Summary
Subjects were asked to read sentences which described scenes containing objects. In the scene described in each sentence, a specific part of a particular object was necessarily implied as having an important role. The object was named but none of its parts were. The assumption was that the subjects, while processing the sentence and immediately afterward, would cognitively “center” on the important part, as a function of the context created by the sentence. Immediately after reading the sentence, the subjects were probed with a picture of either the important part, or of an unimportant part of the object. Judgments of the compatibility of this picture probe with the sentence were faster for pictures of important parts than for pictures of other parts. This was taken as supporting the hypothesis of cognitive centration. In a second experiment, in which words were used as probes instead of pictures, a purely verbal process to account for the results was ruled out. In a third experiment, subjects were given instructions to intentionally form visual images of the scenes described by the sentences. In this case, overall response times to the picture probes were shorter than in the absence of such instructions, but this decrease was greater for pictures of unimportant parts. This finding was interpreted as showing that imagery instructions increase the rate of activation of features to varying degrees as a function of the previous level of activation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashcraft, M.A. (1978). Property norms for typical and atypical items from 17 categories: A description and discussion. Memory and Cognition, 6, 227–232.
Barclay, J.R., Bransford, J.D., Franks, J.J., McCarrell, N.S., & Nitsch, K. (1974). Comprehension and semantic flexibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 471–481.
Barsalou, L.W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory and Cognition, 10, 82–93.
Belmore, S.M., Yates, J.M., Bellack, D.R., Jones, S.N., & Rosenquist, S.E. (1982). Drawing inferences from concrete and abstract sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 338–351.
Carr, T.H., McCauley, C., Sperber, R.D., & Parmelee, C.M. (1982). Words, pictures, and priming: On semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 757–777.
Clark, H.H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.
Clark, H.H., & Clark, E.V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Denis, M. (1979). Les images mentales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Denis, M. (1982). Images and semantic representations. In J.-F. Le Ny & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Language and comprehension (pp. 17–27). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Denis, M. (1983). Valeur d'imagerie et composition sémantique: analyse de deux échantillons de substantifs. Cahiers de Psychologie cognitive, 3, 175–202.
Denis, M. (1984). Propriétés figuratives et non figuratives dans l'analyse de concepts. L'Année psychologique, 84, 327–345.
van Dijk, T.A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Dosher, B.A., & Corbett, A.T. (1982). Instrument inferences and verb schemata. Memory and Cognition, 10, 531–539.
Eddy, J.K., & Glass, A.L. (1981). Reading and listening to high and low imagery sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 333–345.
Forster, K.I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 465–495.
Glass, A.L., Millen, D.R., Beck, L.G., & Eddy, J.K. (1985). Representation of images in sentence verification. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 442–465.
Hoffmann, J. (1982). Representation of concepts and the classification of objects. In F. Klix, J. Hoffmann, & E. van der Meer (Eds.), Cognitive research in psychology (pp. 72–89). amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hoffmann, J., Denis, M., & Ziessler, M. (1983). Figurative features and the construction of visual images. Psychological Research, 45, 39–54.
Irwin, D.I., & Lupker, S.J. (1983). Semantic priming of pictures and words: A levels of processing approach. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 45–60.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P.N., Gibbs, G., & de Mowbray, J. (1978). Meaning, amount of processing, and memory for words. Memory and Cognition, 6, 372–375.
Katz, A.N. (1978). Differences in the saliency of sensory features elicited by words. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 32, 156–179.
Katz, A.N. (1981). Knowing about the sensory properties of objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 39–49.
Le Ny, J.-F. (1979). La sémantique psychologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Le Ny, J.-F., Achour, L., Carfantan, M., & Verstiggel, J.-C. (1983). Elective decay of meaning in working memory and the process of discourse comprehension. In G. Rickheit & M. Bock (Eds.), Psycholinguistic studies in language processing (pp. 101–118). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
Le Ny, J.-F., Carfantan, M., & Verstiggel, J.-C. (1982). Accessibility from working memory and role of reprocessing in sentence comprehension. In J.-F. Le Ny & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Language and comprehension (pp. 123–134). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
McKoon, G. (1981). The representation of pictures in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 216–221.
Nelson, D.L., Reed, V.S., & McEvoy, C.L. (1977). Learning to order pictures and words: A model of sensory and semantic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 485–497.
Paivio, A., & Begg, I. (1971). Imagery and comprehension latencies as a function of sentence concreteness and structure. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 408–412.
Perrig, W., & Kintsch, W. (1985). Propositional and situational representations of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 503–518.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.
Schreuder, R., Flores d'Arcais, G.B., & Glazenborg, G. (1984). Perceptual and conceptual similarity effects in semantic priming. Psychological Research, 45, 339–354.
Seidenberg, M.S., Waters, G.S., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 12, 315–328.
Snodgrass, J.G. (1984). Concepts and their surface representations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 3–22.
Tabossi, P. (1982). Sentential context and the interpretation of unambiguous words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 79–90.
Tabossi, P., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1980). Linguistic context and the priming of semantic information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 595–603.
Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 169–193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Denis, M., Le Ny, JF. Centering on figurative features during the comprehension of sentences describing scenes. Psychol. Res 48, 145–152 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309162
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309162