Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic transformation of Eustoma grandiflorum Griseb. by microprojectile bombardment

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Foreign DNA was introduced into cell suspension cultures and leaf tissue of Eustoma grandiflorum Griseb. (lisianthus) by microprojectile bombardment. For this purpose a low-cost bombardment device that uses a helium flux to accelerate microprojectiles was built. When cell suspensions were used, an average of 4.1 Kan resistant calli were recovered per shot after 4 months' cultivation on selective medium. Most of the Kan resistant plants regenerated from calli were positive to GUS assay. Both the nptII and gus genes were successfully amplified from alkali-treated leaves of putative transgenic plants by PCR analysis. Transgenic plants were not recovered from bombarded leaves. Considering the host range specificity of Agrobacterium, and the response of the species to plant regeneration from suspension culture, microprojectile bombardment is, at present, the most efficient procedure for genetic transformation of lisianthus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BA:

6-benzyladenine

Cx:

cefotaxime

2,4 D:

(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid

FDA:

fluorescein diacetate

gus :

β-glucuronidase

IAA:

indole-3-acetic acid

IBA:

indole-3-butyric acid

2iP:

(2-isopentenyl) adenine

Kan:

kanamycin

nptII :

neomycin phosphotransferase II

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

References

  • Damiano, C., P. Curir, P. Esposito & B. Ruffoni, 1986. La propagazione in vitro di Lisianthus russelianus Hook. Ann. Ist. Sper. Flor. Sanremo Vol. XVII-1.

  • Dong J.Z. & A. McHughen, 1993. An improved procedure for production of transgenic flax plants using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Sci. 88: 61–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finer J.J., P. Vain, M.W. Jones & M.D. McMullen, 1992. Development of the particle inflow gun for DNA delivery to plant cells. Plant Cell Rep. 11: 323–328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halevy A.H. & A.M. Kofranek, 1984. Evaluation of Lisianthus as a new flower crop. HortScience 19: 845–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handa T., 1992. Regeneration and characterization of prairie gentian (Eustoma grandiflorum) plant transformed by Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Plant Tissue Culture Letters 9: 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen B. & R.C. Gardner, 1989. Localized transient expression of GUS in leaf discs following cocultivation with Agrobacterium. Plant Mol. Biol. 14: 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson R.A., T.A. Kavanagh & M.W. Bevan, 1987. GUS fusion:-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 6: 3901–3907.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klimyuk V.I., B.J. Carrol, C.M. Thomas & J.D.G. Jones, 1993. Alkali treatment for rapid preparation of plant material for reliable PCR analysis. The Plant Journal 3: 493–494.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morikawa H., A. Iida & Y. Yamada, 1989. Transient expression of foreign genes in plant cells and tissues obtained by a simple biolistic device (particle gun). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31: 320–322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T. & F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffoni B., C. Damiano, F. Massabó & P. Esposito, 1990. Organogenesis and embryogenesis in Lisianthus russelianus Hook. Acta Horticulture 280: 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffoni, B., A. Giovannini, L. Semeria, F. Massabó, C. Costantino & A. Allavena, 1993. Tissue culture in lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum). In: T. Schiva & A. Mercuri (Eds). Creating Genetic Variation in Ornamentals. Proc. XVII Eucarpia Symp. Sanremo, Italy, 1–5 March 1993.

  • Russell J.A., D.H. Mihir & J.C. Sanford, 1992. Major improvement in biolistic transformation of suspension-cultured tobacco cells. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 28: 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiki R.K., D.H. Gelfand, S. Stoffel, S.J. Scharf, R. Higuchi, G.T. Hom, K.B. Mullis & H.A. Erlich, 1988. Primer directed amplifi cation of DNA with thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239: 487–491.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semeria, L. & A. Allavena, 1993. Genetic transformation of Eustoma grandiflorum Griseb. In: T. Schiva & A. Mercuri (Eds). Creating Genetic Variation in Ornamentals. Proc. XVII Eucarpia Symp. Sanremo, Italy, 1–5 March 1993.

  • Widholm J.M., 1972. The use of fluorescein diacetate and phenosafranine for determining viability of cultured plant cells. Stain Tech. 47: 189–194.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vain P., M.D. McMullen & J.J. Finer, 1993. Osmotic treatment enhances particle bombardment-mediated transient and stable transformation of maize. Plant Cell Rep. 12: 84–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Semeria, L., Vaira, A.M., Accotto, G.P. et al. Genetic transformation of Eustoma grandiflorum Griseb. by microprojectile bombardment. Euphytica 85, 125–130 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023940

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023940

Key words

Navigation