Skip to main content
Log in

The wedge subjected to tractions: a paradox re-examined

  • Published:
Journal of Elasticity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The classical two-dimensional solution for the stress distribution in an elastic wedge loaded by a uniform pressure on one side of the wedge becomes infinite when the wedge angle 2α satisfies the equation tan 235-1. This paradox was resolved recently by Dempsey who obtained a solution which is bounded at 235-2. However, for α not equal but very close to 235-3, the classical solution can still be very large as α approaches 235-4. In this paper we re-examine the paradox. We obtain a solution which remains bounded as α approaches 235-5 and reproduces Dempsey's solution in the limit 235-6. At 235-7 the stress distribution contains a (ln r) term for general loadings. The (ln r) term disappears under a special loading and the stresses are bounded for all r. Moreover, the solution is not unique. In other words, for the wedge angle 235-8 under a special loading, infinitely many solutions exist for which the stresses are bounded for all r. We also obtain solutions which are bounded and approach Dempsey's solutions when 2α=π and 2π. Again, under a special loading infinitely many solutions exist for which the stresses are bounded for all r. Care has been exercised in this paper to present the solutions in a form in which the terms r and ln r are replaced by R -gl and ln R where R=r/r 0is the dimensionless radial distance and r 0 is an arbitrary constant having the dimension of length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.P. Timoshenko and J.N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 3rd edn., 1970, p. 141.

  2. E. Sternberg, and W.T. Koiter, The wedge under a concentrated couple: a paradox in the two-dimensional theory of elasticity. J. Appl. Mech. 25 (1958) 575–581. (See also the discussion in Vol. 26 (1959) 472–474.)

    Google Scholar 

  3. W.W. Klingbeil, and R.T. Shield, On a class of solutions in plane finite elasticity. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 17 (1966) 489–511.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.K. Moffatt, and B.R. Duffy, Local similarity solutions and their limitations. J. Fluid Mech. 96 (1980) 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.P. Dempsey, The wedge subjected to tractions: a paradox resolved. J. Elasticity 11 (1981) 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.L. Williams, Stress singularities resulting from various boundary conditions in angular corners of plates in extension. J. Appl. Mech. 19 (1952) 526–528.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T.C.T. Ting and S.C. Chou, Edge singularities in anisotropic composites, Int. J. Solids Structures 17 (1981) 1057–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.H. England, On stress singularities in linear elasticity. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 9 (1971) 571–585.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.P. Dempsey and G.B. Sinclair, On the stress singularities in the plane elasticity of the composite wedge, J. Elasticity 9 (1979) 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.P. Dempsey, Private communications.

  11. T.C.T. Ting, A paradox on the elastic wedge subjected to a concentrated couple and on the Jeffery-Hamel viscous flow problems. Zeit. Ang. Math. Mech. To appear.

  12. T.C.T. Ting, Elastic wedge subjected to anti-plane shear tractions — A paradox explained. Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics (to appear).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ting, T.C.T. The wedge subjected to tractions: a paradox re-examined. J Elasticity 14, 235–247 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041136

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041136

Keywords

Navigation