Skip to main content
Log in

A multivariate approach to the selection of biological reserves

  • Papers
  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Multivariate analysis provides an effective context for the examination of some significant aspects of biodiversity and conservation. The framework is a multidimensional space that integrates sample sites, taxa and environments. This approach enables terms such as representativeness, complementarity and irreplaceability to be integrated within an intuitive and practical framework for reserve design. Cluster analysis is proposed to determine ‘what is there’ by defining a set of complementary clusters. These clusters are sampled in a representative manner; from the core outward. The degree of irreplaceability of a site is defined as the multivariate distance of each potential reserve site to its nearest neighbour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, M.P. (1985) Continuum concept, ordination methods, and niche theory. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 29–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M.P., Cunningham, R.B. and Good, R.B. (1983) Altitudinal distribution of several Eucalypt species in relation to other environmental factors in southern New South Wales. Aust. J. Ecol. 8, 169–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M.P., Cunningham, R.B. and Flemming, P.M. (1984) New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalers and statistical curve fitting procedures. Vegetatio 55, 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M.P. and Margules, C.R. (1984) The concept of representativeness in conservation evaluation with particular relevance to Australia. CSIRO Division of Water and Land Resources Technical Memorandum 84/11. Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M.P. and Margules, C.R. (1986) Assessing representativeness. In Wildlife Conservation Evaluation (M.B., Usher, ed.) pp. 45–67. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M.P., Nicholls, A.O. and Margules, C.R. (1990) Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environment niches of five Eucalyptus species. Ecol. Monogr. 60, 161–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbin, L. (1987a) PATN Reference Manual. Canberra: CSIRO Division of Wildlife & Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbin, L. (1987b) The use of non-hierarchical clustering of methods in the classification of large sets of data. Aust. Compl J. 19, 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbin, L. (1993) Environmental representativeness: regional partitioning and reserve selection. Biol. Conserv. 66, 223–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzecri, J.-P. (1973) L'Analyse des Données. Tome II; L'Analyse des Correspondence. Paris: 070 Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, J. R. (1986) A biogeographic analysis of Nothofagus cunninhamii (Hook.) Oerst. in southeastern Australia. Aust. J. Ecol. 11, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology (1990) Forest issues: Processes and Tools for Inventory, Evaluation, Mediation and Allocation. Canberra: CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, D.J. (1991) Energy and large-scale patterns of animal and plant species richness. Am. Nat. 137, 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czekanowski, J. (1913) Zarys metod statystycznych w zastosowaniu do anthtopolgii. Warszawa: Naklad Towaraystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D.P. (1992) conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D.P. and Walker, P.A. (1994) Diversity: Reference and Users Guide. Version 2.1. Canberra: CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D.P., Minchin, P.R. and Belbin, L. (1987) Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance: a theoretical model and computer simulations. Vegetatio 69, 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D.P. and Norris, R.H. (1989) Correlation of environmental variables with patterns of distribution and abundance of common and rare freshwater macroinvertebrates. Biol. conserv. 50, 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelbach, F.R. (1975) Investigation, evaluation, and priority ranking of natural areas. Biol. Conserv. 8, 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O. (1973a) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54 427–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O. (1973b) Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination. J. Ecol. 61, 237–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, J.B. (1983) An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biol. Conserv. 25, 127–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, B.G., Nix, H.A., Hutchinson, M.F. and McMahon, J.P. (1988) Assessing representativeness of places for conservation reservation and heritage listing. Environ. Manage. 12, 501–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R. and Usher, M.B. (1981) Criteria in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biol. Conserv. 21, 79–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R., Nicholls, A.O. and Pressey, R.L. (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Bio. Conserv. 43, 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R., Cresswell, I.D. and Nicholls, A.O. (1994) A scientific basis for establishing networks of protected areas. In Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (P., Forey, C.J., Humphries and R.I., Vane-Wright, eds.) Systematics Association Special Volume 50, 127–350, Clarendon Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nix, H. (1982) Environmental determinants of biogeography and evolution in Terra Australis. In Evolution of the Flora and Fauna of Arid Australia (W.J.R., Baker and P.J.M., Greenslade, eds) pp. 47–66. South Australia: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R.L., Johnson, I.R. and Wilson, P.D. (1994) Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodiver. Conserv. 3, 242–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R.L., Humphries, C.J., Margules, C.R., Vane-Wright, R.I. and Williams, P.H. (1993) Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. TREE 8, 124–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1989a) Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring versus iterative approaches. Biol. Conserv. 50, 199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1989b) Application of a numerical algorithm to the selection of reserves in semi-arid New South Wales. Biol. Conserv. 50, 263–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubbs, C.R. and Blackwood, J.W. (1971) Ecological evaluation of land for planning purposes. Biol. Conserv. 3, 169–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der, Ploeg, S.W.F. and Vlijm, L. (1978) Ecological evaluation, nature conservation and the use of planning with particular reference to methods used in the Netherlands. Biol. Conserv. 14, 197–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J. and Williams, P.H. (1991) What to protect —systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. (1978) Ordination of plant communities, 2nd ed. The Hague: Junk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W.T. (1976) Pattern analysis in agricultural science. Melbourne: CSIRO and Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. (1970) Conservation as an emerging concept. Melbourne: Australian Conservation Foundation Occasional Publications No. 2.

  • Woinarski, J. and Norton, T. (1993) Issues Paper: Towards a National System of Forest Reserves. Canberra: Environment and Conservation Policy Division, Department of Arts, Sport, the Environment and Territories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, J.L. and Currie, D.J. (1993) Species-energy theory and patterns of species richness: I. Patterns of bird, angiosperm, and mammal species richness on islands. Biol. Conserv. 63, 137–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belbin, L. A multivariate approach to the selection of biological reserves. Biodivers Conserv 4, 951–963 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058206

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058206

Keywords

Navigation