Skip to main content
Log in

A space-variant differential operator for visual sensitivity

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

All the elements of a Fourier analysis can be derived from the experiments of Graham and Robson on contrast sensitivity. Once their experiment is posed as an eigenvalue problem, a complete orthonormal set of eigenfunctions results from solving the associated differential equation. Neither sine and cosine nor Gabor functions result. Instead, the Hermite functions arise as the eigenfunctions of a space-variant differential operator used to model the contrast sensitivity of human observers. These functions, up to a constant, are their own Fourier transforms, and in principle can be used to exactly represent the Fourier transform of naturally occuring visual images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cornsweet TN (1970) Visual perception. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentini A, Mazzantini L (1966) Neural inhibition in the human fovea: a study of interactions between two line stimuli. Atti Fond G Ronchi 21:738–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabor D (1946) Theory of communications. JIEE 93:429–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham NVS (1989) Visual pattern analyzers. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham N, Robson JG, Nachmais J (1978) Grating summation in fovea and periphery. Vision Res 18:815–825

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermite C (1864) Sur un nouveau developpement en serie des fonctions. Comptes Rendus 58:93–100, 266–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys H, Jeffreys B (1956) Methods of mathematical physics, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DH (1970) Effect of sharp edges on the visibility of sinusoidal gratings. J Opt Soc Am 60:98–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink JJ (1988) Operational significance of receptive field assemblies. Biol Cybern 58:163–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink JJ, Richards W (1988) Two-dimensional curvature operators. J Opt Soc Am 5A:1136–1141

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink JJ, van Doom AJ (1982) Invariant features of contrast detection: an explanation in terms of self-similar detector arrays. J Opt Soc Am 72:83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink JJ, van Doom AJ (1987) Representation of local geometry in the visual system. Biol Cybern 55:367–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr D (1981) Vision. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr D, Hildreth E (1980) Theory of edge detection. Proc R Soc (London) B207:187–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens J-B (1990) Deblurring digital images by means of polynomial transforms. Comp Vis Graph Image Process 50:157–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson JR (1982) Frequency domain visual processing. In: Braddick OJ, Sleigh AC (eds) Physical and biological processing of images. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Young RA (1987) The Gaussian derivative model for spatial vision: I. Retinal mechanisms. Spat Vision 2:273–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker SW, Hummel RA (1986) Receptive fields and the representation of visual information. Hum Neurobiol 5:121–128

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stewart, A.L., Pinkham, R. A space-variant differential operator for visual sensitivity. Biol. Cybern. 64, 373–379 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224704

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224704

Keywords

Navigation