Skip to main content
Log in

Attitudes towards single women

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical studies of attitudes towards, and the sociopsychological characteristics of single women have been neglected by social scientists. As a minority group, subject to normative judgements of their sex-role behavior, single women are vulnerable to prejudicial evaluations by married people of both sexes. The present study investigated aspects of the social environment which have positive or negative consequences for single women. A survey was conducted of N=48 male and female married subjects in an Australian city. Major findings were that (a) married people have little or no contact with single women; (b) males tend to be more negative in their evaluations of single women than females; and (c) most females can allow for the possibility of a major sex role other than that involving marriage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. The single woman in today's society: A reappraisal. In H. Wortis & C. Rabinowitz (Eds.), The women's movement: Social and psychological perspectives. New York: Wiley, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, M. Single blessedness. London: Heinemann, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. Preliminary characteristics. Census of population and housing, 1976.

  • Bergquist, L. How come a nice girl like you isn't married? In S. Safilios-Rothschild (Ed.), Toward a sociology of women. Lexington, Mass.: Xerox College Publishing, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. Coercive pronatalism and American population policy. International Institute of Internation Studies, University of California. (Undated)

  • Erikson, E. H. Identity, youth and crisis. London: Faber, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, S. The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. London: Granada Publishing, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, H. M. Women as a minority group. Social Forces, 1951, 30, 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S. The future role of women. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1973, 408, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M., & Ziegler, M. Research projects in social psychology. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole Publishing, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, M. Arriving at “truth” by definition: The case of stereotype inaccuracy. Social Problems, 1973, 20, 431–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. (Ed.). The other half: Women in Australian society. Ringwood, Victoria: Penguin, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. Family, socialisation and interaction process. New York: Free Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolk, Y., & Brotherton, P. L. The spinster stereotype: A demographic refutation? Melbourne Psychology Reports. Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, 1979.

  • Summers, A. Damned whores and God's police: The colonisation of women in Australia. Ringwood, Victoria: Penguin, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dusen, R. A., & Sheldon, E. B. The changing status of American women: A life cycle perspective. American Psychologist, 1976, 31, 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stolk, Y., Brotherton, P. Attitudes towards single women. Sex Roles 7, 73–78 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290900

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290900

Keywords

Navigation