Skip to main content
Log in

Inequalities concerning the expected selection differentials

  • General
  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many situations two populations are compared on the basis of subsets of the available data. If this is done using the same fraction of “best” records, then the expectations of the arithmetic means of these fractions are strictly ordered in magnitude by the ordering of the sample sizes. The results are illustrated with the special cases of the uniform and negative exponential distributions, for which further inequalities are derived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamovié, D. D. and Taskovié, M. R. (1969). Monotony and the best possible bounds of some sequences of sums, Publikacije Elektrotehničkog Fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu, Serija: Matematika i Fizika, No. 247-3, 41–50.

  • Beckenbach, E. F. and Bellman, R. (1961). Inequalities, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W. A. (1968). Manual of Procedures in Quantitative Genetics, Washington State University Press, Pullman, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, P. M. (1972). Expected selection differentials for directional selection, Biometretrics, 28, 1091–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, P. M. (1975). Variances of selection differentials in normal samples, Biometrics, 31, 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, H. A. (1981). Order Statistics, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, W. (1971). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. II, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, R. (1989). A sampling artifact in the UGC evaluation of research performance, Bri. J. Math. Statist. Psych., 42, 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, H. L. (1961). Expected values of normal order statistics, Biometrika, 48, 151–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrinovié, D. S. (1970). Analytic Inequalities, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraja, H. N. (1981). Some finite sample results for the selection differential, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 33, 437–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraja, H. N. (1982). Some nondegenerate limit laws for see selection differential, Ann. Statist., 10, 1306–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraja, H. N. (1984). Some nondegenerate limit laws for sample selection differential and selection differential, Sankhyã Ser. A, 46, 355–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, L. R., VanVleck, L. D. and Velasco, J. A. (1970). The use of order statistics with selected records, Biometrics, 26, 854–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitto, G. P. (1964). Some relations between expectations of order statistics in samples of different sizes, Biometrika, 51, 259–262.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

English, B.J., Gillett, R. & Phillips, M.J. Inequalities concerning the expected selection differentials. Ann Inst Stat Math 44, 169–175 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048679

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048679

Key words and phrases

Navigation