Abstract
Scanning electron microscopy has been used to investigate the morphological changes occurring during the development of alfalfa somatic embryos. Embryos were initiated from callus, transferred to suspension culture and matured on solid agar medium. This developmental pattern was compared to that of zygotic embryos developing in ovulo. Somatic embryos begin as distinct pro-embryos within the callus tissue pieces placed in suspension culture. They become globular and heart-shaped while on solid agar medium and then undergo cotyledon elongation and maturation. Somatic embryos develop comparatively slower at early stages of development and faster at the later stages than zygotic embryos. They lack a well-defined suspensor and have a very rough, poorly-differentiated epidermis, the first layer of which is lost after pro-embryo formation. The cotyledons of somatic embryos are multiple and poorlydeveloped; there appears to be a correlation between the amount of surface roughness of the developing embryo and the extent to which polycotyledony occurs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anandarajah K, McKersie BD (1990a) Plant Sci 71 261–266
Anandarajah K, McKersie BD (1990b) Plant Cell Report 9 451–455
Ammirato PV (1983) In: Handbook of Plant Cell Culture New York Macmillan Publishing Co v 1 p 82–123
Brown MJ, Greenwood JS (1990) Can J Bot 68 2353–2360
Conger BV, Hanning GE, Gray DJ, McDaniel JK (1983) Science 221 850–851
Cooper DC (1935) J Agric Res 51 471–477
Cooper DC, Brink RA, Albrecht HR (1937) Am J Bot 24 203–213
Cui D, Myers JR, Collins GB, Lazzeri PA (1988) Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 15 33–45
Fujii JAA, Slade D, Olsen R, Ruzin SB, Redenbaugh K (1990) Plant Sci 72 93–100
Gray DJ, Conger BV, Songstad DD (1987) In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 23 29–33
Gray DJ, Conger BV, Hanning GE (1984) Protoplasma 122 196–202
Halperin W (1966) Am J Bot 53 443–453
Johnson LB, Stuteville DL, Higgins PK, Skinner DZ (1981) Plant Sci Lett 20 297–304
Kao KN, Michayluk MR (1980) Z Pflanzenphysiol 96 135–141
Krochko JE, Bewley JD (1988) Electrophoresis 9:751–763
Krochko JE, Pramanik SK, Bewley JD (1991) Plant Physiol., in press
Martin JN (1914) Bot Gaz 58 154–167
Reeves RG (1930a) Am J Bot 17 29–40
Reeves RG (1930b) Am J Bot 17 239–246
Reinert J (1958) Naturwiss 45 344–345
Reinert J (1959) Planta 58 318–333
Sangduen N, Kreitner GL, Sorensen EL (1983a) Can J Bot 61 837–849
Sangduen N, Kreitner GL, Sorensen EL (1983b) Can J Bot 61 1241–1257
Santos AVPD, Machado RD (1989) Ann Bot 64 293–296
Santos AVPD, Outka DE, Cocking EC, Davey MR (1980) Z Pflanzen physiol 99 261–270
Santos AVPD, Cutter EG, Davey MR (1983) Protoplasma 117 107–115
Saunders JW, Bingham ET (1972) Crop Sci 12 804–808
Senaratna T, McKersie BD, Bowley SR (1990) Plant Sci 65 253–259
Senaratna T, McKersie BD, Bowley SR (1989) In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 26 85–90
Steeves TA, Sussex IM (1989) Patterns in plant development. Cambridge University Press
Steward FC, Mapes MO, Mears K (1958) Am J Bot 45 705–708
Stuart DA, Nelsen J, Strickland JG, Nichol JW (1985) In: Forestry and Agriculture Edited. Henke R Plenum Publishing Co New York pp 59–73
Xu N, Coulter KM, Krochko JE, Bewley JD (1991) Seed Sci Res. 1 117–125
Xu N, Coulter KM, Bewley JD (1990) Planta 182 382–390
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by F. Constabel
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, N., Bewley, J.D. Contrasting pattern of somatic and zygotic embryo development in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) as revealed by scanning electron microscopy. Plant Cell Reports 11, 279–284 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235082
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235082