Resource allocation in young plants of two perennial species of Plantago. Can J Botany 56:2533–2537

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz CC, Schemske DW (1988) Demographic cost of reproduction in a neotropical herb: An experimental field study. Ecology 69:1741–1745

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurik TW (1983) Reproductive effort and CO2 dynamics of wild strawberry populations. Ecology 64:1329–1342

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurik TW (1985) Differential costs of sexual and vegetative reproduction in wild strawberry populations. Oecologia 66:394–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Miao SL, Bazzaz FA (1990) Response to nutrient pulses of two colonizers requiring different disturbance frequency. Ecology 76:2166–2178

    Google Scholar 

  • Neales TF, Incoll LO (1968) The control of leaf photosynthesis rate by the level of assimilate concentration in the leaf: A review of the hypothesis. Botan Rev 34:107–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosberger J, Humphries EC (1965) The influence of removing tubers on dry matter production and net assimilation of potato plants. Annals Botany 29:579–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB (1979) Reproductive effort in annual and perennial species of Plantago. Am Natural 114:51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Antonovics J (1982) Experimental ecological genetics in Plantago. VII. Reproductive effort in populations of P. lanceolata L. Evolution 34:742–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Hall P (1990) Costs of reproduction in the Pink Lady's Slipper orchid: A four-year experimental study. Am Natural 136:638–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Reekie EG, Bazzaz FA (1987a) Reproductive effort in plants. 1. Carbon allocation to reproduction. Am Natural 129:876–896

    Google Scholar 

  • Reekie EG, Bazzaz FA (1987b) Reproductive effort in plants. 3. Effect of reproduction on vegetative activity. Am Natural 129:907–919

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow AA, Whigham DF (1989) Costs of flower and fruit production in Tipularia discolor (Orchidaceae). Ecology 70:1286–1292

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Stewart AJA (1981) The measurement and meaning of reproductive effort in plants. Am Natural 117:205–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Werk K, Ehleringer JR (1983) Photosynthesis by flowers in Encelia farimosa and Encelia california (Asteraceae). Oecologia 57:311–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner PA (1975) Predictions of fate from rosette size in teasel (Dipsacus fullonum L.). Oecologia 20:197–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson MF (1983) Plant reproductive ecology. Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reekie, E.G., Bazzaz, F.A. Cost of reproduction as reduced growth in genotypes of two congeneric species with contrasting life histories. Oecologia 90, 21–26 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317804

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317804

Key words

Navigation