Skip to main content
Log in

The voting behavior of bureaucrats: Some empirical evidence

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary and conclusions

This paper has examined the voting behavior of bureaucrats and the consequences for elections. The economic theory of the rational voter predicts that bureaucrats would have more to gain by voting than the general public. The cost of voting is lower for public employees than for those who work in the private sector. As a consequence, theory predicts that bureaucrats would participate in elections at a greater rate than other individuals. As a test of the validity of the economic theory of voting, an empirical analysis of national elections from 1964 to 1978 was presented. The evidence is drawn from household survey data published by the U.S. Bureau of the Census. The data permit a direct observation of voting participation rates of public and private employees. The empirical results indicate that bureaucrats consistently participate in elections at significantly greater rates than non-bureaucrats. As the public sector expands and voter participation rates remain low, bureaucrats will exert disproportionate influence on election outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, B., and Settle, R. (1976). The determinants of voter participation: A more general model. Public Choice 27(Fall): 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y., and Silberberg, E. (1973). Is the act of voting rational? Public Choice 16(Fall): 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, T.E., Busch, W.C., and Spann, (1977). The effects on public spending of the divisibility of public outputs in consumption, bureaucratic power, and the size of the tax-sharing group. In T.E. Borcherding (Ed.), Budgets and bureaucrats. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, W., C., and Denzau, A. T. (1977). The voting behavior of bureaucrats and public sector growth. In T. E. Borcherding (Ed.), Budgets and bureaucrats. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1975). An economist's protest, 2nd ed. Glen Ridge, NJ: Horton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentz, B. F. (1981). Political and economic determinants of county government pay. Public Choice 36(Spring): 253–271.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. C. (1933). The municipal electorate: A case study. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly (December).

  • Payne, J. L. (1968). Patterns of conflict in Colombia. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollison, R.D., and Willett, T.D. (1973). Some simple economics of voting and not voting Public Choice 16(Fall): 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors gratefully acknowledge research support provided by the Sarah Scaife Foundation and the Earhart Foundation. The authors also appreciate the contributions of Mr. Steve Gillespie. The usual caveats apply.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennett, J.T., Orzechowski, W.P. The voting behavior of bureaucrats: Some empirical evidence. Public Choice 41, 271–283 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210361

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210361

Keywords

Navigation