Summary
The efficacy of several formulations of activated charcoal (AC) was compared by measuring the intestinal absorption of a solution of 1 g paracetamol administered 2 min before administration of 5 g AC as suspension (200 ml), tablets (40 of 125 mg) or capsules (25 of 200 mg). The suspension medium without AC was used as the control treatment. Based on the results of a pilot experiment, an 8 subject panel was used in a two 4×4 Latin square design.
All treatments with AC resulted in a statistically significant decrease in paracetamol absorption compared to the control treatment. The suspension was considerably and significantly more effective than the tablets or capsules. Treatment with tablets was slightly but significantly more effective than capsules. The intake of large numbers of tablets and capsules was difficult.
In the hospital AC suspensions are available. For first aid elsewhere, at home, at the working place or in the general practitioner's surgery a preservable and easily redispersible AC formulation would be preferable to the present solid forms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hayden JW, Comstock EG (1975) Use of activated charcoal in acute poisoning. Clin Toxicol 8: 515–533
Neuvonen PJ (1982) Clinical pharmacokinetics of oral activated charcoal in acute intoxications. Clin Pharmacokinet 7: 465–489
Cooney DO (1980) Activated Charcoal. Dekker, New York
Tsuchiya T, Levy G (1972) Drug adsorption efficacy of commercial activated charcoal tablets in vitro and in man. J Pharm Sci 62: 624–625
Otto U, Stenberg B (1973) Drug adsorption properties of different activated charcoal dosage forms in vitro and in man. Svensk Farm Tidskr 77: 613–615
Wijngaarden JR, Smith LHS (1982) Cecil's Textbook of medicine. Saunders, Philadelphia
Tebbet IR, Omile CI, Danesh B (1985) Determination of paracetamol, salicylic acid and acetyl salicylic acid in serum by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 329: 196–198
Pearson ES, Hartley HO (1951) Charts of the power function for analysis of variance tests derived from the non-central F-distribution. Biometrica 38: 112–130
Slob W (1987) Strategies in applying statistics in ecological research. Free University Press, Amsterdam 112pp Thesis
Levy G, Gwilt PR (1972) Activated charcoal for acute acetaminophen intoxications. JAMA 219: 621
Dordoni B, Wilson RA, Thompson RPH, Williams R (1973) Reduction of absorption of paracetamol by activated charcoal and cholestyramine: a possible therapeutic measure. Br Med J 3: 86–87
Bainbridge CA, Kelly EL, Walking WD (1977) In vitro adsorption of acetaminophen onto activated charcoal. J Pharm Sci 66: 480–483
Mayersohn M, Perrier D, Picchioni AL (1977) Evaluation of a charcoal sorbitol mixture as an antidote for oral aspirin overdose. Clin Toxicol 11: 561–567
Cooney DO (1982) Effect of type and amount of carboxymethyl-cellulose on in vitro salicylate adsorption by activated charcoal. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 19: 367–376
Nakano NI, Shimamori Y, Umehashi M, Nakano M (1984) Preparation and drug absorption characteristics of activated carbon beads suitable for oral administration. Chem Pharm Bull 32: 699–707
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The study was carried out at the request of the Dutch Committee for Evaluation of Medicines, Rijswijk, the Netherlands.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Remmert, H.P., Olling, M., Slob, W. et al. Comparative antidotal efficacy of activated charcoal tablets, capsules and suspension in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 39, 501–505 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00280944
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00280944