Skip to main content
Log in

The political policy cycle: Presidential effort vs. presidential control

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After disentangling presidential budget proposals from budgetary changes attributable to fluctuations in the economy and to congressional action, we find consistent evidence for a presidential macroeconomic policy cycle attuned to the elctoral cycle. Proposed budgets are more expansionary in election years than at other times. The Congress, however, also plays a significant role in determining fiscal outcomes. Its budgets are systematically related to those of the President and in general reinforce presidential efforts to respond to the electoral cycle.

Although Presidents generally propose quite conservative budgets, their proposals are more expansionary in presidential election years than in other years. The Congress, which generally adopts an expansionary fiscal policy ratifies this proposed macroeconomic policy electoral cycle by adopting even more expansionary budgets in presidential election years than they do at other times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alt, J.E., and Chrystal, K.A. (1983). Political economics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy 82: 1095–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A.S. and Solow, R.M. (1974). Analytical foundations of fiscal policy. In A.S. Blinder and R.M. Solow et al. (Eds.), The economics of public finance. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M., and Wagner R.E. (1977). Democracy in deficit: The political legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLeeuw, F., et al. (1980), The high employment budget: New estimates, 1955–80. Survey of Current Business 60: 13–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLeeuw, F., and Holloway T.M. (1982). The high employment budget: Revised estimates and automatic inflation effects. Survey of Current Business 62: 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fair, R.C. (1978). The effect of economic events on votes for president. The Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. (1977). Congress: Keystone of the Washington establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. (1981). Short- and long-term effects of economic conditions on individual voting decisions. In D.A. Hibbs, Jr., and H. Fassbender (Eds.), Contemporary political economy. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.W., and Kamlet, M.S. (1984). Explaining presidential priorities: The competing aspiration levels model of macrobudgetary decision making. The American Political Science Review 78: 356–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S., and Schneider, F. (1978). An empirical study of politico-economic interaction in the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 174–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S., and Schneider, F. (1981). Recent research on empirical politico-economic models. In D.A. Hibbs, Jr. and H. Fassbender (Eds.), Contemporary political economy. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, D.G., and Poterba, J.M. (1980). The price of popularity: The political business cycle reexamined. American Journal of Political Science 60: 696–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D.A., Jr. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review 71: 1467–1487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D.A., Jr., and Fassbender, H. (1981). Contemporary political economy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, A. (1984). Elections, Keynes, bureaucracy and class: Explaining U.S. budget deficits, 1961–1978. American Sociological Review 49: 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamlet, M.S., and Mowery, D.C. (1985). Economic, political and institutional influences on executive and congressional budgetary priorities, 1953–1981. Mimeo.

  • Kiewit, R.D., and McCubbins, M.D. The effect of economic conditions, parties, and elections upon the congressional appropriations process. Mimeo. 35 pp.

  • Kiewit, R.D. (1983). Macroeconomics & micropolitics: The electoral effects of economic issues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, A. (1976). Stabilization policies in open economies with endogenous politicians. American Economic Review 66: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, C.D. (1977). A political model of the business cycle. Journal of Political Economy 85: 239–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W.D. (1975). The political business cycle. Review of Economic Studies 42: 169–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, N.J. (1985). The politics of the deficit. In Philip Cagan (Ed.), Contemporary economic problems: the economy in deficit. Washington, DC: The American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pack, J. (1986). The congress and fiscal policy. Mimeo. 29 pp.

  • Schick, A. (1980). Congress and money: budgeting, spending and taxing. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, H.E. (1984). Politics & the budget: The struggle between the president and the congress. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (1980). Asset accumulation and economic activity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E.R. (1978). Political control of the economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Paul Burnham's research assistance is gratefully acknowledged. He not only performed the routine chores of data gathering and processing but did both with a critical eye which often made substantive difference. My colleagues Arthur Frank, Charles Gilbert, Jack Nagel, and Paul Quirk were generous with their time, providing important references and detailed comments on earlier versions of the paper. Howard Pack has been an insightful critic at all stages of the work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pack, J.R. The political policy cycle: Presidential effort vs. presidential control. Public Choice 54, 231–259 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125648

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125648

Keywords

Navigation