Skip to main content
Log in

Regeneration of plants from mesophyll protoplasts of the wild crucifer Eruca sativa Lam.

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protoplasts isolated from mesophyll cells of Eruca sativa Lam., cultured on suitable medium, underwent sustained cell divisions to form calli. The plating efficiency was found to be 0.4%. The protoplast-derived calli subsequently produced plantlets through organogenesis (15.71%) and somatic embryogenesis (11.25%). Regenerated plants exhibited normal appearance. These results indicate potential to introgress desirable traits from this wild crucifer into important oilseed and cole Brassicas by protoplast fusion and hybrid recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

B5:

Gamborg et al., 1968

K3:

Kao and Michayluk, 1974

MS:

Murashige and Skoog, 1962

BAP:

6-benzylaminopurine

2,4-D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

NAA:

1-naphthalene acetic acid

GA3 :

Gibberellic acid

References

  • Barsby TL, Yarrow SA, Shepard JF (1986) Plant Cell Reports 5: 101–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsby TL, Chuong PV, Yarrow SA, Wu S-C, Coumans M, Kemble RJ, Powell AD, Beversdorf WD, Pauls KP (1987) Theor Appl Genet 73: 809–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee G, Sikdar SR, Das S, Sen SK (1985) Plant Cell Reports 4: 245–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu Y-Y, Jia S-R, Lin Y (1985) Theor Appl Genet 71: 495–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Exp Cell Res 50: 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glimelius K (1984) Physiol Plant 61: 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glimelius K, Djupsjobacka M, Fellner-Feldegg F (1986) Plant Science 45: 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN, Michayluk MR (1974) Planta 115: 355–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ (1976) Planta 128: 213–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Kohlenbach HW (1982) Plant Cell Reports 1: 209–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizushima U (1950) Tohoku J Agr Res 1: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizushima U (1972) Kagaku to Seibutsu 10: 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menczel L, Morgan A, Brown S, Maliga P (1987) Plant Cell Reports 6: 98–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagata T, Takebe I (1970) Planta 92: 301–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier G, Primard C, Vedel F, Chetrit P, Remy R, Rousselle, Renard M (1983) Mol Gen Genet 191: 244–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg G, Koop H-U, Lichter R, Schweiger HG (1986) Physiol Plant 66: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg E, Glimelius K (1986) Plant Science 43: 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi T, Kameya T (1986) Jpn J Breed 36(2): 185–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terada R, Yamashita Y, Nishibayashi S, Shimamoto K (1987) Theor Appl Genet 73: 379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teriyama K, Kameya T, Hinata K (1987) Planta 170: 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • U N, Nagamatsu T, Mizushima U (1937) Cytologia, Fujii Jub. Vol. 437–441.

  • Yarrow SA, Wu S-C, Barsby TL, Kemble RJ, Shepard JF (1986) Plant Cell Reports 5: 415–418.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G.C. Phillips

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sikdar, S.R., Chatterjee, G., Das, S. et al. Regeneration of plants from mesophyll protoplasts of the wild crucifer Eruca sativa Lam.. Plant Cell Reports 6, 486–489 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00272790

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00272790

Keywords

Navigation