Skip to main content

Machine Learning Hybrid Approach for the Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease Using Electroencephalogram: A Comparative Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Intelligence for Research and Innovations (MAiTRI 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 831))

  • 70 Accesses

Abstract

It has been challenging to develop efficient Machine Learning models due to the lack of electroencephalography (EEG) data. In this paper, a unique hybrid data augmentation pipeline strategy is proposed to improve the performance of a model that categorizes cognition in Parkinson’s disease (PD) using EEG signals. In this study, a hybrid method is implemented, which includes time-shifting, noise addition, subsampling, filtering and synthetic data synthesis using a GAN model. This technique is designed to augment the EEG data with realistic-looking synthetic EEG data. The experiment is carried out on an EEG dataset obtained from the North Shore Health Institute in Chicago. In this experiment, the hybrid data augmentation pipeline strategy is used to generate augmented data from the raw EEG data. After performing preprocessing using Independent Component Analysis (ICA), feature extraction is done using Debiased Weighted Phase Lag Index (dwPLI) and other connectivity measures. The classification is performed with a Random Forest classifier to classify four categories of cognition (healthy control (HC), PD-normal control (PD-NC), PD-mild cognitive impaired (PD-MCI) and PD-demented (PDD). The results show that the proposed approach is capable of generating authentic EEG data which improves the accuracy of the classification model. Furthermore, the mean accuracy of classification after data augmentation is increased by 7% for both training and testing accuracies. Additionally, sensitivity has increased significantly from 55 to 70%. Therefore, a hybrid data augmentation technique is helpful in overcoming data shortage concerns for EEG-based cognitive status categorization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parkinson J (2002) An essay on the shaking palsy. 1817. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1176/JNP.14.2.223

  2. Lees A (2017) An essay on the shaking palsy. Brain 140(3):843–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Geraedts VJ et al (2018) Clinical correlates of quantitative EEG in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Neurology 91(19):871–883. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caviness JN et al (2007) Both early and late cognitive dysfunction affects the electroencephalogram in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 13(6):348–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PARKRELDIS.2007.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abós A et al (2017) Discriminating cognitive status in Parkinson’s disease through functional connectomics and machine learning. Sci Rep 7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Geraedts VJ et al (2018) Quantitative EEG reflects non-dopaminergic disease severity in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol 129(8):1748–1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.04.752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Utianski RL et al (2016) Graph theory network function in Parkinson’s disease assessed with electroencephalography. Clin Neurophysiol 127(5):2228–2236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.02.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Betrouni N et al (2019) Electroencephalography-based machine learning for cognitive profiling in Parkinson’s disease: preliminary results. Mov Disord 34(2):210–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/MDS.27528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geraedts VJ et al (2021) Machine learning for automated EEG-based biomarkers of cognitive impairment during Deep Brain Stimulation screening in patients with Parkinson’s Disease. Clin Neurophysiol 132(5):1041–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaturvedi M et al (2019) Phase lag index and spectral power as QEEG features for identification of patients with mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol 130(10):1937–1944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Novak K, Chase BA, Narayanan J, Indic P, Markopoulou K (2022) Quantitative electroencephalography as a biomarker for cognitive dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.804991

  12. Postalcioglu S (2021) Wavelet transform based feature extraction for EEG signal classification. Wseas Trans Comput 20:199–206. https://doi.org/10.37394/23205.2021.20.21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar N, Alam K, Siddiqi AH (2017) Wavelet transform for classification of EEG signal using SVM and ANN. Biomed Pharmacol J 10(4):2061–2069. https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dyk DAV, Meng XL (2012) The art of data augmentation. 10(1):1–50. https://doi.org/10.1198/10618600152418584

  15. Lei C, Hu B, Wang D, Zhang S, Chen Z (2019) A preliminary study on data augmentation of deep learning for image classification. In: ACM international conference proceeding series, June 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3361242.3361259

  16. Zhang A, Su L, Zhang Y, Fu Y, Wu L, Liang S (2022) EEG data augmentation for emotion recognition with a multiple generator conditional Wasserstein GAN. Complex Intell Syst 8(4):3059–3071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00336-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gschwandtner U, Bogaarts G, Roth V, Fuhr P (2023) Prediction of cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with electroencephalography (EEG) connectivity characterized by time-between-phase-crossing (TBPC). Sci Rep 13(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32345-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kalashami MP, Pedram MM, Sadr H (2022) EEG feature extraction and data augmentation in emotion recognition. Comput Intell Neurosci 2022

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rommel C, Paillard J, Moreau T, Gramfort A (2022) Data augmentation for learning predictive models on EEG: a systematic comparison. J Neural Eng 19(6)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kalashami MP, Pedram MM, Sadr H (2022) EEG feature extraction and data augmentation in emotion recognition. Comput Intell Neurosci 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7028517

  21. Lashgari E, Liang D, Maoz U (2020) Data augmentation for deep-learning-based electroencephalography. J Neurosci Methods 346:108885. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNEUMETH.2020.108885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hospital Health System in the Chicago Area. NorthShore. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 29]. Available from https://www.northshore.org/

  23. Dautzenberg G, Lijmer J, Beekman A (2021) Clinical value of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in patients suspected of cognitive impairment in old age psychiatry. Using the MoCA for triaging to a memory clinic. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 26(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2020.1850434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. MoCA test for dementia: results, diagnosis, and more. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/moca-test-for-dementia#uses. Accessed 24 Mar 2023

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sukesha Sharma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sharma, A., Gupta, A., Sharma, S. (2024). Machine Learning Hybrid Approach for the Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease Using Electroencephalogram: A Comparative Analysis. In: Verma, O.P., Wang, L., Kumar, R., Yadav, A. (eds) Machine Intelligence for Research and Innovations. MAiTRI 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 831. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8135-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics