Skip to main content
Log in

General principles of on-shore cultivation of seaweeds: effects of light on production

  • Cultivation
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous species of seaweed have been successfully cultivated in the sea for commercial purposes. Although considerable experimental work has been done on on-shore cultivation systems, none of these has yet proved to be economically viable on a sustained basis; nevertheless, such cultivation systems offer the potential for productivities greater than can be achieved in other systems. In on-shore systems, factors other than light can be controlled and provided at saturation levels. As density of biomass is controllable, all the light entering the cultivation system is absorbed. This results in efficient conversion of light energy to biomass when only light is limiting; moreover, density, rather than growth rate, is the major factor determining productivity. As growth of seaweeds in on-shore systems is only vegetative, there is no interruption for reproduction or maturation of the plants, and all of the net production can be recovered. Seaweeds have, though, relatively low percentage carbon composition, compared with terrestrial plants, and this may result in apparent high productivities based on dry matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bidwell, R. G. S., N. D. H. Lloyd & J. McLachlan, 1984. The performance of Chondrus crispus (Irish moss) in laboratory simulations of environments in different locations. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 11: 292–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell, R. G. S. & J. McLachlan, 1985. Carbon nutrition of seaweeds: photosynthesis, respiration and photorespiration. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 86: 15–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell, R. G. S., J. McLachlan & N. D. H. Lloyd, 1985. Tank cultivation of Irish moss, Chondrus crispus Stackh. Bot. mar. 28: 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugbee, B. G. & F. B. Salisbury, 1988. Exploring the limits of crop productivity. I. Photosynthetic efficiency of wheat in high irradiance environments. Pl. Physiol. 88: 869–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. W. & T. Aarup, 1989. Photosynthetically available radiation at high latitudes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 34: 1490–1499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles-Edwards, D. A., D. Doley & G. M. Rimmington, 1986. Modelling Plant Growth and Development. Academic Press, New York, 235 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craigie, J. S., 1989. Irish moss cultivation: some reflections. In Yarish C., C. A. Penniman & P. van Patten (eds). Economically Important Plants of the Atlantic: Their Biology and Cultivation. Connecticut Sea Grant Program, Marine Science Institute, University of Connecticut, Groton CT, 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craigie, J. S. & P. F. Shacklock, 1989. Culture of Irish moss. In Boghen A. D. (ed.). Cold-water Aquaculture in Atlantic Canada, The Canadian Institute of Research and Regional Development, Moncton NB, 243–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deveau, L., 1989. cultivation of Chondrus crispus. XII'th Int. Seaweed Symp. Vancouver, BC. (Abstracts TB5).

  • Doty, M. S., 1987. The production and use of Eucheuma. In Doty M. S., J. F. Caddy & B. Santelices (eds). Case studies of seven commercial seaweed resources. FAO Technical Paper 281, Rome: 123–164.

  • Drew, K. M., 1949. Conchocelis—phase in the life history of Porphyra umbilicalis (L.) Kütz. Nature London 164: 748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, C. T. & J. S. Craigie, 1981. Effects of temperature and irradiance on growth and respiration of Chondrus crispus Stackh. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 10: 271–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khailov, K. M. & YuG. Kamenir, 1988. Photoassimilation surface of plants and its correlation with the respiratory surface of animals in size rows. J. gen. Biol. 49: 844–853 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khailov, K. M. & V. A. Silkin, 1986. Ecological classification of aquaculture bioproductive systems with respect to their aquaculture quality. J. gen. Biol. 47: 769–779 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, J. T. O., 1983. Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Ecosystems. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 401 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, M. M. & D. S. Littler, 1980. The evolution of thallus form and survival strategies in benthic marine macroalgae: Field and laboratory tests of a functional form model. Am. Nat. 116: 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, N. D. H., J. L. McLachlan & R. G. S. Bidwell, 1981. A rapid infra-red carbon-dioxide analysis screening technique for predicting growth and productivities of marine algae. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 10: 461–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, D. J. ed., 1987. Production and utilization of products from commercial seaweeds. FAO Tech. Paper 288, Rome 189 pp.

  • McHugh, D. J., 1991. Worldwide distribution of commercial resources of seaweeds including Gelidium. Hydrobiologia 221: 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, J., 1973. Growth media-marine. In Stein J. R. (ed). Handbook of Phycological Methods: Culture Methods and Growth Measurements. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge: 25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, J., 1985. Microalgae (seeweeds): industrial resources and their utilization. Plant & Soil 89: 137–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, J., R. G. S. Bidwell, R. G. Smith & C. M. Moseley, 1986. Cultivation strategies for seaweeds. In Westermeir R. (ed.) Actas II Congr. Nacional sobre Algas Marinas Chilenas. Univ. Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile, 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. M., 1984. Modelling environmental effects on crop productivity. In Pearson C. J. (ed.) Control of crop productivity. Academic Press, New York: 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, J. M., 1978. Essential considerations for establishing seaweed extraction factories. In Krauss R. W. (ed.). The Marine Plant Biomass of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Oregon State Univ. Press, Corvallis, OR: 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, S. L. & K. Sand-Jensen, 1990. Allometric scaling of maximal photosynthetic growth rate to surface/volume ratio. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35: 177–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neish, A. C., P. F. Shacklock, C. H. Fox & D. R. Robson, 1978. The cultivation of Chondrus crispus. Factors affecting growth under greenhouse conditions. Can. J. Bot. 55: 2263–2271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryther, J. H., J. A. DeBoer & B. E. Lapointe, 1979. Cultivation of seaweeds of hydrocolloids, waste treatment and biomass for energy. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 9: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santelices, B. & R. Ugarte, 1990. Ecological differences among Chilean populations of commercial Gracilaria. J. appl. Phycol. 2: 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, 1927. Die Reinkultur von marinen Phytoplankton und deren Bedeutung für die Erforschung de Produktionsfähigkeit des Meerwassers. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch. N.F. 16: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornley, J. H. M., 1990. A new formulation of the logistic growth equation and its application to leaf area growth. Ann. Bot. 66: 309–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, W. N. 1988. Algal productivity and hydrodynamics — a synthesis. Progr. Phycol. Res. 6: 23–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. N., 1952. Forward. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 1: iv.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLachlan, J.L. General principles of on-shore cultivation of seaweeds: effects of light on production. Hydrobiologia 221, 125–135 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028369

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028369

Key words

Navigation