Skip to main content
Log in

Foraging in groups of water striders (Gerris remigis): effects of variability in prey arrivals and handling times

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In many species, socially subordinate individuals frequently remain in a group despite their lower priority of access to food and mates. This is expected to occur when the net benefits of staying in the group exceed those of a solitary existence. Analogously, territorial foragers surrounded by conspecific competitors are faced with tradeoffs as to patch tenacity. In either case, spatio-temporal variability in resource availability directly affects behavioral patterns and payoffs, particularly of individuals with low priority of access to the resource. However, such individuals may take advantage of natural environmental fluctuations in resource supply in cases where dominants are preoccupied. This arises regularly if two resource items cannot be handled simultaneously and if a second item arrives before handling of the first has been completed. I advance a heuristic model that predicts that foraging or mating success of individuals with low priority of access to resources may increase both with higher variance in inter-arrival times of the resource (given the same mean) and with an increase in the average handling time of the resource. I tested both predictions with two associations of individually marked, naturally foraging water striders (Gerris remigis) in the field. In natural streams individual water striders tend to occupy consistent positions that they may defend, resulting in priority of access to prey items floating downstream for individuals further up front. I manipulated the variance in prey inter-arrival times given the same mean, and the prey handling times by offering larger prey. The outcome was in qualitative agreement with the predictions of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradbury JW (1977) Lek mating behavior in the hammer-headed bat. Z Tierpsychol 45:225–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanella PJ, Wolf LL (1974) Temporal leks as a mating system in a temperate zone dragonfly. Behaviour 51:49–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T (1981) Risk-sensitivity in foraging groups. Ecology 62:527–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1978) Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly: the resident always wins. Anim Behav 26:138–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittus WPJ (1977) The social regulation of population density and age-sex distribution in the toque monkey. Behaviour 63:281–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn DJ (1985) A test of the hypothesis of compensatory upstream disperal using a stream-dwelling water strider, Gerris remigis. Oecologia (Berlin) 66:147–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser DF, Cerri RD (1982) Experimental evaluation of predator-prey relationships in a patchy environment: consequences for habitat use patterns in minnows. Ecology 63:307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie RG, Caraco T (1987) Risk-sensitive foraging strategies of two spider populations. Ecology 68:887–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausfater G (1975) Dominance and reproduction in baboons. Contrib Primatol 7:1–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard RD (1978) The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs. Evolution 32:850–871

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBoef PJ (1974) Male-male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals. Am Zool 14:163–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee RF, Polhemus DT, Cheng L (1975) Lipids of the water strider Gerris remigis (Heteroptera: Gerridae): seasonal and developmental variations. Comp Biochem Physiol 51 B:451–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Lienert GA (1973) Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik. Anton Hain, Meisenheim am Glan

    Google Scholar 

  • Murton RK, Isaacson AJ, Westwood NJ (1966) The relationship between wood pigeons and their clover food supply and the mechanism of population control. J Appl Ecology 3:55–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1975) Ecological Diversity. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR, Caraco T (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer, Sunderland MA, pp 122–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Recer GM, Blanckenhorn WU, Newman JA, Tuttle EM, Withiam ML, Caraco T (1987) Temporal resource variability and the habitat-matching rule. Evol Ecol 1:363–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein D (1984) Resource acquisition and alternative mating strategies in water striders, Gerris remigis. Am Zool 24:345–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein D (1989) Sperm competition in the water strider Gerris remigis. Anim Behav 38:631–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Rypstra AL (1979) Foraging flocks of spiders — a study of aggregate behavior in Crytophora citricola in West Africa. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:291–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence JR, Wilcox RS (1986) The mating system of two hybridizing species of water striders: II Alternative tactics of males and females. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:87–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW (1988) Group foraging in colonial web-building spiders: evidence for risk-sensitivity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:265–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhijn JG van (1973) Behavioural dimorphism in male ruffs. Behaviour 47:153–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehrencamp SL (1983) A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies. Anim Behav 31:667–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonnegut K (1973) Breakfast of champions. Panther, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten PL (1983) Diet and dominance among female vervet monkeys. Am J Primatol 5:139–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox RS, Ruckdeschel T (1982) Food threshold territoriality in a water strider (Gerris remigis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:85–90

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blanckenhorn, W.U. Foraging in groups of water striders (Gerris remigis): effects of variability in prey arrivals and handling times. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28, 221–226 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172174

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172174

Keywords

Navigation