Skip to main content
Log in

Family structure influences mate choice in white-fronted bee-eaters

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

White-fronted bee-eaters live in patrilocal, extended family groups in which several pairs may breed simultaneously and in which helping behavior by nonbreeders is common. The composition of a male's family, and his social position within it, are major predictors of his expected reproductive success. For females, the dispersing sex, a decision to pair necessitates forfeiting any potential fitness benefits available through helping in her family, in favor of the potential benefits of breeding in the male's family. Using a set of equations that incorporate the social and non-social predictors of nesting success, we develop a payoff matrix for the expected fitness (current and future) of pairing with different categories of males. Predictions generated from this payoff matrix were supported by data: (1) Females that could help close kin (and thus garner large indirect benefits) tended to remain unpaired. (2) Males with social characteristics associated with low expected reproductive success were more often rejected as potential mates by females. (3) “High-quality” males, those with potential helpers of their own, were nearly always paired. Simulation analyses were used to investigate female pairing decisions in more detail, and to test various hypotheses about possible decision rules. We demonstrate that pairing females incorporate an assessment of the family structure of potential partners into their mate choice decisions. Such social characters represent an aspect of female choice that has been underappreciated. We suggest that social characters will prove to be important components of mate choice decisions in many species where kinship and dominance considerations influence the likelihood, or success, of breeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (1987) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives (Dahlem Life Sciences Workshop Report 39) Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JL (1987) Helping and communal breeding in birds. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST (1990) The white-fronted bee-eater: helping in a colonially nesting species. In: Stacey PB, Koenig WD (eds) Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 305–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST (1991) Evolution of cooperative breeding in birds and mammals. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 301–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Wrege PH (1988) The role of kinship in helping decisions among white-fronted bee-eaters. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:305–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Wrege PH (1989) A test of alternate hypotheses for helping behavior in white-fronted bee-eaters of Kenya. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:303–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Wrege PH (1991) Breeding biology of white-fronted bee-eaters at Nakuru: the influence of helpers on breeder fitness. J Anim Ecol 60:309–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Wrege PH (1992) Parent-offspring conflict and the recruitment of helpers among bee-eaters. Nature 356:331–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Wrege PH (1994) Gender, status and family fortunes in the white-fronted bee-eater. Nature 367:129–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday TR (1978) Sexual selection and mate choice. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 180–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt AH (1987) Dominance and fertility among female primates. J Zool 213:471–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington FH, Paquet PC, Ryon J, Fentress JC (1982) Monogamy in wolves: a review of the evidence. In: Harrington FH, Paquet PC (eds) Wolves of the world: perspectives of behavior, ecology, and conservation. Noyes, Park Ridge, New Jersey, pp 209–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Holekamp KE, Smale L (1991) Dominance acquisition during mammalian social development: the “inheritance” of maternal rank. Am Zool 31:306–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald DW, Moehlman PD (1982) Cooperation, altruism, and restraint in the reproduction of carnivores. In: Klopfer P, Bateson P (eds) Perspectives in ethology vol. 5. Plenum, New York, pp 433–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm JR, Marten K (1982) Natural selection and the communal rearing of pups in African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Rood JP (1983) The social system of the dwarf mongoose. In: Eisenberg JF, Kleiman DG (eds) Recent advances in the study of mammalian behavior. American Society of Mammologists, Shippensburg, Pennsylvania, pp 454–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Rood JP (1990) Group size, survival, reproduction, and routes to breeding in dwarf mongooses. Anim Behav 39:566–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts B, Nocolson N (1989) Reproduction in wild female olive baboons. Am J Primatol 19:229–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon CT, Ziegler TE, Widowski TM (1993) Further hormonal suppression of eldest daughter cotton-top tamarins following birth of infants. Am J Primat 31:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey PB, Koenig WD (eds) (1990) Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters JR, Seyfarth RM (1987) Conflict and cooperation. In: Smuts BB, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Wrangham RW, Struhsaker TT (eds) Primate societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 306–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrege PH, Emlen ST (1991) Breeding seasonality and reproductive success of white-fronted bee-eaters in Kenya. Auk 108:673–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Zack S, Rabenold KN (1989) Assessment, age and proximity in dispersal contests among cooperative wrens: field experiments. Anim Behav 38:235–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection — a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wrege, P.H., Emlen, S.T. Family structure influences mate choice in white-fronted bee-eaters. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35, 185–191 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167958

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167958

Key words

Navigation