Skip to main content
Log in

Limitations of methodological experiments

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extent to which empirical results can lead to methodological conclusions is investigated. No specific limitations are found to be involved in drawing conclusions on the plausibility of an artifact (Campbell).

Two other types of ‘meta-research’ do appear to be problematic: (a) empirically based inferences on the kind of roles adopted by subjects with respect to the experiment (Weber and Cook) are tenuous, since the role-playing may well enter into the meta-research itself; (b) a similar intricacy arises with research on experimenter expectancy effects (Rosenthal). Possible ways of correcting for artifacts in meta-research, and the potential threat to scientific discourse that is associated with these corrections, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barber, T. X. (1969), ‘Invalid arguments, postmortem analyses, and the experimenter bias effect’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 33, 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, T. X., Calverley, D. S., Forgione, A., McPeake, J. D., Chaves, J. F. and Bowen, B. (1969), ‘Five attempts to replicate the experimenter bias effect’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 33, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, T. X. and Silver, M. J. (1969), ‘Fact, fiction, and the experimenter bias effect’, Psychological Bulletin Monograph Supplement 70, No. 6, Pt. 2.

  • Barber, T. X. and Silver, M. J. (1968), ‘Pitfalls in data analysis and interpretation: A reply to Rosenthal’ Psychological Bulletin Monograph Supplement 70, No. 6, Pt. 2.

  • Campbell, D. T. (1969), ‘Prospective: Artifact and control’, in R. Rosenthal and R. L. Rosnow (eds.), Artifact in Behavioral Research (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. and Stanley, J. C. (1966), Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (Chicago: Rand McNally).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, R. W. (1970), A Sociology of Sociology (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (1972), Kritische Psychologie (Frankfurt, Germany: Fischer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lana, R. E. (1969), ‘Pretest sensitization’, in R. Rosenthal and R. L. Rosnow (eds.), Artifact in Behavioral Research (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, L. H. (1967), ‘Awareness, learning, and the beneficient subject as expert witness’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6, 365–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. ‘On the psychology of the psychological experiment’, in C. Scheerer (ed.), Cognition: Theory, Research, Promise (New York: Harper, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1968), ‘Logic and psychology’, American Psychologist 23, 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, J. H. and Schwartz, T. (1973), ‘Ethical standards as an independent variable in psychological research’, American Psychologist 28, 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. J. (1969), ‘The conditions and consequences of evaluation apprehension’, in R. Rosenthal and R. L. Rosnow (eds.), Artifact in Behavioral Research (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1966), Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1968), ‘Experimenter effects and the reassuring nature of the null hypothesis procedure’, Psychological Bulletin Monograph Supplement 70, No. 6.

  • Rosenthal, R. (1969a), ‘Interpersonal expectations: Effects of the experimenter's hypothesis’, in R. Rosenthal and R. L. Rosnow (eds.), Artifact in Behavioral Research (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1969b), ‘On not so replicated experiments and not so null results’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 33, 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. and Fode, K. L. (1963), ‘Three experiments in experimenter bias’, Psychological Reports 12, 491 -511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. and Rosnow, R. L. (eds.) (1969), Artifact in Behavioral Research (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosnow, R. L. and Seels, J. M. (1970), ‘Reactive effects of pretesting in attitude research’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 15, 338–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1964), ‘Views of human nature’, in T. W. Wann, Behaviorism and Phenomenology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, J. J. and Nataupsky, M. (1969), ‘Predicting the conclusions of negro-white intelligence research from biographical characteristics of the investigator’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8, 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigall, H., Aronson, E. and Van Hoose, T. (1970), ‘The cooperative subject: Myth or reality?’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 6, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H. and Jackson, D. D. (1967), Pragmatics of Human Communication (New York: Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, S. J. and Cook, T. D (1972), ‘Subject effects in laboratory research: An examination of subject role, demand characteristics, and valid inference’, Psychological Bulletin 77, 273–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1973), Personality and Prediction: Principles of Personality Assessment (Reading, Mass.: Addison).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hofstee, W.K.B. Limitations of methodological experiments. Theor Decis 9, 77–92 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138120

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138120

Keywords

Navigation