Abstract
In this chapter, we analyse the life-cycle of international partnerships between an Australian university and universities and schools in Nepal and Bhutan. The collaboration placed the Australian university hosts in a distinctive role with special responsibilities of providing stimuli, engaging teachers and teacher educators in joint processes of working through contradictions, developing new ideas for practice, and supporting their embedding in institutional practices. Participants included researchers, teacher educators, in-service teachers, pre-service teachers, and school students. The partnerships produced lasting positive changes that broke away from existing practices in ways that were often deemed unviable. Using Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT), we explore partnerships as a process of jointly creating new knowledge and artefacts that make new practices possible. Conflicts of motives were crucial—not between different partners, but between motives to enact engaging, inclusive pedagogies, and seemingly opposed motives to cover curriculum content. Participants were able to resolve this dilemma, develop models for new practices, and then implement these. The chapter highlights the expansive nature of the learning that can take place through school-university partnerships, offering wider lessons for those seeking to create school-university partnerships to transgress the status quo and realise what was previously considered impossible.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bernay, R., Stringer, P., Milne, J., & Jhagroo, J. (2020). Three models of effective school–university partnerships. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 55, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-020-00171-3
Botha, L. R. (2017). Changing educational traditions with the change laboratory. Education as Change, 21(1), 73–94.
Bradbury, O. J., & Acquaro, D. (2022). An introduction to school-university partnerships: Innovation in initial teacher education. In O. J. Bradbury & D. Acquaro (Eds.), School-university partnerships: Innovation in initial teacher education (pp. 1–6). Springer Nature.
Brady, L. (2002). School university partnerships: What do the schools want? The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 1–8.
Carney, S., & Rappleye, J. (2011). Education reform in Nepal: From modernity to conflict. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2010.513274
Childs, A., Tenzin, W., Johnson, D., & Ramachandran, K. (2012). Science education in Bhutan: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.626461
Dados, N., & Connell, R. (2012). The global south. Contexts, 11(1), 12–13.
Dhendup, S., & Sherab, K. (2023). Exploring Bhutanese primary school teachers’ technological knowledge. Journal of Global Education and Research, 7(2), 116–130.
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Edwards, A., & Mackenzie, L. (2005). Steps towards participation: The social support of learning trajectories. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 24(4), 282–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370500169178
Engeström, Y. (2016). Studies in expansive learning: Learning what is not yet there. Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., Rantavuori, P., Ruutu, P., & Tapola-Haapala, M. (2023). From future orientation to future-making: Toward adolescents’ transformative agency. In N. Hopwood, & A. Sannino (Eds.), Agency and transformation: Motives, mediation and motion. Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2007). Putting Vygotsky to work: The Change Laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363–382). Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2022). Learning in activity. In K. R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 134–155). Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111132758
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2021). From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: Four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
Engeström, Y., Sannino, A., & Virkkunen, J. (2014). On the methodological demands of formative interventions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2014.891868
Fagg, H. (2006). Back to the sources: A study of Gandhi’s basic education. National Book Trust.
Faikhamta, C., Ketsing, J., Tanak, A., & Chamrat, S. (2018). Science teacher education in Thailand: A challenging journey. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-018-0021-8
Farrell, R. (2023). The School-University nexus and degrees of partnership in initial teacher education. Irish Educational Studies, 42(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1899031
Green, C. A., Tindall-Ford, S. K., & Eady, M. J. (2020). School-university partnerships in Australia: A systematic literature review. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(4), 403–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1651822
Grundy, S., Robison, J., & Tomazos, D. (2001). Interrupting the way things are: Exploring new directions in school/university partnerships. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660120091829
Hamal, S. (2020). Decentralization of education in Nepal: A rein in a horse nose. Social Inquiry: Journal of Social Science Research, 2(2), 194–215. https://doi.org/10.3126/sijssr.v2i2.33060
Handscomb, G., Gu, Q., & Varley, M. (2014). School-university partnerships: Fulfilling the potential literature review. University of Bristol and University of the West of England.
Jakhelln, R., & Postholm, M. B. (2022). University–school collaboration as an arena for community-building in teacher education. Educational Research, 64(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2022.2071750
Jones, M., Hobbs, L., Kenny, J., Campbell, C., Chittleborough, G., Gilbert, A., Herbert, S., & Redman, C. (2016). Successful University-School partnerships: An interpretive framework to inform partnership practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.006
Kunwar, R. (2020). Math mania: Meaning, problems and ways of effective teaching and learning mathematics at basic level education in Nepal. International Journal of Science and Research, 9(8), 1136–1141.
Liberali, F. (2019). Transforming urban education in São Paulo: Insights into a critical-collaborative school project. DELTA: Documentação De Estudos Em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 35(3), 1–26.
Luitel, B. C. (2013). Mathematics as an im/pure knowledge system: Symbiosis, (w)holism and synergy in mathematics education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9366-8
McDonald, L., & Tufue-Dolgoy, R. (2013). Moving forwards, sideways or backwards? Inclusive education in Samoa. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 60(3), 270–284.
Ministry of Education. (2014). Bhutan Education Blueprint 2014–2024: Rethinking education. Ministry of Education, Royal Government of Bhutan.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2076 [2019]). राष्ट्रिय शिक्षा नीति, २०७६/National Education Policy: 2076 [2019]. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
Neupane, P. (2020). Policy framework for education development in Nepal. International Education Studies, 13(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n1p89
Nganga, L., Thapa, S., Kambutu, J., & Akpovo, S. M. (2020). Inclusive special needs and disability education: History, policies, practice and challenges in Kenya and Nepal. In P. Wood (Ed.), Policy, provision and practice for special educational needs and disability: Perspectives across countries (pp. 42–55). Routledge.
Perry, C., Komesaroff, L., & Kavanagh, M. (2002). Providing space for teacher renewal: The role of the facilitator in school-university partnerships. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866022000048402
Phuntsho, K. (2000). On the two ways of learning in Bhutan. Journal of Bhutan Studies, 2(2), 96–126.
Rinchen, S. (2014). A study of the emotional climate of a science education class for pre-service teachers in Bhutan [PhD, Queensland University of Technology].
Royal Education Council. (2021). New normal science curriculum framework: Classes PP-XII. Royal Education Council.
Russo, J., Bragg, L. A., & Russo, T. (2021). How primary teachers use games to support their teaching of mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 14(4), 407–419.
Sannino, A. (2015). The principle of double stimulation: A path to volitional action. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.01.001
Shrestha, K. N. (2017). English in Nepal: From a guest language to the best language. NELTA ELT Forum. Retrieved 16 December from https://neltaeltforum.wordpress.com/2017/08/05/english-in-nepal-from-a-guest-language-to-the-best-language/
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. The Autodesk Foundation.
Tobden, J., & Ham, M. (2022). Gross National Happiness and challenges for education in Bhutan: Perspectives of policy experts. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 21(2), 116–128.
Virkkunen, J., & Newnham, S. (2013). The change laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education. Sense.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hopwood, N. et al. (2024). School-University Partnerships on the Edge of Possibility: Expansive Learning and Practice Transformation Across Australia, Nepal, and Bhutan. In: Green, C.A., Eady, M.J. (eds) Creating, Sustaining, and Enhancing Purposeful School-University Partnerships. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8838-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8838-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8837-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8838-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)