Skip to main content
Log in

Tissue adhesives inhibit experimental new bone formation

  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effect of the cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive Histoacryl on new bone formation was studied in rats. Experimental heterotopic new bone formation was induced by implanting pieces of demineralized allogeneic bone matrix (DABM) in the abdominal wall of 10 growing Sprague-Dawley rats. This produces cartilage formation within and around the implants after 10 days, followed by enchondral ossification and the formation of an ossicle with remodelling bone and bone marrow after three weeks. Prior to implantation, the DABM-implants were treated with increasing amounts of the tissue adhesive n-Butyl-2-cyanoacrylate-monomer (Histoacryl). New bone formation was quantified at three weeks by assay of the ash content of the implants as a measure of net bone formation, by 45calcium uptake prior to sacrifice, and by histology. Treatment of DABM with the cyanoacrylate caused an intense inflammatory process with a foreign body reaction, and abolished bone induction and new bone formation. Tissue adhesives should be used with caution in fracture surgery since they inhibit new bone formation, cause a foreign body reaction, and may impede fracture healing.

Résumé

L'effet d'un tissu adhésif de cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl) sur la néoformation osseuse a été étudié chez le rat. Une néoformation osseuse hétérotopique a été induite par implantation de fragments de matrice osseuse allogène déminéralisée (MOAD) dans la paroi abdominale de 10 rats Sprague-Dowley en période de croissance. Cette implantation détermine en dix jours l'apparition de cartilage à l'intérieur et à la périphérie des implants, suivie d'une ossification enchondrale et de la formation d'os et de moelle osseuse à la fin de la troisième semaine. Avant d'être mis en place, les implants de MOAD ont été préparés par des quantités croissantes de n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate monomère (Histoacryl). La formation d'os nouveau a été mesurée, à la troisième semaine, par l'analyse de la cendre des implants, par l'activité, avant sacrifice, du calcium 45 et par l'histologie. La préparation des implants de MOAD par le cyanoacrylate entraîne une réaction inflammatoire intense et arrête l'induction et la formation d'os nouveau. On peut en conclure que les tissue adhésifs doivent être utilisés avec précaution en chirurgie traumatologique car ils inhibent la néoformation osseuse, déterminent une réaction à corps étranger et peuvent retarder la consolidation des fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauer HCF, Nilsson OS, Törnkvist H (1984) Formation and resorption of bone induced by demineralized bone matrix implants in rats. Clin Orthop 191: 139–143

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer HCF, Törnkvist H, Nilsson OS (1986) Effects of bisphosphonates on the incorporation of Calcium-45 and 3H-proline in orthotopic and in demineralized matrix induced bone in rats. Bone 7: 129–135

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhaskar SN, Frisch J (1968) Use of cyanoacrylate adhesives in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 77: 831–837

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bonnette GH (1969) Experimental fractures of the mandible. J Oral Surg 27: 568–571

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonutti PM, Weiker GG, Andrish JT (1988) Isobutyl cyanoacrylate as a soft tissue adhesive. Clin Orthop 1988; 229: 241–246

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron JL, Woodward SC, Pulaski EJ (1965) The degradation of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Surgery 58: 424–430

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chou SN (1977) Use of cyanoacrylate. J Neurosurg 46: 266

    Google Scholar 

  8. Corn RC, Corn O, Matsumoto T (1972) Osteosynthesis employing isobutyl-cyanoacrylate monomer. Int Surg 57: 483–487

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fox M, Rees RW, Lomas AH (1969) Effect of isobutyl cyanoacrylate on closure of partial nephrectomy and nephrectomy incisions. Br J Surg 56: 386

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geldmacher J (1980) Das kleine Fragment im Finger und Mittelhandbereich, Handchirurgie 12: 83–84

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harper MC, Ralston M (1983) Isobutyl 2-cyanoacrylate as an osseous adhesive in the repair of osteochondral fractures. J Biomed Mater Res 17: 167–177

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hunter KM (1976) Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives in osseous repair. Br J Oral Surg 14: 80–86

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lobene RR, Sharawy AM (1968) The response of alveolar bone to cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives. J Periodontol 39: 150–156

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nilsson OS, Urist MR, Dawson EG, Schmalzried TP, Finerman GAM (1986) Bone repair induced by bone morphogenetic protein in ulnar defects in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68: 635–642

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pani KC, Gladieux G, Brandes G (1968) The degradation of n-butyl alpha cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Surgery 63: 481–489

    Google Scholar 

  16. Törnkvist H, Bauer HCF, Nilsson OS (1985) Influence of indomethacin on experimental bone metabolism in rats. Clin Orthop 193: 264–270

    Google Scholar 

  17. Urist MR (1965) Bone formation by autoinduction. Science 150: 893–899

    Google Scholar 

  18. Urist MR, Hay PH, Dubuc F, Buring K (1969) Osteogenic competence. Clin Orthop 64: 194–220

    Google Scholar 

  19. Urist MR, DeLange RJ, Finerman GAM (1983) Bone cell differentiation and growth factors. Science 220: 680–686

    Google Scholar 

  20. Urist MR, Nilsson OS, Hudak R, Huo YK, Rasmussen JK, Hirota W, Lietze A (1985) Immunologic evidence of a bone morphogenetic protein in the milieu interieur. Ann Biol Clin 43: 755–766

    Google Scholar 

  21. Urist MR (1989) Bone morphogenetic protein, bone regeneration, heterotopic ossification and the bone — bone marrow consortium. Bone Mineral Res 6: 57–112

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weber SC, Chapman MW (1984) Adhesives in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop 191: 249–261

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wozney JM, Rosen V, Celeste AJ, Mitsock LM, Whitters MJ, Kriz RW, Hewick RM, Wang EA (1988) Novel regulators of bone formation: molecular clones and activities. Science 242: 1528–1534

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Reprint requests to: O. Nilsson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekelund, A., Nilsson, O.S. Tissue adhesives inhibit experimental new bone formation. International Orthopaedics 15, 331–334 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186872

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186872

Keywords

Navigation