Skip to main content
Log in

Sex roles and fertility in college women

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was conducted to examine the relationship of sex-role acceptance to actual and desired fertility. Two samples of women (105 undergraduates and 40 members of a women's organization) were administered the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and a questionnaire which assessed the women's behavioral acceptance of traditional female sex roles. The behavioral measures were sex-typed college major for the undergraduates and employment status for the women's organization sample. In addition, vocational interests were measured and related to fertility for the women's organization sample. Multiple regression analyses indicated that behavioral measures of sex-role acceptance accounted for more variance in predicting desired and actual fertility than did the Bem Sex-Role Inventory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. Sex-role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 634–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. Sex-typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., Martyna, W., & Watson, C. Sex-typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 1016–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. P. Manual for the Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Anderson, P. Sex role and attitudinal correlates of desired family size. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1974, 4, 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R., & Coombs, L. Economic considerations in family growth decisions. Population Studies, 1966, 20, 197–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried, M. R., & Kent, R. N. Traditional vs. behavioral personality assessment: A comparison of methodological and theoretical assumptions. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 77, 421–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hass, P. H. Maternal role incompatibility and fertility in urban Latin America. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28(2), 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, J. C. Number of children expected in relation to nonfamilial activities of the wife. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1959, 37, 277–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. The psychological foundation of masculinity and femininity: Their antecedents and correlates. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelpton, P. K., Campbell, A. A., & Patterson, J. E. Fertility and family planning in the United States. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Falbo, T., Graham, J.S. & Gryskiewicz, S.S. Sex roles and fertility in college women. Sex Roles 4, 845–851 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287704

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287704

Keywords

Navigation