Abstract
This study examined the relation between dimensions of sex role self schema (assessed by four factor scores of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Instrumentality, Expressiveness, Autonomy, and Masculinity-Femininity) and psychological adjustment (assessed by the Symptom Checklist-90-R) in 366 homosexuals (230 males and 136 females) and 241 heterosexuals (124 males and 117 females). All subjects were in a cohabitating relationship. Homosexuals and heterosexuals did not differ in psychological adjustment, but men were found to be more distressed by paranoid symptoms than women. Dimensions of sex role self schema varied by an interaction between gender and sexual orientation. Gender differences on Instrumentality, Expressiveness, and Masculinity-Femininity were more pronounced for heterosexuals than for homosexuals. Further, homosexual women were more Instrumental than heterosexual women, while homosexual and heterosexual men were equivalent; homosexual men were more Expressive than heterosexual men, while homosexual and heterosexual women were equivalent; and the discrepancy between homosexual and heterosexual women's Masculinity-Femininity score was greater than that between homosexual and heterosexual men. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that only education and the Autonomy dimension of sex role self scheme were the best nonredundant predictors of psychological adjustment, although the relations were weak. Findings are discussed in terms of current theory and research on sex role self schemas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, A. P., & Weinberg, M. S. Homosexualities: A study of diversity among men and women. New York: Simon and Shuster, 1978.
Bell, A. P., Weinberg, M. S., & Hammersmith, S. K. Sexual preference: Its development in men and women. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1981.
Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S. L. On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196–205.
Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 1981, 88, 354–364.
Bloom, B. L., Asher, S. J., & White, S. W. Marital disruption as a stressor. Psychological Bulletin, 1978, 85, 867–894.
Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. American couples. New York: William Morrow, 1983.
Costos, D. Sex role identity in young adults: Its parental antecedents and relation to ego development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 50, 602–611.
Derogatis, L. SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring and procedures manual. Towson, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research, 1983.
Feather, N. T. Masculinity, femininity, self esteem, and clinical depression. Sex Roles, 1985, 12, 491–500.
Feldman, S. S., Biringen, Z. C., & Nash, S. C. Fluctuations of sex-related self-attributions as a function of stage of family life cycle. Developmental Psychology, 1981, 17, 24–35.
Gaudreau, P. Factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 299–302.
Harry, J. Defeminization and adult psychological well-being among male homosexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1983, 12, 1–19.
Huston, A. C. Sex typing. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. New York: Wiley, 1983.
Kiecoult-Glaser, J. K., Fisher, L. D., Ogrocki, P., Stout, J. C. Speicher, C. E., & Glaser, R. Marital quality, marital disruption, and immune function. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1987, 49, 13–34.
Kurdek, L. A., & Schmitt, J. P. Interaction of sex role self-concept with relationship quality and relationship beliefs in married, heterosexual cohabiting, gay, and lesbian couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51, 365–370. (a)
Kurdek, L. A., & Schmitt, J. P. Relationship quality of partners in heterosexual married, heterosexual cohabiting, gay and lesbian couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51, 711–720. (b)
Larsen, R. J., & Seidman, E. Gender scheme theory and sex role inventories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 50, 205–211.
Larson, P. C. Sexual identity and self-concept. Journal of Homosexuality, 1981, 7, 15–32.
Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A., & Butcher, J. Masculinity, femininity and androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 428–439.
Lynch, J. M., & Reilly, M. E. Role relationships: Lesbian perspectives. Journal of Homosexuality, 1986, 12, 53–70.
Marsh, H. W., & Myers, M. Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny: A methodological and theoretical critique. Sex Roles, 1986, 8, 397–430.
Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F. A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 1981, 52, 1119–1134.
Morin, S. F. Heterosexual bias in psychological research on lesbianism and male homosexuality. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 629–637.
Orlofsky, J. L., & O'Heron, C. A. Stereotypic and nonstereotypic sex role trait and behavior orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 52, 1034–1042.
Pedhazur, E. J., & Tetenbaum, T. J. Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 996–1016.
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95–112.
Schullo, S. A., & Alperson, B. L. Interpersonal phenomenology as a function of sexual orientation, sex, sentiment, and trait categories in long term dyadic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 47, 983–1002.
Sears, D. O. College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51, 515–530.
Singorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1986, 100, 207–228.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. Masculinity and femininity. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1978.
Stokes, K., Kilmann, P. R., & Wanlass, R. L. Sexual orientation and sex role conformity. Archives of Sexual behavior, 1983, 12, 427–433.
Suppe, F. The Bell and Weinberg study: Future priorities for research on homosexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 1981, 6, 69–97.
Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 1982, 92, 347–366.
Van Wyk, P. H., & Geist, C. S. Psychosocial development of heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1984, 13, 505–544.
Whitley, B. E., Jr. Sex role orientation and self esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 1983, 44, 773–786.
Whitley, B. E., Jr. Sex role orientation and psychological well-being: Two meta-analyses. Sex Roles, 1985, 12, 207–225.
Whitley, B. E., Jr., McHugh, M. C., & Frieze, I. H. Assessing the theoretical models for sex differences in causal attributions of success and failure. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I would like to thank the participants in this study for their time and effort. I also extend my appreciation to Glenna Darnell-Goetschel, Andy Riggle, and Connie Kuhn for their assistance in data entry, and to Mike Hennessy and an anonymous reviewer of this journal for constructive comments on an earlier draft of the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kurdek, L.A. Sex role self schema and psychological adjustment in coupled homosexual and heterosexual men and women. Sex Roles 17, 549–562 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287735
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287735