Skip to main content
Log in

The failure to obtain sexual isolation by artificial selection

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Avise, J.C. (1976). Genetic differenciation during speciation. In: Molecular evolution. F. Ayala, ed. Sinauer Ass, Inc., 106–122.

  • Ayala, F. (1978). Selection for reproductive isolation in Drosophila. XIV Int. Conf. Genet. Moscow. Abstr, part 1: 466.

  • Crossley, S.A. (1974). Changes in mating behaviour produced by selection for ethological isolation between ebony and vestigial mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 28(4): 631–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th. (1940). Speciation as a stage in genetic divergence. Am. Nat. 74: 312–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th. & O. Pavlovsky (1971). Experimentally created incipient species of Drosophila. Nature 230 (5292): 289–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. (1971). Natural selection for the origin of reproductive isolation. Am. Nat. 105: 479–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. & C. Petit (1968). Genotype frequency and mating success in the willistoni species group of Drosophila. Evolution 22: 649–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elens, A.A. & J.M. Wattiaux (1964). Direct observation of sexual isolation. Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 39: 118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukatami, A. & D. Moriwaki (1970). Selection for sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster by a modification of Koopman's method. Jap. J. Genet. 45: (3): 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, S. (1966). Selection for and against ethological isolation between D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Evolution 20: 634–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, O. (1978). The origin of sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Gen. Part I: 463.

  • Knight, G.R., A.L. Robertson & C.H. Waddington (1956). Selection for sexual isolation within a species. Evolution 10: 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, K.J. (1950). Natural selection for reproductive isolation between D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Evolution 4: 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malagolowkin-Cohen, Ch., A. Solima-Simmons & H. Levene (1965). A study of sexual isolation between certain strains of D. paulistorum. Evolution 19: 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1970). Populations, species and evolution. Belknap Press, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, S. (1960). An experimental study of sexual isolation within the species D. melanogaster. Anim, Behav. 8 (3–4): 232–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, C., O. Kitagawa & T. Takamura (1976). Mating system between Japanese and French geographic strains of D. melanogaster. Jap. J. Genet. 51: 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F.W. (1966). A test of sexual isolation in Drosophila. Genet. Res. 8: 181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. (1950). An experiment on sexual isolation. Dros. Inf. Serv. 24: 94–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. (1954). Genetic divergence of isolated populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Caryologia 6 (Suppl.): 761–764.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Equipe de Recherche Associée au CNRS: Analyse et mécanismes de maintien du polymorphisme

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petit, C., Kitagawa, O., Takanashi, E. et al. The failure to obtain sexual isolation by artificial selection. Genetica 54, 213–219 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055994

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055994

Keywords

Navigation