Skip to main content
Log in

Masculinity and femininity in middle childhood: Developmental and factor analyses

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developmental differences in children's self-perceptions of masculinity and femininity during the middle childhood period were investigated in English-speaking children from Grades 2–7 (N=517). The majority of participants were Caucasian and from middle socioeconomic families. The multidimensionality of masculinity and femininity was also examined. The Children's Personal Attributes Questionnaire (CPAQ), a standardized self-report instrument, was used to assess masculinity (instrumentality) and femininity (socioemotional expressiveness). Developmental differences were found within a cross-sectional design, with a decrease in feminine responding and an increase in masculine responding. At the item level, however, both boys and girls were relatively selective and limited in the items that had a grade effect. Interestingly, greater symmetry was observed between boys' masculine and feminine scores than between girls' scores. Furthermore, fewer boys had predominantly masculine responding than girls had predominantly feminine responding. Factor analysis provided initial support for the presence of three factors—interpersonal orientation, leadership, and emotionality—which appear to have greater specificity and reflect more distinct subtraits than the original scales of the CPAQ. The results of the present study suggest that meaningful developmental changes occur during the middle childhood period, and that a single summary score for masculinity or femininity ignores variations in gender-typed subtraits and thus raises both scoring and interpretation concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blishen, B. R., & McRoberts, M. A. (1976). A revised socioeconomic index for occupations in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 13, 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H. (1973). Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives. American Psychologist, 28, 512–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H. (1983). Differential premises arising from differential socialization: Some conjectures. Child Development, 54, 1335–1354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-Femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. W., Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982). Sex-trait stereotypes in the self- and peer descriptions of third grade children. Sex Roles, 8, 315–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S., Stockard, J., Johnson, M., & Williams, S. (1987). Measuring gender differences: The expressive dimension and critique of androgyny scales. Sex Roles, 17, 375–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A., & Halberstadt, A. G. (1980). Masculinity and femininity in children: Development of the Children's Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Developmental Psychology, 16, 270–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, A. C. (1983). Sex-typing. In E. M. Heatherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Socialization. personality. and social development (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, P. A., & Boswell, S. L. (1984). Sex-role development and the one-child family. In T. Falbo (Ed.), The single-child family. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. E., Baker, L. A., & Jacklin, C. N. (1989). Masculinity and femininity in twin children: Genetic and environmental factors. Child Development, 60, 1475–1485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J., & Tetenbaum, T. J. (1979). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, D. N. (1988). Sex-role development. In M. H. Bornstein & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvern, L. E. (1977). Children's sex-role preferences: Stronger among girls than boys. Sex Roles, 3, 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvern, L. E., & Katz, P. A. (1986). Gender roles and adjustment in elementary-school children: A multidimensional approach. Sex Roles, 14, 181–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research: Normal personality processes (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43. (Ms. No. 617)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart, T. & Turiel, E. (1985). Children's concepts of cross-gender activities. Child Development, 56, 1241–1252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. J. (1983). Providing a concrete context for sex role endorsements in adolescents: Some measurement considerations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.

  • Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E., Lorge, I., & Wright, E. (1970). Canadian Cognitive Abilities Test. Toronto: Thomas Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, B. E., Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1988). Parental agreement on child rearing during early childhood and the psychological characteristics of adolescents. Child Development, 59, 1020–1033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. B., Woodmansee, D. B., & Williams, J. E. (1977). Sex stereotypes and transactional analysis theory: An empirical study. Transactional Analysis Journal, 7, 266–274.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We would like to thank the children, parents, and teachers of the three schools that participated in the study. We also thank Amy Halberstadt and two anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Nada Absi-Semaan is now at the Informatics Branch of Labour Canada and Corinne Freeman is at the Dufferin-Peel Separate School Board.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Absi-Semaan, N., Crombie, G. & Freeman, C. Masculinity and femininity in middle childhood: Developmental and factor analyses. Sex Roles 28, 187–206 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299280

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299280

Keywords

Navigation