Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urethral catheterization in spinal surgery: a randomized prospective study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Résumé

Une étude prospective randomisée chez les patients opérés pour une arthrodèse rachidienne a permis d'étudier l'effet du sondage uréthral à demeure sur les complications urinaires. Deux groupes de patients ont été formés; 16 d'entre eux ont reçu une sonde urinaire à demeure et 16 autres n'ont pas été sondés. Tous les patients ont été en cas de nécessité, sondés de manière intermittente dans la phase postopératoire. Sept des patients du groupe sondé présentaient des cultures positives à un taux ≥100000 bactéries vivantes/ml, contre deux patients seulement dans le groupe non sondé (ns). Un autre groupe de 4 patients du groupe non sondé présentaient des cultures positives à un taux ≥10000 bactéries vivantes/ml. Treize patients du groupe sondé et 14 patients du groupe non sondé présentaient des tests à la bandelette positifs. La plus grande quantité d'urine recueillie chez chaque patient lors d'un cathétérisme intermittent ne différait pas de manière significative entre les groupes. Cependant, chez trois patients du groupe non sondé les volumes dépassaient 1000 ml. Ainsi, quel qu'ait été le traitement, 84% des patients ont eu une surveillance bactériurique par des tests à la bandelette. Le sondage urinaire à demeure au cours de l'opération ne semble pas provoquer plus de complications infectieuses que l'absence de drainage vésical peropératoire; les avantages liés à la diminution du risque de lésion vésicale par distension et à la surveillance plus précise de l'équilibre liquidien incitent à utiliser ce type de cathétérisme.

Summary

In a prospective randomized study the effect of the use of an intraoperative indwelling urethral catheter (IUC) on urinary complications was investigated in patients undergoing spinal fusion. Two groups were formed; 16 patients received an intraoperative IUC and 16 patients had no intraoperative catheter (NC). All patients were, if necessary, intermittently catheterized in the postoperative period. Seven of the patients in the IUC group had positive cultures, defined as ≥100000 CFU/ml, compared with two patients in the NC group (n.s.). Another four patients in the NC group had cultures ≥10000 CFU/ml. Thirteen patients in the IUC group and 14 patients in the NC group had positive dip slides. The largest received urine volume in each patient at one intermittent catheterization did not differ significantly between the groups. However, in three patients in the NC group the volumes exceeded 1000 ml. Thus, irrespective of treatment dip slides showed bacteriuria in 84% of the patients. Perioperative indwelling catheters do not seem to cause many more infection complications than no bladder drainage during surgery, and the advantages of reduced risk of bladder distension injury and more accurate monitoring of fluid balance suggest their use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bartzen PJ, Hafferty FW (1987) Pelvic laparotomy without an indwelling catheter. A retrospective review of 949 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:1426–1432

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blaivas JG, Ferrone JD (1978) Urologic complications in the critically ill orthopedic patient. Orthop Clin North Am 9:825–844

    Google Scholar 

  3. Britt MR, Garibaldi RA, Miller WA, Hebertson RM, Burke JP (1977) Antimicrobial prophylaxis for catheter-associated bacteriuria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 11:240–243

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bultitude MI, Eykyn S (1973) The relationship between the urethral flora and urinary infection in the catheterised male. Br J Urol 45:678–683

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burke JP, Garibaldi RA, Britt MR, Jacobson JA, Conti M, Alling DW (1981) Prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Efficacy of daily meatal care regimens. Am J Med 70:655–658

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flechner SM, Conley SB, Brewer ED, Benson GS, Corriere JN (1983) Intermittent clean catheterization: an alternative to diversion in continent transplant recipients with lower urinary tract dysfunction. J Urol 130:878–881

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fowler JE Jr, Marshall V (1983) Nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Infect Surg 2:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Dickman ML, Smith CB (1974) Factors predisposing to bacteriuria during indwelling urethral catheterization. N Engl J Med 291:215–219

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Britt MR, Miller WA, Smith CB (1980) Meatal colonization and catheter-associated bacteriuria. N Engl J Med 303:316–318

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hollander M, Wolfe D (1979) Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuhlemeier KV, Stover SL, Lloyd LK (1985) Prophylactic antibacterial therapy for preventing urinary tract infections in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol 134:514–517

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maizels M, Schaeffer AJ (1980) Decreased incidence of bacteriuria associated with periodic instillations of hydrogen peroxide into the urethral catheter drainage bag. J Urol 123:841–845

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez OV, Civetta JM, Anderson K, Roger S, Murtha M, Malinin T (1986) Bacteriuria in the catheterized surgical intensive care patient. Crit Care Med 14:188–191

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meares EM (1985) Urinary catheters and nosocomial infection. Urology [Suppl]26:12–14

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mountokalakis T, Skounakis M, Tselentis J (1985) Short-term versus prolonge systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in patients treated with indwelling catheters. J Urol 134:506–508

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schaffer AJ (1986) Catheter-associated bacteriuria. Urol Clin North Am 13:735–747

    Google Scholar 

  17. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 125–128

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stamm WE (1975) Guidelines for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Ann Intern Med 82:386–390

    Google Scholar 

  19. Timoney AG, Shaw PJ (1990) Urological outcome in female patients with spinal cord injury: the effectiveness of intermittent mittent catheterisation. Paraplegia 28:556–563

    Google Scholar 

  20. Turck M, Stamm W (1981) Nosocomial infection of the urinary tract. In: Dixon RE (ed) Nosocomial infections. Yorke Medical, New York, pp 91–94

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wyndaele JJ, De Sy WA, Claessens H (1985) Evaluation of different methods of bladder drainage used in the early care of spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia 23:18–26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Normelli, H., Aaro, S., Hedlund, R. et al. Urethral catheterization in spinal surgery: a randomized prospective study. Eur Spine J 2, 132–135 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301409

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301409

Mots-clés

Key words

Navigation