Abstract
The term ‘market forces’ has become one of the great clarion calls of the modern era. They are seen as providing the flexibility and responsiveness necessary to allow the satisfaction of consumer demands. Market forces is a term used chiefly to describe economic relationships. Can the characteristics of an economic system be used to characterise the wider society? In particular can increased flexibility and responsiveness to the needs of the consumer play a role in the shaping of Dutch educational policy?
In the Netherlands the exigency of financial restraint has prompted educational expenditure cuts. Concomitant to these has been a move towards decentralisation, with self-regulation at the institutional level. Moves that have been characterised as constituting a change in the power structure. This paper argues that the operation of market forces and the promotion of institutional autonomy requires financial independence. Without financial autonomy institutional autonomy may well be a pipe dream.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Acherman, H. A. (1988a). Retrenchment and Growth in the Netherlands, International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education 12(1), 41–48.
Acherman, H. A. (1988b). Quality Assessment by Peer Review: A New Area for University Cooperation, 10th European Forum of The Association for Institutional Research, Bergen, Norway, 15th–17th August.
Brouwer, R. & Bormans, R. (1987). Performance Indicators As a Go-Between; A Possible Government Perspective, 9th European Forum of The Association of Institutional Research, Enschede, The Netherlands, 23rd–26th August.
Brouwer, R. & McDaniel, O. (1987). The Future of Academic Research Under Rapid Change, 9th European Forum of The Association for Institutional Research, Enschede, The Netherlands, 23rd– 26th August.
Dochy F. J. R. C., Segers, M. S. R. & Wijnen W. H. F. W. (1987). Managerial Context of the Research Project: The Use of Performance Indicators As a Part of the New Steering Conception in the Netherlands. Department of Educational Research, Rijksuniversiteit Limburg, Maastricht.
Frackmann, E. & Muffo, J. A. (1988). Quality Control Hierarchies and Information: The Context of Rankings in an International Perspective, 10th European Forum of The Association for Institutional Research, Bergen, Norway, 15th–17th August.
Goedegebuure, L. C. J. & Meek, V. L. (1987). Change in Higher Education; The Non-University Sector, Management and Policy in Higher Education. Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies, Universiteit Twente.
Hirst, P. (1989). After Henry, New Statesman & Society, 21st July, pp. 18-19.
Mulgan, G. (1988). Collapse of the Pyramid of Power, The Guardian, 28th November, p. 20.
Scott, P. (1986). Retreat from Rambo, Times Higher Education Supplement, 28th February.
Sizer, J. (1988). The Management of Institutional Adaptation and Change under Conditions of Financial Stringency, Society for Research into Higher Education.
Sperna, J. (1989). Renovation Project in the Crucible, Times Higher Education Supplement, 24th February, p. 13.
Van Vught, F. A. (1988). A New Autonomy in European Higher Education? International journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education 12 (1), 16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geddes, A. The quest for institutional autonomy in the Dutch higher education sector. High Educ 20, 1–10 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162201
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162201