Skip to main content
Log in

Inorganic nutrients, bacteria, and the microbial loop

  • Controls of the Microbial Loop: Nutrient Limitations
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The realization that natural assemblages of planktonic bacteria may acquire a significant fraction of their nitrogen and phosphorus via the uptake of dissolved inorganic nutrients has modified our traditional view of these microorganisms as nutrient remineralizers in plankton communities. Bacterial uptake of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus may place bacteria and phytoplankton in competition for growth-limiting nutrients, rather than in their traditional roles as the respective “source” and “sink” for these nutrients in the plankton. Bacterial nutrient uptake also implies that bacterivorous protozoa may play a pivotal role in the remineralization of these elements in the microbial loop. The overall contribution of bacterial utilization of inorganic nutrients to total nutrient uptake in the ocean is still poorly understood, but some generalizations are emerging with respect to the geographical areas and community physiological conditions that might elicit this behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benner R, Pakulski JD, McCarthy M, Hedges JI, Hatcher PG (1992) Bulk chemical characteristics of dissolved organic matter in the ocean. Science 255:1561–1564

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bratbak G, Thingstad TF (1985) Phytoplankton-bacteria interactions: an apparent paradox? Analysis of a model system with both competition and commensalism. Mar Ecol Prog Set 25:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caron DA (1991) Evolving role of protozoa in aquatic nutrient cycles. In: Reid PC, Turley CM. Burkill PH (ed) Protozoa and their role in marine processes, vol 25. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 387–415

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caron DA, Goldman JC, Dennett MR (1988) Experimental demonstration of the roles of bacteria and bacteriovorous protozoa in plankton nutrient cycles. Hydrobiologia 159:27–40

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cole JJ, Findlay S, Pace ML (1988) Bacterial production in fresh and saltwater ecosystems: a cross-system overview. Mar Ecol Prog Set 43:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. Currie DJ, Kalff J (1984) A comparison of the abilities of freshwater algae and bacteria to acquire and retain phosphorus. Limnol Oceanogr 29:298–310

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fenchel T, Finlay BJ (1983) Respiration rates in heterotrophic, free-living protozoa. Microb Ecol 9:99–122

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jürgens K, Güde H (1990) Incorporation and release of phosphorus by planktonic bacteria and phagotrophic flagellates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 59:271–284

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kirchman D (1994) The uptake of inorganic nutrients by heterotrophic bacteria. Microb Ecol 28:255–271

    Google Scholar 

  10. Suttle CA, Fuhrman JA, Capone DG (1990) Rapid ammonium cycling and concentration-dependent partitioning of ammonium and phosphate: implications for carbon transfer in planktonic communities. Limnol Oceanogr 35:424–433

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wheeler PA, Kirchman DL (1986) Utilization of inorganic and organic nitrogen by bacteria in marine systems. Limnol Oceanogr 31:998–1009

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caron, D.A. Inorganic nutrients, bacteria, and the microbial loop. Microb Ecol 28, 295–298 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166820

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166820

Keywords

Navigation