Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Arc sine % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr% 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq-Jc9% vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0-yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr-x% fr-xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWaaOaaaeaaca% WGqbaaleqaaaaa!36DD!\[\sqrt P \] transformation - an effective tool for graphical and numerical evaluation of planned Wöhler experiments

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Very important terms of fatigue testing, i.e. fatigue strength and minimum life, are often interpreted ambiguously. To avoid this, introduction of compulsory definitions of these terms with regard to statistical methods of planning tests and analyzing their results seems to be urgent. The arc since % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr% 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq-Jc9% vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0-yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr-x% fr-xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWaaOaaaeaaca% WGqbaaleqaaaaa!36DD!\[\sqrt P \] transformation, which until now has proved to be an outstanding evaluation method with special regard to engineering purposes, is reviewed. Both the numerical and the graphical way of evaluation is discussed and associated probability papers are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Dengel, Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik 20 (1989) 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.E. Little and E.H. Jebe, Statistical Design of Fatigue Experiments, Applied Science Publishers Ltd, London (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.B. Wheeler, Manual on Statistical Planning and Analysis for Fatigue Experiments, ASTM Special Technical Publication No. 588, Philadelphia (1975).

  4. R.A. Fisher, On the Dominance Ratio. Proceedings of the Royal Society (Edinburg) 42 (1921/22) 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ch. Eisenhart, in Ch. Eisenhart, M.W. Hasbay and W.A. Wallis (eds), Selected Techniques of Statistical Analysis for Scientific and Industrial Research and Production and Management Engineering, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York (1947) 395–416.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Hald, Statistical Theory with Engineering Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., London (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Stange, Angewandte Statistik, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N.R. Draper and H. Smith, Applied Regression Analysis, Second Edition, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.A. Fisher and F. Yates, Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research, Sixth Edition, Oliver and Boyd, London (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Perret, Konstruktion 3 (1951) 251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Dengel, Zeitschrift für Werkstofftechnik 6 (1975) 253–261.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Dorff, Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Berlin, Germany (1961).

  13. M. Maeisz, Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Berlin, Germany (1965).

  14. W.W. Maennig, Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Berlin, Germany (1966).

  15. W.W. Maennig, Materialprüfung 12 (1970) 124–131.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Dengel, Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Berlin, Germany (1967).

  17. F.W. Sackmann, Ph.D. thesis, University of Braunschweig, Germany (1980).

  18. F.W. Sackmann, Zeitschrift für Werkstofftechnik 12 (1981) 244–249.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Karim Khani and D. Dengel, Härterei-Technische Mitteilungen 47 (1992) 376–386.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Karim Khani, Materialwissenschaft und Werkstoffechnik 27 (1996) 190–198.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Panagopoulos and D. Dengel, Zeitschrift für Werkstofftechnik 15 (1984) 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Weber, Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Berlin, Germany (1989).

  23. E. Eckert, D. Dengel and H. Kunst, Härterei-Technische Mitteilungen 44 (1989) 296–302.

    Google Scholar 

  24. B.-J. Vorath, Zeitschrift für wirtschaftliche Fertigung 67 (1972) 412–418.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Probability Paper (Gaussian) with linear abscissa scale. DGQ 18-173, Order no. 32 784, Beuth Publication, Berlin, Germany.

  26. Probability Paper (Gaussian) with log abscissa scale. DGQ 18–173, Order no. 32 785, Beuth Publication, Berlin, Germany.

  27. Probability Paper (Weibull), Journal of Quality Technology 3 (1971) 2, 47.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Materials Technology, Technical University of Berlin, Strasse des 17.Juni, 10623, Berlin, Germany

    D. Dengel & M. Karim Khani

Authors
  1. D. Dengel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Karim Khani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dengel, D., Karim Khani, M. Arc sine % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr% 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq-Jc9% vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0-yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr-x% fr-xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWaaOaaaeaaca% WGqbaaleqaaaaa!36DD!\[\sqrt P \] transformation - an effective tool for graphical and numerical evaluation of planned Wöhler experiments. Int J Fract 80, 339–351 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018511

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018511

Keywords

Search

Navigation