Skip to main content
Log in

A genetic cluster algorithm for the machine-component grouping problem

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This research presents the usage of a genetic algorithm for the clustering of parts and machines. A detailed analysis is shown comparing GCA results with single link cluster analysis, rank order clustering, and the direct clustering algorithm. GCA was also compared with several additional cell formation heuristics described in the recent literature, including GRAPHICS, MODROC, and a cost-based heuristic. Results showed that the GCA was far superior over single link cluster analysis and provided equivalent results to those of the direct clustering algorithm and rank order clustering. GCA was also found to provide superior results to the other heuristics. The discussion explains these findings by illustrating the inflexibility of traditional cell formation heuristics in the selection of final machine-component groupings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahim, M. (1992) Heuristic algorithm for the generalized group technology problem, MS Thesis, Technion-Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askin, R. and Subramanian, S. (1987) A cost-based heuristic for group technology configuration. International Journal of Production Research, 25, 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biegel, J. E. and Davern, J. J. (1990) Genetic algorithms and job shop scheduling. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 19, 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge, J. L. (1975) The Introduction of Group Technology, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, H. M. and Milner, D. A. (1984) Direct clustering algorithm for group formation in cellular manufacture. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 1(1), 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekharan, M. and Rajagopalan, R. (1989) Groupability: an analysis of the properties of binary data matrices for group technology. International Journal of Production Research, 27, 1035–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B. (1980) Cluster Analysis, Halsted Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourman, M. P. (1985) Compaction of symbolic layout using genetic algorithms, in Proceedings International Conference on Genetic Algorithms Applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. E. (1989) Genetic Algorithms, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, H. S. and Hon, K. K. B. (1992) New approaches for the nesting of two-dimensional shapes for press tool design. International Journal of Production Research, 30(4), 825–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. R. (1980) Machine-component grouping in production flow analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 18(2), 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, J. (1972) Machine grouping for efficient production. Production Engineer, February, 53–57.

  • Seifoddini, H. (1989) A note on the similarity coefficient method and the problem of improper machine assignment in group technology applications. International Journal of Production Research, 27, 1161–1165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, T. and Billo, R. (1994) A demand-based method for manufacturing cell design and replication. International Journal of Manufacturing System Design, 1(3), 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, G. and Narendran, T. (1991) GRAFICS - a nonhierarchical clustering algorithm for group technology. International Journal of Production Research, 29, 463–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, G., Narendran, T. and Mahadevan, B. (1990) An assignment model for the part-families problem in group technology. International Journal of Production Research, 28, 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, D. M. and Smith, A. E. (1995) Unequal area facility layout using genetic search. IIE Transactions, 27, 465–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, J. A. and White, J. A. (1984) Facilities Planning, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakharia, A. J. (1986) Methods of cell formation in group technology: a framework for evaluation. Journal of Operations Management, 6(3), 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancza, J. and Markus, A. (1991) Genetic algorithms in process planning. Computers In Industry, 17, 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venugopal, V. and Narendran, T. T. (1992) A genetic algorithm approach to the machine-component grouping problem with multiple objectives. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 22(4), 469–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wemmerlov, U. and Hyer, N. L. (1986) Procedures for the part family/machine group identification problem in cellular manufacturing. Journal of Operations Management, 6(2), 125–147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Billo, R.E., Bidanda, B. & Tate, D. A genetic cluster algorithm for the machine-component grouping problem. J Intell Manuf 7, 229–241 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118082

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118082

Keywords

Navigation