Skip to main content
Log in

Patch grafting the renal pelvis and ureteropelvic junction

A comparative study in pigs using lyophilized dura mater and free peritoneum

  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Lyophilized dura mater (Lyodura) and autogenous free peritoneum were compared in the replacement of the partially resected renal pelvis and ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) in the pig. The Lyodura and peritoneum grafts were both progressively resorbed, and replaced by fibroblasts which formed a mature scar lined by transitional epithelium, but without smooth muscle regeneration. Lyodura was found to be superior to free peritoneum with a longer time before resorption of the graft, less intense inflammatory reaction, absence of metaplastic bone formation, less risk of urine leak and greater ease of surgical manipulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acquaviva A, Turrisi A and Cannizzaro MA (1980) Part replacement of the ureter wiyh lyophilized dura mater. Experimental research. Chir Ital 32:1152

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis D (1943) Intubated ureterotomy. A new operaton for ureteral and ureteropelvic stricture. Surg Gyn Obstet 76:513

    Google Scholar 

  3. Faber P, Beef L, Heidenreich J (1978) Treatment of stress incontinence in women with the lyodura sling. Urol Int 33:117

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hinman F Jr (1981) Ureteral reconstitution. In: Bergman H (ed) The ureter, chapt 8, 2nd edn. Harper & Rowe, New York, pp 179–185

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hohenfellner R (1965) Experimentelle und klinische Untersuchungen über die Peritoenallappenplastik der Harnblase. Ann Univ Sarav [Med] 12:108

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hutschenreiter R, Rumpelt HJ, Klippel KF, Hohenfellner R (1978) The free peritoneal transplant as a substitute for the urinary bladder wall. Invest Urol 15:375

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ianetti G, D'Arco F (1977) The use of lyphilized dura in reconstruction of the orbital floor. J Maxillefac Surg 5:58

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kelami A (1971) Lyophilized human dura as a bladder wall substitute: experimental and clinical results. J Urol 105:518

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kelami A (1975) Duraplasty of the bladder — results after two to six years. Eur Urol 1:178

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kelami A, Ludtke-Handjery A, Korb G, Rolle J, Schnell J, Dangiel KH (1970) Alloplastic replacement of the urinary bladder wall with lyophilized human dura. Eur Surg Res 2:195

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lenzi R, Di Cello V, Ponchietti R, Barbagli G (1981) Rupture of the bulb of the urethra: repair effectuated using a patch of human dura mater. J Urol 125:506

    Google Scholar 

  12. MacFarlane MR, Symon L (1979) Lyophilized dura mater: experimental implantation and extended clinical neurosurgical use. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 42:854

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson IE (1977) Repair of ureteropelvic junction and ureteral injury with renal capsule flaps. Urol Clin North Am 4: 45

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thompson IE, Kovacsi L, Proterfield J (1963) Reconstruction of the ureteropelvic junction with pedicle grafts of renal capsule. J Urol 89:573

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thüroff JW, Hutschenreiter G, Frohnberg D, Hohenfellner R (1981) Transplantation of a free peritoneal patch in surgery of the renal pelvis and ureter. Eur Urol 7:304

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by the University Urological Research Foundation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Royce, P.L., Zimmern, P.E. & deKernion, J.B. Patch grafting the renal pelvis and ureteropelvic junction. Urol. Res. 16, 37–41 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00264626

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00264626

Key words

Navigation