Skip to main content
Log in

Transpiration efficiency in crops of semi-dwarf and standard-height sunflower

  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper compares transpiration efficiency (TEc = shoot biomass corrected by seed oil-synthesis cost/ transpiration per unit vapour pressure deficit) of standard-height and semi-dwarf sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) crops. Three irrigation regimes that differed in timing and amount of irrigation were applied. Transpiration was calculated as the difference between evapotranspiration (assessed by hydrological balance) and soil evaporation (measured using evaporimeters). Irrigation treatments and irrigation × cultivar interaction did not affect TEc. Across irrigation regimes, seasonal TEc was 4.70 and 3.64 g m-2 mm-1 kPa (P < 0.003) for the standard-height and semi-dwarf crops, respectively. Seasonal differences in TEc arose from differences during the post-anthesis period. The lower post-anthesis TEc of the semi-dwarf cultivar was related to a smaller radiation-use efficiency. Possible causes for the differences in post-anthesis radiation-use efficiency are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson WK (1975) Maturation of sunflower. Aust J Exp Agric Animal Husb 15: 833

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson WK, Smith RCG, Mc William JR (1978) A systems approach to the adaptation of sunflower to new environments. I. Phenology and development. Field Crops Res 1: 141

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin RB (1989) Genetic variation in photosynthesis. J Agric Sci 112: 287

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchet R, Gelfi N, Merrien A (1978) Role de la structure des feuilles dans la consommation d'eau du tournesol. CETIOM, Inf Tech No. 63:12

  • Blum A, Mayer J, Golan G (1988) The effect of grain number per ear (sink size) on source activity and its water-relations in wheat. J Exp Bot 39: 106

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs LJ, Shantz HL (1914) Relative water requirements of plants. J Agric Res 3: 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor DJ, Jones TR, Palta JA (1985) Response of sunflower to strategies of irrigation. I. Growth, yield and the efficiency of water-use. Field Crops Res 10: 15

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wit CT (1958) Transpiration and crop yields. Versl Lbouwk Onderz Agric Res Rep no 663 Pudoc, Wageningen

  • Finnney DJ (1989) Was this in your statistics text book? VI Regression and covariance. Exp Agric 25: 291

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer RA, Bidinger F, Syme JR, Wall PC (1981) Leaf photosynthesis, leaf permeability, crop growth, and yield of short spring wheat genotypes under irrigation. Crop Sci 21: 367

    Google Scholar 

  • Green DG, Read DWL (1983) Water use efficiency of corn, sunflower, and wheat with limiting soil moisture. Can J Plant Sci 63: 747

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall AJ, Connor DJ, Whitfield DM (1989) Contribution of preanthesis assimilates to grain-filling in irrigated and water-stressed sunflower crops. I. Estimates using labelled carbon. Field Crops Res 20: 95

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattendorf MJ, Redelfs MS, Amos B, Stone LR, Gwin RE Jr (1988) Comparative water use characteristics of six row crops. Agron J 80: 80

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RB, Harris D, Williams JH, Nageswara Rao RC (1988) The physiological basis for yield differences between four genotypes of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in response to drought. II. Solar radiation interception and leaf movement. Exp Agric 24: 203

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison IL, Gifford RM (1984) Plant growth and water use with limited water supply in high CO2 concentrations. II. Plant dry weight, partitioning and water use efficiency. Aust J Plant Physiol 11: 375

    Google Scholar 

  • Neales TF, Incoll LD (1968) The control of leaf photosynthesis rate by the level of assimilate concentration in the leaf: a review of the hypothesis. Bot Rev 34: 107

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter JR, Breen PJ (1980) Maintenance of high photosynthetic rates during the accumulation of leaf starch in sunflower and soybean. Plant Physiol 66: 528

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson HM, Gifford RM, Bremner PM (1974) CO2 exchange in relation to sink-demand in wheat. Planta 132: 19

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson HM, Begg JE, Woodward RG (1977) The effect of atmospheric humidity on photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of leaves of several plant species. Planta 134: 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson HM (1979) Vertical wilting and photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of sunflower leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol 6: 109

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson HM, Constable GA (1980) Carbon production of sunflower cultivars in field and controlled environments. I. Photosynthesis and transpiration of leaves, stems and heads. Aust J Plant Physiol 7: 555

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadras VO (1990) Transpiration, transpiration efficiency and harvest index in sunflower. PhD Thesis, The University of Melbourne

  • Sadras VO, Connor DJ (1991) Physiological basis of the response of harvest index to the fraction of water trranspired after anthesis. A simple model to estimate harvest index for determinate species. Field Crops Res (in press)

  • Sadras VO, Whitfield DM, Connor DJ (1991) Regulation of evapotranspiration and its partitioning between transpiration and soil evaporation by sunflower crops. A comparison between hybrids of different stature. Field Crops Res (in press)

  • Sadras VO, Connor DJ, Whitfield DM (1990) Yield and yield components of sunflower hybrids of different stature under water stress as affected by source-sink relationships between stems and reproductive structures. Proceedings Australian Sunflower Association 8th Workshop, Kooralbyn, pp 98–102

  • Shantz HL, Piemeisel LN (1927) The water requirement of plants at Akron, Colo. J Agric Res 34: 1093

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR, Tanner CB, Bennet JM (1984) Water-use efficiency in crop production. Biol Sci 34: 36

    Google Scholar 

  • Skene JKM, Poutsma TJ (1962) Soils and land use in part of the Goulburn Valley. Victoria Department of Agriculture, Victoria Tech Bull No 14, Government Printer, Melbourne, 48 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner CB (1981) Transpiration efficiency of potato. Agron J 73: 59

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner CB, Sinclair TR (1983) Efficient water use in crop production: Research or re-search? In: Taylor HM, Jordan WR, Sinclair TR (eds) Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. ASA, CSSA, SCSA, pp 1–27

  • Trápani N, Sadras VO, Vilella F, Hall AJ (1988) A physiological analysis of the growth and yield of two sunflower cultivars. Proc 12th Int Sunflower Conf, Novi Sad, pp 63–68

  • Virgona JM, Hubick KT, Rawson HM, Farquhar GD, Downes RW (1990) Genotypic variation in transpiration efficiency, carbon isotope discrimination and carbon allocation during early growth in sunflower. Aust J Plant Physiol 17: 207

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker GK (1983) Measurement of evaporation from soil beneath crop canopies. Can J Soil Sci 63: 137

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren Wilson J (1967) Ecological data on dry matter production by plants and plant communities. In: Bradley EF, Denmead DT (eds) The collection and processing of field data. Willey-InterScience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaffaroni EA, Schneiter AA (1989) Water-use efficiency and light interception of semidwarf and standard-height sunflower hybrids grown in different row arrangements. Agron J 81: 831

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sadras, V.O., Whitfield, D.M. & Connor, D.J. Transpiration efficiency in crops of semi-dwarf and standard-height sunflower. Irrig Sci 12, 87–91 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190015

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190015

Keywords

Navigation