Abstract
Forty years ago sociology possessed a plethora of broad theories, some untestable and others merely untested. Merton rightly argued that global theorizing could be premature if the middle-range groundwork were not properly accomplished. At the present time sociology possesses a plethora of middle-range theories, and is close to paralyzing fragmentation. This paper argues that the time has come for a return to classical concerns as a complement (not an alternative) to continuing middle-range theorizing. Three strategies for macrosociological theorizing are presented: the divisive, aggregative, and direct. The divisive strategy is largely nonexistent, and Merton argued strongly against the direct, leaving the aggregative as his method of choice. We argue here that the concept of middle-range theory is vague, and it is exceedingly difficult to distinguish middle-range from non-middle-range theories. Out of 27 cells in our table, only 14 are identifiable as middle-range, and 9 are indeterminable. We argue that the aggregative strategy is probably not feasible at this time, but that all three strategies should be used, with an emphasis on the direct.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken Michael (1981). “Crossing the boundaries and building the bridges: linking sociology to the social sciences”, Sociological Quarterly 22: 447–470
Bailey Kenneth D. (1972). “Polythetic reduction of monothetic property space”, pp. 83–111 in Herbert L. Costner (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1972 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bailey Kenneth D. (1980). “Types of Systems”, Pp. 26–34 in Bela H. Banathy (ed.), Systems Science and Science, Louisville, Ky.: Society for General Systems Research.
Bailey Kenneth D. (1981). “Abstracted versus concrete sociological theory”, Behavioral Science 26: 313–323.
Bailey Kenneth D. (1984). “Beyond Functionalism” British Journal of Sociology 35: 1–18.
Bierstedt Robert (1960). “Sociology and human learning”, American Sociological Review 25: 3–9.
Blalock Hubert M.Jr. (1981). “The ASA: on moving the discipline to center stage”, The American Sociologist 16: 110–112.
Butler E. W. and S. N. Adams (1966). “Typologies of delinquent girls: some alternative approaches”, Social Forces 44: 401–407.
Collins Randall (1975). Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science New York: Academic Press.
Coser Lewis A. (1975). “Two methods in search of a substance”, American Sociological Review 40: 169–700.
Forrester J. W. (1973). World Dynamics. Second Edition, Cambridge, Mass.: Wright-Allen.
Galle Omer R., Candace Hinson Wiswell, and Jeffrey A. Burr (1985). “Racial mix and industrial productivity”, American Sociological Review 50: 20–33.
Guttman L. (1959). “Introduction to facet design and analysis”, pp. 130–132 in Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Congress of Psychology, Brussels, 1957 Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Kuhn Alfred (1974). The Logic of Social Systems, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Laumann Edward O., David Knoke, and Yong-Hak Kim (1985). “An organizational approach to state policy formation”, American Sociological Review 50: 1–19.
Lingoes James C. (1968). “An IBM 360/67 program for Guttman-Lingoes multidimensional scalogram analysis — III”, Behavioral Science 13: 512–513.
McCartney James L. (1981). “Diversity in sociology: crisis or challenge?”, The Sociological Quarterly 22: 459–465.
Meadows D. H., D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. Behrens (1972). The Limits to Growth New York: Universe Books.
Merton Robert K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure, New York: The Free Press.
Miller James Grier (1978) Living Systems, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Moore Wilbert E. (1981). “Can the discipline survive its practitioners?”, The American Sociologist 16: 56–58.
Opp Karl-Dieter (1970). “Theories of the middle range as a strategy for the construction of a general sociological theory: a critique of a sociological dogma”, Quality and Quantity 4: 243–253.
Parsons Talcott (1951). The Social System, New York: Free Press.
Parsons Talcott (1979). “Concrete systems and ‘abstracted’ systems”, Contemporary Sociology 8: 696–705.
Parsons Talcott and E. A. Shils (eds.) (1951). Toward a General Theory of Action. New York: Harper and Row.
Ritzer George (1979). “Toward an integrated sociological paradigm”, Pp. 25–46 in William E. Snizek, Ellsworth R. Fuhrman, and Michael K. Miller (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Theory and Research: A Metasociological Perspective, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Rossi Peter (1980). “Report of the President: Rossi expresses concern about diversity in sociology”, American Sociological Association Footnotes 8: 1, 7.
Sneath Peter H. A. and Robert R. Sokal (1973). Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Spilerman S. (1972). “Extensions of the mover-stayer model”, American Journal of Sociology 78: 599–626
Stryker Sheldon (1979). “The profession: comments from an interactionist's perspective”, Sociological Focus 12: 175–186.
Swanson Guy E. (1980). “For general sociology”, pp. 3–16 in Hubert M. BlalockJr. (ed.), Sociological Theory and Research: A Critical Appraisal, New York: Free Press.
Van den Berghe Pierre L. (1963). “Dialectic and functionalism: toward a theoretical synthesis”, American Sociological Review 28: 695–705
Wallerstein Immanuel (1974). The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century, New York: Academic Press.
White H. C., S. A. Boorman, and R. L. Breiger (1976). “Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions”, American Journal of Sociology 81: 730–780.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Revised version of a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Antonio, August, 1984.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bailey, K.D. Alternative procedures for macrosociological theorizing. Qual Quant 25, 37–55 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138755
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138755