Skip to main content
Log in

Really taking Darwin seriously: An alternative to Michael Ruse's Darwinian metaethics

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Michael Ruse has proposed in his recent book Taking Darwin Seriously and elsewhere a new Darwinian ethics distinct from traditional evolutionary ethics, one that avoids the latter's inadequate accounts of the nature of morality and its failed attempts to provide a naturalistic justification of morality. Ruse argues for a sociobiologically based account of moral sentiments, and an evolutionary based casual explanation of their function, rejecting the possibility of ultimate ethical justification. We find that Ruse's proposal distorts, overextends and weakens both Darwinism and naturalism. So we propose an alternative Darwinian metaethics that both remedies the problems in Ruse's proposal and shows how a Darwinian naturalistic account of the moral good in terms of human fitness avoids the naturalistic fallacy and can provide genuine, even if limited, justifications for substantive ethical claims. Thus, we propose to really take Darwin seriously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R.: 1987, The Biology of Moral Systems, Adline De Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.: 1988, ‘Reductionism in Ethics and Science: A Contemporary Look at G. E. Moore's Open Question Argument’, American Philosophical Quarterly 25, 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, D.: 1984, ‘Moral Realism and the Skeptical Arguments from Disagreement and Queerness’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, D.: 1989, Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calicott, J.: 1984, ‘Non-Anthropocentric Value Theory and Environmental Ethics’, American Philosophical Quarterly 21, 299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.: 1978, ‘Social Morality as Evidence of Conflict Between Biological Human Nature and Social Requirement’, in G. Stent (ed.), Morality as a Biological Phenomenon, Abakon Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, pp. 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R.: 1984, ‘Sociobiology and the Possibility of Ethical Naturalism’, in D. Copp and D. Zimmerman (eds.), Morality, Reason and Truth, Rowan and Allanheld, Totowa, N.J.,pp. 270–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. and Pargetter, R.: 1986, ‘Goodness and Fragility’, American Philosophical Quarterly 23, 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M. and Hooker, C.: 1985, Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism with a Reply from Bas C. van Fraasen, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G.: 1988, ‘Fitness and Explanation’, in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.), PSA 1988: Proceedings of the 1988 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1871, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2 vols., Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edel, A.: 1980, Exploring Fact and Value, vol. 2, Science, Ideology and Value, Transaction Books, New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, O., Jr.: 1982, ‘Quinean Ethics’, Ethics 93, 56–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, W.: 1976, ‘Naturalistic Fallacy’, in K. Goodpaster (ed.), Perspective in Morality, Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H.: 1971, ‘Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person’, Journal of Philosophy 65, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A.: 1982, ‘Human Evolution and the Sense of Justice’, in P. French, T. Uehling, Jr., and H. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. VII: Social and Political Philosophy, The University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A.: 1987, ‘Red and Right’, The Journnal of Philosophy 84, 349–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1977, The Nature of Morality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M.: 1970, ‘Moral Development’, in P. Mussen (ed.), Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology (3rd ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 261–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M.: 1988, ‘Moral Development’, in M. Bornstein and M. Lamb (eds.), Developmental Psychology: An Advanced Textbook, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, C.: 1987, A Realistic Theory of Science, State University of New York Press, Albany, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchener, R.: 1987, ‘Is Genetic Epistemology Possible?’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1985, Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest of Human Nature, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. et al.: 1987, ‘Precis of Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature, Open Peer Commentary and Author's Response’, Behavior and Brain Sciences 10, 61–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1983, Essays in Moral Development, vol 2, The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature of and Validity Moral Stages, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblith, H. (ed.): 1985, Naturalizing Epistemology, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplin, J. (ed.): 1984, Scientific Realism, University of California Press, Berkeley, Ca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, C. and Wilson, E.: 1981, Genes, Mind and Culture, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J.: 1977, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J.: 1982, Evolution, Morality and the Meaning of Life, Rowman and Littlefield, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raddke-Yarrow, M., Zahn-Waxler, C. and Chapman, M.: 1983, ‘Children's Prosocial Development and Behavior’, in P. Mussen (ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology (4th ed.), Vol. IV, E. Hetherington (vol. ed.), Socialization, Personality, and Social Development, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 469–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railton, P.: 1986, ‘Moral Realism’, Philosophical Review 95, 163–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R.: 1986a, ‘A Defense of Evolutionary Ethics’, Biology and Philosophy 1, 265–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R.: 1986b, ‘Justification through Biological Faith: A Rejoinder’, Biology and Philosophy 1, 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R.: 1987, Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1979, Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense? Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1984, ‘The Morality of the Gene’, The Monist 67, 165–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1985, ‘Is Rape Wrong on Andromeda?’, in E. Regis (ed.), Extraterrestrials, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 43–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1986a, ‘Evolutionary Ethics: A Phoenix Arise n’, Zygon 21, 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1986b, Taking Darwin Seriously, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1987, ‘Darwinism and Determinism’, Zygon 21, 419–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. and Wilson, E.: ‘Ethics as Applied Science’, Philosophy 61, 173–192.

  • Scarrow, D.: 1981, ‘The Casuality of Reason: A Survey of Some Recent Developments in the Mind-Body Problem’, Metaphilosophy 12, 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P.: 1981, The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology, Farrar, Strauss and Geroux Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon, N.: 1984, ‘Moral Explanation’, in D. Copp and D. Zimmerman (eds.), Morality, Reason and Truth, Rowan and Allanheld, Totowa, N.J., pp. 79–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon, N.: 1986, ‘Harman on Moral Explanations of Natural Facts’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 24, Supplement, 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.: 1975, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.: 1978, On Human Nature, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors are equally responsible for the writing of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rottschaefer, W.A., Martinsen, D. Really taking Darwin seriously: An alternative to Michael Ruse's Darwinian metaethics. Biol Philos 5, 149–173 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127485

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127485

Key words

Navigation