Synopsis
Brown trout (Salmo trutta) were more efficient than Arizona trout (Salmo apache) in eating brine shrimp at starlight (10−4 fL) light levels. Arizona trout required light levels ≥ moonlight (10−3 fL) to feed. In bright light (50 fL), brown trout utilized cover to a much greater extent in both field and laboratory. Our study indicates that factors other than competition for food or habitat are probably causing the displacement of Arizona trout by brown trout when browns are stocked into the native habitat of Arizona trout.
Similar content being viewed by others
References cited
Ali, M. A. 1959. The ocular structure, retinomotor and photobehavioral responses of juvenile Pacific salmon. Can. J. Zool. 37: 965–996.
Andrusak, H. & T. G. Northcote. 1971. Segregation between adult cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki) and Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) in small British Columbia lakes. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 28: 1259–1268.
Behnke, R. J. & M. Zarn. 1976. Biology and management of threatened and endangered western trouts. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-28. 45 pp.
Bishop, J. E. 1969. Light control of aquatic insect activity and drift. Ecology 50: 371–380.
Brett, J. R. & C. Groot. 1962. Some aspects of olfactory and visual responses in Pacific salmon. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 20: 287–303.
Brynildson, O. M., V. A. Hacker & T. A. Klick. 1963. Brown trout — its life history, ecology, and management. Publ. 234, Wisc. Cons. Dept. 14 pp.
Butler, R. L. & U. M. Hawthorne. 1968. The reactions of dominant trout to changes in overhead artificial cover. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 97: 37–41.
Elliott, J. M. 1967. The food of trout (Salmo trutta) in a Dartmoor stream. J. Appl. Ecol. 4: 59–71.
Gibson, J. R. & M. H. A. Keenleyside. 1966. Responses to light of young Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). J. Fish. Res. Board Can 23 1007–1024.
Harper, K. C. 1976. On the biology ofSalmo apache and its. management implications, M. S. thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson. 43 pp.
Hoar, W. S. 1942. Diurnal variations in feeding activity of young salmon and trout. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 6: 90–101.
Holanov, S. H. & J. C. Tash. 1978. Particulate and filter feeding in the threadfin shad,Dorosoma petenense (Gunther), at different light intensities. J. Fish. Biol. 13: 619–625.
Holt, C. S. & T. F. Waters. 1967. Effects of light intensity on the drift of stream invertebrates. Ecology 48: 225–234.
Hunter, J. R. 1968. Effects of light on schooling and feeding of jack mackerel,Trachurus symmetricus. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 25: 393–407.
Hynes, H. B. N. 1970. The ecology of running waters. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. 555 pp.
Jenkins, T. M. Jr. 1969. Observations on color changes of brown and rainbow trout (Salmo trutta andSalmo gairdneri) in stream habitats, with description of an unusual color pattern in brown trout. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 98: 517–519.
Jenkins, T. M. Jr., C. R. Feldmeth & G. V. Elliot. 1970. Feeding of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) in relation to abundance of drifting invertebrates in a mountain stream. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 27: 2356–2361.
Jenkins, T. M. Jr. & A. Klain. 1969. Social structure, position choice, and microdistribution of two trout species (Salmo trutta andSalmo gairdneri) resident in mountain streams. An. Beh. Mono. 2: 57–123.
Kalleberg, H. 1958. Observations in a stream tank of territoriality and competition in juvenile salmon and trout (Salmo salar L. andSalmo trutta L.). Rept. Instit. Freshw. Res. Drottingholm 39: 55–98.
Lewis, S. L. 1969. Physical factors influencing fish populations in pools of a trout stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 98: 14–19.
McCrimmon, H. R. & W.-H. Kwain. 1966. Use of overhead cover by rainbow trout exposed to a series of light intensities. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 23: 983–990.
Miller, R. R. 1972. Classfication of the native trouts of Arizona with the description of a new species,Salmo apache. Copeia 1972: 401–422.
Needham, P. R. 1969. Trout streams. Holden Day, Inc., San Francisco. 241 pp.
Newman, M. A. 1956. Social behavior and interspecific competition in two trout species. Physiol. Zool. 29: 64–81.
Nillson, N. A. 1963. Interaction between trout and char in Scandinavia. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 92: 276–285.
Nillson, N. A. 1965. Food segregation between salmonid species in North Sweden. Rept. Instit. Freshw. Res. Drottingholm 46: 58–78.
Ritter, J. A. & H. R. MacCrimmon. 1973. Effects of illumination on behavior of wild brown and rainbow trout exposed to black and white backgrounds. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 30: 1875–1880.
Robinson, F. W. 1978. Feeding by brown trout (Salmo trutta) and Arizona trout (Salmo apache) at various light levels. M.S. thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson. 30 pp.
Schutz, D. C. & T. G. Northcote. 1972. An experimental study of feeding behavior and interaction of coastal cutthroat trout and Dolly Varden. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 29: 555–565.
Ware, D. M. 1972. Predation by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri): the influence of hunger, prey density, and prey size. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 29: 1193–1201.
Waters, T. F. 1969. Invertebrate drift-ecology and significance to stream fishes. pp. 121–123. In: T. G. Northcote (ed.) Symp. Salmon Trout Streams, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Werner, E. E. & D. J. Hall. 1976. Niche shifts in sunfishes: experimental evidence and significance. Science 191: 404–406.
Werner, E. E. & D. J. Hall. 1977. Competition and habitat shift in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology 58: 869–876.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robinson, F.W., Tash, J.C. Feeding by Arizona trout (Salmo apache) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) at different light intensities. Environ Biol Fish 4, 363–368 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005525
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005525