Abstract
This paper presents a system-theoretic approach to the analysis of the problem of training formally relating it to the control of an abstract dynamic system, the “adaption automaton” of the trainee. The utility of this formulation and the possibility of basing real training strategies upon it are discussed, and it is argued that further constraints upon the automaton are both necessary, and available, in so far as the theory corresponds to practical reality. The minimal constraints generate an extended theory in which training is related to the stability of the adaption automaton. More practical constraints lead to theoretical foundations for strategies of “feedback” or “adaptive” training. Corresponding to each set of constraints a “training theorem” is proved which demonstrates that the constraint is adequate to lead to a simple universal training strategy.
Although this paper is highly theoretical it is argued that the formal concepts introduced correspond to intuitive models of the phenomena of learning and training which are implicit in the design of many training systems. It is hoped that the formal analysis will throw new light on these implicit assumptions and help to clarify discussion of practical approaches to training, including the possibility of “computer-aided instruction” given on our present level of knowledge of human cognitive skills or individual students.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbib M. A. (1965). “A Common Framework for Automata Theory and Control Theory”. SIAM J. Contr., 3: 206–222.
Arbib M. A. (1966). “Automata Theory and Control Theory: a Rapprochement”, Automatica, 3: 161–189.
Arbib M. A. and Manes E. G. (1973). “Adjoint Machines, State-Behaviour Machines, and Duality”. COINS Tech. Rep. 73 B-1, University of Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Ashby, W. R. (1960). Design for a Brain. Chapman and Hall.
Bellman, R. (1957). Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press.
Clifford, A. H. and Preston, G. B. (1961). The Algebraic Theory of Semigroups, I. American Mathematical Society.
Gaines B. R. (1968). “Training the Human Adaptive Controller”. Proc. IEE, 115, (8): 1183–1189.
Gaines, B. R. (1971). “Memory Minimisation in Control with Stochastic Automata”. Electronics Letters, 7 (24).
Gaines B. R. (1972a). “The Learning of Perceptual-Motor Skills by Men and Machines and its Relationship to Training”. Instructional Science, Vol 1(3) 263–312.
Gaines B. R. (1972b). “Axioms for Adaptive Behaviour”. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4 (2): 169–199.
Goguen J. A. (1973a). “Relisation is Universal”. Mathematical Systems Theory, 6 (4): 359–374.
Goguen, J. A. (1973b). “Discrete-Time Machines in Closed Monoidal Categories, I”. Journal of Computer and System Sciences.
Gold E. M. (1971). “Universal Goal-Seekers”. Information and Control, 18: 395–403.
Kalman R. E. (1962). “Canonical Structure of Linear Dynamical Systems”. Proc. Nat. Acad. of Sci. (USA), 48: 596–600.
Kilmer W. L. and Arbib M. A. (1973). “An Automaton Framework for Neural Networks that Learn”. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 5 (4): 577–583.
MacLeod, R. B. (1964) “Phenomenology: A Challenge to Experimental Psychology. In: T. W. Wann (Ed.)., Behaviorism and Phenomenology. University of Chicago Press.
Macklin R. (1972). “Reasons vs. Causes in Explanation of Action”. Phil. and Phenom. Res., 33 (1):78–89.
Malcolm, N. (1964). “Behaviorism as a Philosophy of Psychology”. In: T. W. Wann (Ed.), Behaviorism and Phenomenology. University of Chicago Press.
Pask G. (1960). “The Teaching Machine as a Control Mechanism”. Transactions of the Society for Instrument Technology, 12 (2): 72–82.
Pask, G. (1965). “Teaching as a Control—engineering Process”. Control.
Pask, G. (1967). “Man as a System that Needs to Learn”. In D. J. Stewart (Ed.), Automaton Theory and Learning Systems. Academic Press.
Putnam H. (1964): “Robots: Machines or artificially Created Life?” J. Philos., 61 (21): 668–691.
Rorty R., (1972). “Functionalism, Machines and Incorrigibility”. J. Philos., 69 (8): 203–220.
Sher G. (1973). “Causal Explanation and the Vocabulary of Action”. Mind, 82 (325): 22–30.
Weizenbaum J. (1966). “ELIZA — A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication Between Man and Machine”. Comm. ACM, 9: 36–45.
Wexler J. D. (1970). “A Teaching Program that Generates Simple Arithmetic Problems”. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 2: 1.
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaines, B.R. Training, stability and control. Instr Sci 3, 151–176 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053496
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053496