Abstract
Measurements of reattachment length of a separated flow behind a backward-facing step for a range of Reynolds numbers (8000 < Re H < 40,000) and initial boundary-layer thickness (0 < δ/H < 2) were performed with the purpose of explaining the scatter in existing (high quality) data sets and to understand the effect of the initial shear-layer structure on the reattachment zone. The reattachment length for the case of laminar boundary layers upstream of the step were 30% smaller than when the boundary layer upstream of the step was turbulent. Measured values of the mean wall shear stress in the reattachment zone were also measurably affected by the upstream boundary-layer state. The (rms) levels of fluctuating wall stress were not sensitive to boundary-layer state, but rather to δ/H, as was the case for the pressure profiles in part 1 (Adams and Johnston 1988).
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- C p* :
-
normalized pressure, (C p − C p, min)/(1 − C p, min)
- C f :
-
skin friction coefficient, τ/0.5 ρ U 2ref
- C′ f :
-
level (rms) of fluctuation part of skin-friction coefficient
- ER :
-
duct expansion ratio; outlet to inlet width
- H :
-
step height
- Re d :
-
Reynolds number based on diameter
- Re θ :
-
Reynolds number based on inlet boundary-layer momentum thickness, and U ref
- Re H :
-
Reynolds number based on H and U ref
- x r :
-
distance to reattachment
- X * :
-
normalized distance, (x − x r)/x r (note: different from x/x r in part 1)
- δ/H :
-
ratio of inlet boundary-layer thickness to step height
- gq 0 :
-
momentum thickness upstream of step
References
Acrivos, A.; Snowdon, D. D.; Gvoe, A. S.; Peterson, E. E. 1965: Steady separated flow past a circular cylinder at high Reynolds anumber. J. Fluid Mech. 21, 737–760
Adams, E. W.; Johnston, J. P.; Eaton, J. K. 1984: Experiments on the structure of reattaching flow. Rept. MD-43, Thermosciences Div.; Mech. Eng. Dept.; Stanford University/CA, USA
Adams, E. W.; Johnston, J. P. 1988: Effects of the separating shear layer on the reattachment flow structure, part 1: Pressure and turbulence Quantities. Exp. Fluids 6, 400–408
Armaly, B. F.; Durst, F.; Schoenung, B. 1980: Measurements and predictions of flow downstream of a two-dimensional single backward-facing step. Rept. SFB 80/ET/172, Univ. Karlsruhe, FRG
Back, L. H.; Roshke, E. J. 1972: Shear-layer flow regimes and wave instabilities and reattachment lengths downstream of an abrupt circular channel expansion. J. Appl. Mech. 94, 677–781
Bradshaw, P. 1966: The effect of initial conditions on the development of a free shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 225–236
Brederode, V. de, Bradshaw, P. 1972: Three dimensional flow in normally two dimensional separation bubbles. I.C. Aero rep. 72–19, Imperial College, London/UK
Castro, I. P. 1981: Measurements in shear layer separating from surface-mounted bluff bodies. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 7, 253–272
Castro, I. P.; Facrell, J. E. 1978: A note two-dimensional fence flows with emphasis on wall constraint. J. Ind. Aerodyn. 3, 1–20
Chapman, D. R.; Kuehn, D. M.; Larson, H. K. 1958: Investigation of separated flows with emphasis on the effect of transition. NACA Rep. 1256
Driver, D. M.; Seegmiller, H. L. 1985: Features of a reattaching turbulent shear layer in divergent channel flow. AIAA J. 23, 163–171
Durst, F.; Tropea, C. 1981: Turbulent backward-facing step flows in two-dimensional ducts and channels. Proc. Third Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Davis/CA, USA
Eaton, J. K.; Jeans, A. H.; Ashjee, J.; Johnston, J. P. 1979: A wall-flow direction probe for use in separating and reattaching flow. Fluids Eng. 101, 364–366
Eaton, J. K.; Johnston, J. P. 1980: Turbulent flow reattachment: an experimental study of the flow and structure behind a backwardfacing step. Rept. MD-39, Dept. of Mech. Eng.; Stanford University, Stanford/CA, USA
Eaton, J. K.; Johnston, J. P. 1981: A review of research on subsonic turbulent flow reattachment. AIAA J. 19, 1093–1100
Pronchick, S. W.; Kline, S. J. 1983: An experimental investigation of the structure of a turbulent reattaching flow behind a backward facing step. Rep. MD-32, Mech. Eng. Dept.; Stanford University/CA, USA
Restivo, A.; Whitelaw, J. H. 1979: Instabilities in sudden-expansion flows of relevance to room ventilation. 2nd Turbulent Shear Flows Conference, London/UK, September, pp. 16.24–16.29
Roshko, A.; Lau, J. C. 1965: Some observations in transition and reattachment of a free shear layer in Incompressible flow. Proc. Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute (Charwat, A. F.; ed.), pp. 157–167. Stanford/CA: Stanford Univ. Press
Schmitt, F. 1987: Untersuchung der turbulenten Stufenströmung bei hohen Reynoldszahlen. VDI-Ber. Reihe 7, Nr. 117. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag
Tropea, C. D. 1982: Die turbulente Stufenströmung in Flachkanälen und offenen Gerinnen. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Karlsruhe, FRG, Rept. SFB 80/E-21
Westphal, R. V.; Eaton, J. K.; Johnston, J. P. 1981: A new probe for measurement of velocity and wall shear stress in unsteady reversing flow. J. Fluids Eng. 103, 478
Westphal, R. V.; Johnston, J. P.; Eaton, J. K. 1984: Experimental study of flow reattachment in a single-sided sudden expansion. NASA CR-3765
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adams, E.W., Johnston, J.P. Effects of the separating shear layer on the reattachment flow structure part 2: Reattachment length and wall shear stress. Experiments in Fluids 6, 493–499 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196511
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196511