Abstract
The urban villages are a common yet heterogeneous informal living space in China's developed cities, characterised by high density, a high degree of autonomy, and difficulty in being regulated by the government. As a provider of low-cost residential accommodation, they have contributed significantly to the successful growth of cities, however, they have also posed a number of problems such as hygiene and security. During the period of rapid industrialisation and urbanisation in China, the government has often considered demolition and redevelopment to be a convenient and cost-effective way of regenerating the urban villages. However, with the recent shortage in the supply of land resources and soaring land prices, the demolition and redevelopment approach has created a series of social and policy issues. Recently, comprehensive improvement—a way of beautifying the built environment and optimising management without altering the building construction—has been introduced as an alternative approach to regenerate urban villages and it is anticipated as a sustainable model of urban regeneration. The planning and implementation process involves multiple stakeholders, including the government, developers, villagers, tenants, etc. These different actors, however, all have different interests and expectations in the processes of planning, implementation, and operation. While contributing to the sustainability of the regeneration projects, many potential problems have also arisen, some of which have led to small-scale open protests. This chapter uses the case of Jingle Village in Shenzhen as a case study to examine the interests of different stakeholders at different stages of the comprehensive improvement process and the problems faced in the implementation of the project. The chapter critically assesses and analyses the positions and roles of the various stakeholders at different levels based on in-depth semi-structured interviews and resident questionnaires, in order to assesses the sustainability of the new regeneration model. The findings can contribute significantly to the sustainability of urban regeneration strategies in China and even the global South. The analysis of the different levels of stakeholders also will be of great value in informing many different types of regeneration policies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bromley, R. D. F., Tallon, A. R., & Thomas, C. J. (2016). City centre regeneration through residential development: Contributing to sustainability. Urban Studies, 42(13), 2407–2429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500379537
Chiu-Shee, C., & Zheng, S. (2019). A burden or a tool? Rationalizing public housing provision in Chinese cities. Housing Studies, 36(4), 500–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1667490
Cybriwsky, R. (2013). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City, Neil Smith. Urban Geography, 20(1), 93–94. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.20.1.93
Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. New Perspectives Quarterly, 23(2), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-5842.2006.00797.X
Doshi, S. (2013). The politics of the evicted: Redevelopment, subjectivity, and difference in Mumbai’s slum frontier. Antipode, 45(4), 844–865. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8330.2012.01023.X
Dovey, K., van Oostrum, M., Chatterjee, I., & Shafique, T. (2020). Towards a morphogenesis of informal settlements. Habitat International, 104, 102240. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HABITATINT.2020.102240
Dowall, D. E. (1991). Comparing Karachi’s informal and formal housing delivery systems. Cities, 8(3), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-2751(91)90061-U
Dupont, V., Jordhus-Lier, D., Sutherland, C., & Braathen, E. (2015). The politics of slums in the global south: Urban informality in Brazil, India. Routledge.
Fekade, W. (2000). Deficits of formal urban land management and informal responses under rapid urban growth, an international perspective. Habitat International, 24(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(99)00034-X
Gao, Y., Shahab, S., & Ahmadpoor, N. (2020). Morphology of urban villages in China: A case study of Dayuan Village in Guangzhou. Urban Science, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci4020023
Hin, L. L., & Xin, L. (2011). Redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen, China—An analysis of power relations and urban coalitions. Habitat International, 35(3), 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HABITATINT.2010.12.001
Huchzermeyer, M. (2011). Cities with ‘slums’: From informal settlement eradication to a right to the city in Africa. Juta and Company Ltd.
Jiang, Y., Mohabir, N., Ma, R., Wu, L., & Chen, M. (2020). Whose village? Stakeholder interests in the urban renewal of Hubei old village in Shenzhen. Land Use Policy, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104411
Kriese, U., & Scholz, R. W. (2011). The positioning of sustainability within residential property marketing. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1503–1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010375321
Li, B., Tong, D., Wu, Y., & Li, G. (2021). Government-backed ‘laundering of the grey’ in upgrading urban village properties: Ningmeng Apartment Project in Shuiwei Village, Shenzhen, China. Progress in Planning, 146, 100436. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROGRESS.2019.100436
Liu, Y., Geertman, S., van Oort, F., & Lin, Y. (2018). Making the ‘invisible’ visible: Redevelopment-induced displacement of migrants in Shenzhen, China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(3), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12646
Liu, Y., Wu, F., Liu, Y., & Li, Z. (2016). Changing neighbourhood cohesion under the impact of urban redevelopment: A case study of Guangzhou, China. Urban Geography, 38(2), 266–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1152842
Luohu District People’s Government Office of Shenzhen. (2018). Notice of Luohu District People’s Government Office of Shenzhen Municipality on printing and distributing the Action Plan for comprehensive Management of “Villages in Cities” in Luohu District (2018–2020).
Pan, W., & Du, J. (2021). Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China. Land Use Policy, 111, 105744. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2021.105744
Ren, X. (2017). Governing the informal: Housing policies over informal settlements in China, India, and Brazil. Housing Policy Debate, 28(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2016.1247105
Shenzhen Municipal Bureau of Planning and Natural Resources. (2018). What is the urban renewal of comprehensive improvement? http://www.sz.gov.cn/ghj/ywgz_3_3/qtl/201811/t20181115_14516897.htm
Shenzhen Municipal Bureau of Planning and Natural Resources. (2019). Overall planning for comprehensive improvement of urban villages (old villages) in Shenzhen.
Tan, Y., He, J., Han, H., & Zhang, W. (2019). Evaluating residents’ satisfaction with market-oriented urban village transformation: A case study of Yangji Village in Guangzhou, China. Cities, 95(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102394
Uehara, Y. (2008). Unknown urbanity: Towards the village in the city. Architectural Design, 78(5), 52–55.
Wang, Y. Y. P., Wang, Y. Y. P., & Wu, J. (2009). Urbanization and informal development in China: Urban villages in Shenzhen. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(4), 957–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-2427.2009.00891.X
Wang, Y. P., Wang, Y., & Wu, J. (2010). Housing migrant workers in rapidly urbanizing regions: A study of the Chinese model in Shenzhen. Housing Studies, 25(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030903362019
Wang, H., Zhao, Y., Gao, X., & Gao, B. (2021). Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Land Use Policy, 107, 105479.
Wu, F. (2016). Housing in Chinese urban villages: The dwellers, conditions and tenancy informality. Housing Studies, 31(7), 852–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2016.1150429
Wu, F., Zhang, F., & Webster, C. (2012). Informality and the development and demolition of urban villages in the Chinese peri-urban area. Urban Studies, 50(10), 1919–1934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012466600
Xinhua News Agency. (2006). Footprint of the Republic—2006: Building a harmonious society. http://www.gov.cn/test/2009-10/20/content_1444026.htm
Yangteng, Y. (2004). Rebuilding villages in the city, cutting “tumors” in Shenzhen. The Economic Journal.
Zhang, L., Zhao, S. X. B., & Tian, J. P. (2003). Self-help in housing and chengzhongcun in China’s urbanization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 912–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0309-1317.2003.00491.X
Zheng, H. W., Shen, G. Q., & Wang, H. (2014). A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal. Habitat International, 41, 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.08.006
Zhou, B. (2004). Sigh of shenzhen police (pp. 6–12).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen, P., Heath, T. (2024). The New Strategy of Urban Village Regeneration: The Comprehensive Improvement Project in Jingle Village, Shenzhen, China. In: Mangi, E., Chen, W., Heath, T., Cheshmehzangi, A. (eds) Innovative Public Participation Practices for Sustainable Urban Regeneration. Urban Sustainability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9595-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9595-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-9594-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-9595-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)