Skip to main content
Log in

Centering on figurative features during the comprehension of sentences describing scenes

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Subjects were asked to read sentences which described scenes containing objects. In the scene described in each sentence, a specific part of a particular object was necessarily implied as having an important role. The object was named but none of its parts were. The assumption was that the subjects, while processing the sentence and immediately afterward, would cognitively “center” on the important part, as a function of the context created by the sentence. Immediately after reading the sentence, the subjects were probed with a picture of either the important part, or of an unimportant part of the object. Judgments of the compatibility of this picture probe with the sentence were faster for pictures of important parts than for pictures of other parts. This was taken as supporting the hypothesis of cognitive centration. In a second experiment, in which words were used as probes instead of pictures, a purely verbal process to account for the results was ruled out. In a third experiment, subjects were given instructions to intentionally form visual images of the scenes described by the sentences. In this case, overall response times to the picture probes were shorter than in the absence of such instructions, but this decrease was greater for pictures of unimportant parts. This finding was interpreted as showing that imagery instructions increase the rate of activation of features to varying degrees as a function of the previous level of activation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashcraft, M.A. (1978). Property norms for typical and atypical items from 17 categories: A description and discussion. Memory and Cognition, 6, 227–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, J.R., Bransford, J.D., Franks, J.J., McCarrell, N.S., & Nitsch, K. (1974). Comprehension and semantic flexibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 471–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L.W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory and Cognition, 10, 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belmore, S.M., Yates, J.M., Bellack, D.R., Jones, S.N., & Rosenquist, S.E. (1982). Drawing inferences from concrete and abstract sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 338–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, T.H., McCauley, C., Sperber, R.D., & Parmelee, C.M. (1982). Words, pictures, and priming: On semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 757–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.H., & Clark, E.V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M. (1979). Les images mentales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M. (1982). Images and semantic representations. In J.-F. Le Ny & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Language and comprehension (pp. 17–27). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M. (1983). Valeur d'imagerie et composition sémantique: analyse de deux échantillons de substantifs. Cahiers de Psychologie cognitive, 3, 175–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M. (1984). Propriétés figuratives et non figuratives dans l'analyse de concepts. L'Année psychologique, 84, 327–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T.A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosher, B.A., & Corbett, A.T. (1982). Instrument inferences and verb schemata. Memory and Cognition, 10, 531–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, J.K., & Glass, A.L. (1981). Reading and listening to high and low imagery sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K.I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 465–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, A.L., Millen, D.R., Beck, L.G., & Eddy, J.K. (1985). Representation of images in sentence verification. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 442–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J. (1982). Representation of concepts and the classification of objects. In F. Klix, J. Hoffmann, & E. van der Meer (Eds.), Cognitive research in psychology (pp. 72–89). amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J., Denis, M., & Ziessler, M. (1983). Figurative features and the construction of visual images. Psychological Research, 45, 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D.I., & Lupker, S.J. (1983). Semantic priming of pictures and words: A levels of processing approach. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N., Gibbs, G., & de Mowbray, J. (1978). Meaning, amount of processing, and memory for words. Memory and Cognition, 6, 372–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, A.N. (1978). Differences in the saliency of sensory features elicited by words. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 32, 156–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, A.N. (1981). Knowing about the sensory properties of objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Ny, J.-F. (1979). La sémantique psychologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Ny, J.-F., Achour, L., Carfantan, M., & Verstiggel, J.-C. (1983). Elective decay of meaning in working memory and the process of discourse comprehension. In G. Rickheit & M. Bock (Eds.), Psycholinguistic studies in language processing (pp. 101–118). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Ny, J.-F., Carfantan, M., & Verstiggel, J.-C. (1982). Accessibility from working memory and role of reprocessing in sentence comprehension. In J.-F. Le Ny & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Language and comprehension (pp. 123–134). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKoon, G. (1981). The representation of pictures in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 216–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D.L., Reed, V.S., & McEvoy, C.L. (1977). Learning to order pictures and words: A model of sensory and semantic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 485–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A., & Begg, I. (1971). Imagery and comprehension latencies as a function of sentence concreteness and structure. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 408–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrig, W., & Kintsch, W. (1985). Propositional and situational representations of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 503–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreuder, R., Flores d'Arcais, G.B., & Glazenborg, G. (1984). Perceptual and conceptual similarity effects in semantic priming. Psychological Research, 45, 339–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M.S., Waters, G.S., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 12, 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J.G. (1984). Concepts and their surface representations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabossi, P. (1982). Sentential context and the interpretation of unambiguous words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabossi, P., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1980). Linguistic context and the priming of semantic information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 595–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 169–193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Denis, M., Le Ny, JF. Centering on figurative features during the comprehension of sentences describing scenes. Psychol. Res 48, 145–152 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309162

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309162

Keywords

Navigation