Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of delivery terms on stock return volatility

  • Published:
Journal of Financial Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The application of generalized ARCH models to daily stock returns shows changes in delivery and payment terms to be an important factor in determining measured volatility. In contrast, the holding period between trading days when markets are closed is relatively unimportant. This new approach allows fresh insights into stock return volatility and indicates that subsequent research on stock return volatility should incorporate the effects of payment delays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baillie, Richard T., and Bollerslev, Tim. “The Message in Daily Exchange Rates: A Conditional Variance Tale.”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 7 (1989), 297–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, E.K., Hall, B.H., Hall, R.E., and Hausman, J. “Estimation and Inference in Nonlinear Structural Models.”Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 4 (1974), 653–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, Tim. “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.”Journal of Econometrics 31 (1986), 307–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • “A Conditional Heteroskedastic Time Series Model for Speculative Prices and Rates of Return.”Review of Economics and Statistics 69 (1987), 542–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGennaro, Ramon P. “Payment Delays: Bias in the Yield Curve.”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 20 (1988), 684–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyl, Edward A., and Martin, Stanley A.Jr. “Weekend Effects on Stock Returns: A Comment.”Journal of Finance 40 (1985), 347–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, Robert F. “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation.”Econometrica 50 (1982), 987–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, Robert F., and Bollerslev, Tim. “Modelling the Persistence of Conditional Variances.”Econometric Reviews 5 (1986), 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, Eugene F. “The Behavior of Stock Market Prices.”Journal of Business 38 (1965), 34–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, Kenneth. “Stock Returns and the Weekend Effect.”Journal of Financial Economics 7 (1980), 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, Kenneth, and Roll, Richard. “Stock Return Variances: The Arrival of Information and the Reaction of Traders.”Journal of Financial Economics 17 (1986), 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, Kenneth, Schwert G. William, and Stambaugh, Robert F. “Expected Stock Returns and Volatility.”Journal of Financial Economics 19 (1987), 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, Michael, and Hess, Patrick. “Day of the Week Effects and Asset Returns.”Journal of Business 54 (1981), 579–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, George G., Hill R. Carter, Griffiths, William E., Lutkepohl, Helmut, and Lee, Tsoung-Chao.Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kon, Stanley J. “Models of Stock Returns—A Comparison.”Journal of Finance 39 (1984), 147–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakonishok, Josef, and Levi, Maurice. “Weekend Effects on Stock Returns: A Note.”Journal of Finance 37 (1982), 883–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Weekend Effects on Stock Returns: A Reply.”Journal of Finance 40 (1985), 351–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakonishok, Josef, and Smidt, Seymour. “Are Seasonal Anomalies Real? A Ninety-Year Perspective.”Review of Financial Studies 1 (1988), 403–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, Benoit. “The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices.”Journal of Business 36 (1963), 394–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCurdy, Thomas H., and Morgan, Ieunan G. “Tests of the Martingale Hypothesis for Foreign Currency Futures with Time Varying Volatility.”International Journal of Forecasting 3 (1987), 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagan, Adrian, and Ullah, Aman. “The Econometric Analysis of Models with Risk Terms.”Journal of Applied Econometrics 3 (1988), 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogalski, Richard J., and Vinso, Joseph D. “Empirical Properties of Foreign Exchange Rates.”Journal of International Business Studies 9 (1978), 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, Richard. “Vas Is Das? The Turn-of-the-Year Effect and the Return Premia of Small Firms.”Journal of Portfolio Management 9 (1983), 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, Myron, and Williams, Joseph. “Estimating Betas from Nonsynchronous Data.”Journal of Financial Economics 5 (1977), 309–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, William F. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk.”Journal of Finance 19 (1964), 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirlock, Michael, and Starks, Laura. “Day-of-the-Week and Intraday Effects in Stock Returns.”Journal of Financial Economics 17 (1986), 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerfield, Janice M. “An Examination of Foreign Exchange Risk Under Fixed and Floating Rate Regimes.”Journal of International Economics 7 (1977), 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baillie, R.T., DeGennaro, R.P. The impact of delivery terms on stock return volatility. J Finan Serv Res 3, 55–76 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114078

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114078

Keywords

Navigation