Abstract
The history of geography needs to be more closely connected with recent revisionist accounts of the history of science. After a brief review of some of the newer historiographic insights that have lately been applied to writings on geography's history, this paper sets out some additional principles that historians of the subject might profitably engage. Chief among these are the consequences of taking seriously the “situatedness” and “contingency” of geographical knowledge and practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buttimer, A.: Musing on Helicon: Root metaphors and geography. Geografiska Annaler 64B, 89–96 (1982)
Golinski, J.: The theory of practice and the practice of theory: Sociological approaches in the history of science. Isis 81, 492–505 (1990)
Harvey, D.: On the history and present condition of geography: An historical materialist manifesto. Professional Geographer 36, 1–10 (1984)
Hull, D.L.: Science as a Process. An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1988.
Livingstone, D.N.; Harrison, R.T.: Understanding in geography: Structuring the subjective. In: Herbert, D.T.; Johnston, R.J. (eds.), Geography and the Urban Environment: Progress in Research and Applications, Vol. 5, pp. 1–39. John Wiley, Chichester 1982.
Mair, A.: Thomas Kuhn and understanding geography. Progress in Human Geography 10, 345–369 (1986)
Shapin, S.; Schaffer, S.: Leviathan and the Air-pump. Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 1985.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Livingstone, D.N. In defence of situated messiness: Geographical knowledge and the history of science. GeoJournal 26, 228–229 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00241227
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00241227