Abstract
Background:
Defecography is commonly used in investigation of pelvic floor and anorectal dysfunction, and incorporates measurement of pelvic floor movement during various maneuvers. These measurements are usually referenced to bony landmarks, particularly the ischial tuberosities. These bony landmarks may be difficult to visualize; theoretically, the use of digital subtraction in filming defecography studies should eliminate the need to pinpoint bony position.
Methods:
We filmed 25 defecogram studies in both nonsubtracted and subtracted formats, and interpreted each study blindly, subsequently comparing diagnoses and measurements.
Results:
Subtraction was of limited benefit in only one case, was impossible in one case, added no useful information in 18 cases, and hindered visualization of abnormalities in five cases.
Conclusions:
Because of the multiple overlapping densities and the inability to restrict patient movement, digital subtraction is unhelpful in defecography.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shorvon PJ, Stevenson GW. Defaecography: setting up a service. Br J Hosp Med 1989;41:460–466
Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 1989;30:1737–1749
Archer BD, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Contrast medium gel for marking vaginal position during defecography. Radiology 1992;182:278–279
Bender P, Stevenson GW, Shorvon P. Defecography commode. Radiology 1988;166:891–892
Karasick S, Karasick D, Karasick SR. Functional disorders of the anus and rectum: findings on defecography. AJR 1993;160:777–782
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brady, A.P., Somers, S., Hough, D. et al. Digital subtraction in defecography. Abdom Imaging 20, 245–247 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00200406
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00200406