Skip to main content
Log in

Flock size, food dispersion, and the feeding behavior of crossbills

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Feeding rates of five captive red crossbills (Loxia curvirostra) were measured when they were foraging alone, and in flocks of two or four on three seed dispersion patterns. On the most strongly clumped seed dispersion, individuals had higher mean feeding rates and the smallest probability of starvation when in flocks of two than when alone or in flocks of four. Individuals in flocks of four had higher feeding rates on the weakly clumped seed dispersion than on the uniform and more clumped seed dispersions; there were no food finding benefits gained from flocking on the uniform seed dispersion and aggression increased as food became more clumped. Most recent work has assumed that flocking results in higher feeding rates only because time spent vigilant is reduced. Crossbills, however, did not visit more cones per unit time as flock size increased, as would be expected if less time was spent vigilant. Thus, any reductions in vigilance as flock size increased were countered by increases in other behaviours, such as those related to aggression. Consequently, the higher mean feeding rates of crossbills in flocks than when solitary is not attributable to reduced vigilance. The increase in mean and the decline in variance of feeding rates occurred because crossbills in flocks found good patches earlier, and possible by spending less time assessing poor patches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker MC, Belcher CS, Deutsch LC, Sherman GL, Thompson DB (1981) Foraging success in junco flocks and the effects of social hierarchy. Anim Behav 29:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkman CW (1987) Food profitability and the foraging ecology of crossbills. Ecol Monogr 57:251–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkman CW (1988) Intake rate maximization and the foraging behaviour of crossbills. Ornis Scand (in press)

  • Caraco T (1979) Time budgeting and group size: A test of theory. Ecology 60:618–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T (1981) Risk-sensitivity and foraging groups. Ecology 62:527–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T, Martindale S, Pulliam HR (1980) Avian flocking in the presence of a predator. Nature (London) 285:400–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T, Pulliam HR (1984) Sociality and survivorship in animals exposed to predation. In: Price PW, Slobodchikoff CN, Gaud WS (eds) A new ecology: Novel approaches to interactive systems. Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 279–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark CW, Mangel M (1984) Foraging and flocking strategies: information in an uncertain environment. Am Nat 123:626–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark CW, Mangel M (1986) The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theor Popul Biol 30:45–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J, Rosander B (1987) Starvation risk and flock size of the social forager: when there is a flocking cost. Theor Popul Biol 3:167–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald PW (1986) Influence of asymmetries n resource quality and age on aggression and dominance in black-chinned hummingbirds. Anim Behav 33:705–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Glück E (1987) Benefits and costs of social foraging and optimal flock size in goldfinches (Carduelis carduelis). Ethology 74:65–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight SK, Knight RL (1986) Vigilance patterns of bald eagles feeding in groups. Auk 103:263–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1974) Colonial nesting and social feeding as stategies of exploiting food resources in the great blue heron (Ardea herodias). Behaviour 51:99–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1979) Foraging strategies and their social significance. In: Marler PR, Vandenbergh JG (eds) Social behavior and communication. Plenum Press, New York, pp 225–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, MacRoberts MH, Cullen JM (1972) Flocking and feeding in the great tit Parus major — An experimental study. Ibis 114:507–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Lendrem DW (1984) Flocking, feeding and predation risk: absolute and instantaneous feeding rates. Anim Behav 32:298–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1967) The adaptive radiation and feeding ecology of some British finches. Ibis 109:33–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1973) On the advantage of flocking. J theor Biol 38:419–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1976) The principles of optimal behaviour and the theory of communities. In: Bateson PPG, Klopfer PH (eds) Perspectives in ethology, vol III. Plenum Press, New York, pp 311–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR, Millikan GC (1982) Social organization in the nonbreeding season. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds) Avian biology, vol VI. Academic Press, New York, pp 169–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR, Pyke GH, Caraco T (1982) The scanning behavior of juncos: A game-theoretical approach. J theor Biol 95:89–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller GB (1972) The Serengeti lion. University Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Charnov EL (1982) Optimal foraging: some simple stochastic models. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:251–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan KA (1984) The advantages of social foraging in downy woodpeckers. Anim Behav 32:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson WA, Vertinsky I, Krebs JR (1974) The survival value of flocking in birds: a simulation model. J Anim Ecol 43:785–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Tordoff HB (1954) Social organization and behavior in a flock of captive, nonbreeding red crossbills. Condor 56:346–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsberg GE (1983) Avian ecological energetics. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds) Avian biology, vol VII. Academic Press, New York, pp 161–220

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benkman, C.W. Flock size, food dispersion, and the feeding behavior of crossbills. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23, 167–175 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300351

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300351

Keywords

Navigation