Skip to main content

Review on Algorithm for Fusion of Oblique Data and Radar Point Cloud

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Communications, Signal Processing, and Systems (CSPS 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 1033))

  • 93 Accesses

Abstract

With the development of “Digital Earth,” “Reality-Based 3D China,” and “Smart Cities,” technologies such as UAV aerial photography, photogrammetry, LiDAR, oblique photogrammetry, and SLAM are increasingly utilized for constructing reality-based 3D models. However, each individual technology has its limitations in 3D reconstruction, especially in the fine modeling of buildings, such as occlusion in texture mapping and low model accuracy. While oblique photogrammetry captures multi-angle images of terrains, it encounters challenges when acquiring images in concealed locations, resulting in structural deformations and surface artifacts, leading to insufficient model precision and poor elevation accuracy. LiDAR point clouds complement the geometric structure in the blind areas of oblique photogrammetry, resulting in smoother ground surfaces and sharper edges and lines at the base of buildings. Integrating vehicle-mounted LiDAR point clouds with oblique photogrammetry effectively compensates for the limitations of using a single data source for 3D model creation and improves model accuracy. In 3D reconstruction, the fusion of oblique photogrammetry and LiDAR data is crucial. The classical Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm, widely used in point cloud registration, iteratively finds the closest point pairs between two point sets to calculate the transformation matrix, converging to a certain threshold. However, ICP requires a high initial position accuracy of point clouds, and its simple selection of corresponding points based on Euclidean distance may lead to mismatches, impacting the registration precision. As a result, numerous scholars have made improvements and research on this algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zheng X, Chen D, Wang Q et al (2014) Seawater desalination in China: retrospect and prospect. Chem Eng J 242:404–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang B, Ali F, Zhou B et al (2022) A novel approach of efficient 3D reconstruction for real scene using unmanned aerial vehicle oblique photogrammetry with five cameras. Comput Electr Eng 99:107804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang R, Li H, Duan K et al (2020) Automatic detection of earthquake-damaged buildings by integrating UAV oblique photography and infrared thermal imaging. Rem. Sens. 12(16):2621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang X, Wang Y, Ma L et al (2020) Information processing technology in the digital protection of architectural cultural heritage. In: 2020 international conference on culture-oriented science and technology (ICCST). IEEE, pp 496–499

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yang L, Li E, Long T et al (2018) A welding quality detection method for arc welding robot based on 3D reconstruction with SFS algorithm. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 94:1209–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kohek S, Strnad D (2018) Interactive large-scale procedural forest construction and visualization based on particle flow simulation. Comput Graph Forum 37(1):389–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrie G (2009) Systematic oblique aerial photography using multiple digital cameras. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 75(2):102–107

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ge L, Chang HC, Rizos C (2007) Mine subsidence monitoring using multi-source satellite SAR images. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 73(3):259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu H, Wang Y, Xing L et al (2021) Application analysis of three-dimensional real scene modeling of substation site based on UAV tilt photography. In: 2021 2nd international conference on intelligent design (ICID). IEEE, pp 220–225

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim BO, Yun KH, Lee CK (2014) The use of elevation adjusted ground control points for aerial triangulation in coastal areas. KSCE J Civ Eng 18:1825–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang J (2010) Multi-source remote sensing data fusion: status and trends. Int J Image Data Fusion 1(1):5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang R, Zhang Q, Fu CW et al (2019) Underexposed photo enhancement using deep illumination estimation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 6849–6857

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wunsch P, Hirzinger G (1996) Registration of CAD-models to images by iterative inverse perspective matching. In: Proceedings of 13th international conference on pattern recognition. IEEE, vol 1, pp 78–83

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ulvi A (2021) Documentation, three-dimensional (3D) modelling and visualization of cultural heritage by using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanners. Int J Remote Sens 42(6):1994–2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu J, You S, Neumann U (2003) Approaches to large-scale urban modeling. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 23(6):62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eker R, Aydın A, Hübl J (2018) Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based monitoring of a landslide: Gallenzerkogel landslide (Ybbs-Lower Austria) case study. Environ Monit Assess 190:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oveland I, Hauglin M, Giannetti F et al (2018) Comparing three different ground based laser scanning methods for tree stem detection. Remote Sens 10(4):538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Feng Q, Liu J, Gong J (2015) Urban flood mapping based on unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing and random forest classifier—a case of Yuyao, China. Water 7(4):1437–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Díaz-Varela RA, De la Rosa R, León L et al (2015) High-resolution airborne UAV imagery to assess olive tree crown parameters using 3D photo reconstruction: application in breeding trials. Rem. Sensing 7(4):4213–4232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen Y (2016) Industrial information integration—a literature review 2006–2015. J Ind Inf Integr 2:30–64

    Google Scholar 

  21. Deng T, Zhang K, Shen ZJM (2021) A systematic review of a digital twin city: a new pattern of urban governance toward smart cities. J Manag Sci Eng 6(2):125–134

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ma J, Jiang J (2011) Applications of fault detection and diagnosis methods in nuclear power plants: a review. Prog Nucl Energy 53(3):255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gu X, Wang X, Guo Y (2020) A review of research on point cloud registration methods. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 782(2):022070

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lomonte B, Sasa M, Rey-Suárez P et al (2016) Venom of the coral snake Micrurus clarki: proteomic profile, toxicity, immunological cross-neutralization, and characterization of a three-finger toxin. Toxins 8(5):138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang J, Li H, Campbell D et al (2015) Go-ICP: a globally optimal solution to 3D ICP point-set registration. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 38(11):2241–2254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou QY, Park J, Koltun V (2016) Fast global registration. In: Computer vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 11–14 Oct 2016, Proceedings, Part II 14. Springer International Publishing, pp 766–782

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dong Z, Liang F, Yang B et al (2020) Registration of large-scale terrestrial laser scanner point clouds: a review and benchmark. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 163:327–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fu K, Liu S, Luo X et al (2021) Robust point cloud registration framework based on deep graph matching. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 8893–8902

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang C, Patras P, Haddadi H (2019) Deep learning in mobile and wireless networking: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 21(3):2224–2287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Casanova H, Giersch A, Legrand A et al (2014) Versatile, scalable, and accurate simulation of distributed applications and platforms. J Parall Distrib Comput 74(10):2899–2917

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guowei Che .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sun, C., Che, G., Dong, X., Zou, R., Feng, L., Ding, X. (2024). Review on Algorithm for Fusion of Oblique Data and Radar Point Cloud. In: Wang, W., Liu, X., Na, Z., Zhang, B. (eds) Communications, Signal Processing, and Systems. CSPS 2023. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 1033. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7502-0_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7502-0_58

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-7555-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-7502-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics